Some of the essays in this book are very good, convicting, and thought provoking. Worth reading it.
The one that I found most interesting is entitled, "Housework and High-Flown Ideas." If you want to "know" the wonderful and loving Elisabeth Elliot "mad", read this one. In this essay she challenges, with poignant sarcasm, the new ideas (this book was published in 1976) of feminism and equality of roles between men and women that were finding their way into the church. Here are a few excerpts:
Thus she starts her essay, "I had made up my mind several weeks ago that I would probably have to write something sometime about women's liberation. I wouldn't be able to endure it in silence much longer."
"Recently I learned that one of the more sensible and clear-eyed Presbyterian ministers of my acquaintances is "swinging over to the 'woman-elder' side because of the weirdos pushing against ordination." Reasoning like that makes me want to shriek, rend my garments and throw dust in the air. I would be sorry in any case to learn that this particular minister favors the ordination of women -he was one of the few left that I was counting on to swim against the tide- but if he favors it in order not to have to keep company with weirdos he's probably jumping out of the frying pan into the fire. Which side has more weirdos?"
"I must confess I had no idea how weird I was myself until I read a book which has been enthusiastically welcomed among Christians...They answer some questions I have been too obtuse to ask, such as why God did not choose to send a female Messiah...how the word "head" carries no connotation of authority, and why we ought not to limit our references to God almighty as he -for does not God refer to himself (there I go -my sexism is showing- why I didn't I write "herself"?)as like a woman in travail, a mother, a hen, a woman sweeping her house? The authors suggest, in fact, that the pronoun "Thou" ought perhaps to be substituted for he/she..."
"Another question was where in the world everybody has got the notion that sexes have different functions? Nonsense, we are told. There's no such thing as separate spheres or different functions. All the myths, all the poetry, all the history of the world have led us down the garden path and it certainly isn't the Garden of Eden. Let's go back to reality and common sense, and stop thinking of men as different from women they say."
"I found out, for example, that as a traditionalist I am also sexist, whatever that means. Nobody has told me exactly, but it is a very bad word which seems to imply that I insist on recognizing and perpetuating "la difference."
"I, this book tells me, have been forced into playing a role-conforming to a stereotype...I was supposed to to be "cramped," "restrained," and to feel like a "crushed automaton" with no identity. Alas! I did poorly at feeling that way."
"Miss Hardesty and Mrs. Scanzoni inform me that nobody's in charge of my marriage except God. There is no other "head," the apostle Paul notwithstanding. It's a partnership, both parties exactly equal, accountable only to God, and that as a relationship or "companionship" or "covenant" neither can possibly have any authority over the other. (I thought that in my "relationship" or "companionship" or "covenant" with God he had authority. Are this ideas mutually exclusive?) Marriage was never a fifty-fifty proposition for me. I didn't want it to be because I understood that woman was made for man, but now it is claimed that nobody was made for anybody but God."
"The "traditional" view of marriage, it is alleged, is characterized by fear and reluctant submission while by sharp contrast the "new" is characterized by love. That gives me an identity crisis. I don't know where I belong anymore. I had the impression during the few years I was a wife that I was living in love, that the whole thing was an "adventure of growth," a "continuous exchange," an "experience of self-actualization," a "direct participation in the world," and that we as a couple were "on the move." But I was way off. Only the "new" marriage, the "equal partnership," works that way..."