I was frustrated with this book from the first page. The pre-introduction poem mentioned being age 40, and I was confused about who this book was for. The introduction included a comment about plastic straws with no understanding of the accessibility issue in blanket straw bans, and I was insulted. And the deckled edges were REALLY haphazard and made turning pages SO DIFFICULT and it was so hard for me to not be just done by page 8.
Except for the bit where Kirkus called this book "engaging and insightful," I agree with everything in their review. I just fundamentally came to a different conclusion about this book and its merit.
This is a book of poems that purports to be about trash, and litter, and environmentalism. The themes meander into so many other areas that it felt like the book itself was a collection of gathered trash. I'm fine with getting political, especially in works for children, but this was just so disjointed, rambling, and lacking emotion, proper descriptive language, or thematic cohesion.
And then, over and over again, this didn't seem like a book for children, despite being from the Young People's Poet Laureate. Nye calls David Sedaris "one of everyone's favorite writers." But for kids? Really? A poem noticing a discarded pair of underwear seems to hint at rape, or a forgetful sex worker. Many, many poems invoked a "we" that Nye identifies with, that is decidedly privileged, middle aged, white, middle class, etc. "We" don't know what it's like to be homeless. "We" don't know how to make things from scratch. "We" don't want to know what could cause someone to lose undergarments in public. "We" can't help thinking about trash [as opposed to human suffering] during hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes. It just felt, over and over again, that so many kids would read this and think, "Huh, this white lady doesn't get me, and she's judgy as heck." Nye insults an unnamed reader for misinterpreting a previously published poem, because clearly authorial intent is so sacred that we have to call out readers for being wrong and use an ableist slur in the process. Nye mentions plastic straws multiple times, erasing the disabled folks who need them. Nye even declares war on disposable diapers, shaming new parents for making a choice that, yes, is environmentally problematic, but for a host of other reasons might be the best option for a family. And the discussion of family border separations and child abuse comes out of nowhere, with no trigger warning, which is sure to traumatize some child readers.
My final takeaway was just one big "why." For someone so big on environmentalism, this certainly seemed like a waste of paper.