"One of the best true crime writers today." ~ Ann Rule, about Kathryn Casey.
I finally finished reading the book!! It took me much longer to finish reading this book than I normally take (will explain why).
First of all, I am a huge fan of Ann Rule (although I disagree with her on a few points). And, that was the reason I read this book. She mentioned Casey as a great true crime writer and that was enough for me. So, it's the first book for me by Kathryn Casey!
It is a true crime book which tells the story of Eric Williams who, with the help of his wife Kim, murdered two prosecutors and the wife of one of them. Eric was a lawyer, a judge of the peace who was a respected figure in the community and he also earned good money. Everything he worked hard for years was taken away from him after those two prosecutors insisted on prosecuting him for stealing $600 computer monitors (there was some political history involved). It was said that he was pushed too hard and that he "snapped". It was a hate crime.
Some early odd behavior of Eric was highlighted in the book, but nothing that's too alarming. I'm not going to focus on the story since it was well covered in the media (if you're American). And, there's nothing much to say.
Let's move to the book and the author:
1- I have to praise Kathryn for her excellent and meticulous research. Also, she was the only person who Eric and Kim agreed to meet with behind bars. She visited them many times.
2- Kathryn is a matter-of-factly person. It's rare to read an opinion of her throughout the book (maybe the last few pages in just a few lines). So, if you are among those who prefer dry facts in true crime, then you will like her writing style. It can feel dry and without a soul at times though. Some readers criticized Ann Rule for dropping in her opinions frequently, which is something I disagree with although Casey is more about just facts for sure.
3- My main problem with this book is the lack of suspense. This is why it took me so long. By the way, I have not heard of the crime before so it should have been suspenseful. I knew exactly what was going to happen next throughout the book and even the ending right from the first few chapters. It is not a page-turner and did not keep me up late to read which was too bad because Casey's research was excellent.
Something to note here -- Writing a true crime book can be tricky compared to fiction crime in my opinion. In true crime, it's not the author's story. The author has facts, dates, information, etc...so to make it suspenseful you have to add your touch or 'magic touch'. Casey seems like a person who wants to tell it as it is - which many readers love. In fiction crime, its the author's story so they can play with the plot the way they want to make it suspenseful. I prefer Rule's writings since she gives a soul to her book without fabricating any detail :) It depends on your taste really.
4- The word psychopath is overly used in crime books. Again, the author did not add her opinion, but that was the description of some characters in the book of Eric. In my opinion, he is not a psychopath yet an egotistical SOB who held grudges and hate towards whoever tried to scratch his fragile ego. He lived in his own world by his own rules. He was too absorbed with movies and games, thinking of weapons as his toys and people as things. He could do whatever he wanted. Of course there was a mention that he killed cats as a young boy, something most writers focus on to lead you to think of psychopathy early on.
As for Kim, she was a typical weak, weak woman who fed off Eric. I never accept excuses like "I wasn't in my right mind", "I was afraid of him", "I was living on liquid morphine so I just did what he wanted me to do", etc..How about taking away the lives of innocent people? Haven't you thought about it? Let's be honest, of course she was mad too because the prosecutors took away the dinero $$. What angered him angered her. And being weak helped. Good she testified though. And, she looks much better in prison than when she lived with him. She's weak.
5- There wasn't any psychology tests/psychoanalysis of Eric mentioned in the book (don't know if there was any done to him) which was too unfortunate for me. To all fans of true crime who look for the psychology/human behavior part in true crime books, there isn't much there.
6- One thing Rule's fans criticized her for was her continuous praise of the looks of the victims in all her stories. They were all so pretty. Casey, again, describes them as they are which is far better for sure.
All in all, I thank Kathryn for her incredible research (4 stars for that even though it wasn't a very enjoyable read). I will definitely be reading more books by her!!
I hope my review was useful :)
Happy reading!!