This book is not as scholarly as I was hoping it would be. It reads something like an extended news report on the subject in question (which is a style of writing which has its own merits). The author sets out to argue that the sexual revolution, bringing about the liberation of women, is incomplete. For, though women are now acquiring more freedoms and equalities than ever, they are still unequal Im relations to the obtaining of what they desire sexually and the attaining of sexual pleasure. The author discusses a number of issues in relation to women’s health, sexuality, the nature of desire, sexual abuse and rape, cultural influences, biological aspects, and the wide variety of so-called solutions to the “problem” (she considers whether or not it is a real problem) of “female frigidity” (Freud in the background) and the loss of desire.
This book, though it doesn’t delve deep into some of the philosophical aspects of sexuality and the nature of the female, brings to the forefront à number of prominent 20th century philosophical claims about women, gender, and sexuality, including: the claim that women view their sexuality through the lens of “the Patriarchy”, the role of “power structures”, and that desire is fundamental and determinative of your identity.
One of the most common themes throughout the whole book is the influence of sociology-cultural norms upon how women think, act, desire, and experience life and their own sexuality. It is worth noting, she doesn’t point fingers at, for example, Christianity. Rather, a close reading of her text (in relation to her claims) suggests that if there is a “culprit” behind the social-cultural norms that are affecting women today, it is the combined influence of Victorian era prudishness and Freudian theories about the nature of the female and female sexuality (which have been imbibed by 20th century culture in general, including Christians). She also considers how other causes may contribute to low or declining libido, including abuse/violence related trauma, illness, etc. She considers a number of solutions to low libido (some of which are immoral, some of which could be perfectly acceptable), but, my reading of this text sees her as proposing a “wholistic” solution, engaging body and soul.