I'm going to at least attempt to review each book I read in 2026, I'm aiming for 50 (last year was 80, which I just made at the last minute by reading a bunch of short books).
This one is basically a podcast combined with coaching-therapy sessions as a book, a series of interviews with people who have various problems and who eventually change when they realize that they are the problem rather than (just) everyone else around them.
So it's kind of like a message of 'taking accountability' for oneself, for example there was a gay man who was bullied in church when younger and eventually devolved to sitting on his couch all day and not going outside for weeks, putting a strain on his relationship with his mother who is taking care of him due to him not working or doing any chores and just watching tv all day. The guy blamed the church for his life, rather than himself, but she eventually got him to realize that his own decisions and reactions to his circumstances played a part in how his life ended up, and once he took at least a little responsibility, and begin to see himself as not just a victim, he was able to decide to make some changes to improve his life.
That sort of thing is characteristic of each chapter/interview/session, each one has a slightly different problem, but usually they are the root cause of their own misery, despite also being victims, they learn to take responsibility for improving their life rather than just blaming others.
So it's a fairly classic formula with and old but still important theme. However, it still wasn't perfect in a couple of ways, I've two major complaints: first is the complaint most others have, that this would work better as a podcast than as a book. I don't see the "book" element to this at all. There's no pdf with lessons or strategies to apply to your own life, there's *just* the interviews, and the listener is expected to extract the lesson and apply it to their own life with no actual help from the "author". Which most people *should* be able to do, but many will not.
Second complaint (and I know not all of you will like this complaint) is a very "heterosexual man in his 40s" (me) style complaint: that there were no straight men represented among the dozen or so interviews in the book. There were about 10 or so people/chapters, and it was about 3/4 women, and 1/4 gay men. There were no men who were not gay represented in the book. I know that shouldn't be important, but other groups often talk about how representation is important, so the same applies to the complete absence of a group which is often over-represented in other books. I think this would have helped the theme of the book too, because it'd show that even guys who are in privileged positions in society can learn to take accountability for their own problems; like how much more powerful would the message of the book have been if even a straight guy could realize that he's the problem rather than everyone else, rather than only women and gay men realizing that truth.
So basically as I was listening to the book I was thinking it'd be nice to have like, one token straight guy in the book talking about his own problems, just to make the book more relatable to people like me, but, I probably wasn't really the target audience of the book, so it's not a huge complaint, it's just that with 1) that issue, and 2) the issue of the book feeling like a podcast, and 3) that there's no actual theory or discussion of the ideas of the book except through the lens of interviews, I have to dock one star, but it's still a highly enjoyable 4/5 book that is not at all similar to the typical self-help book, and a good start for the first book I completed this year.
Actually, all of her books that I've read so far are 4/5 books for me. She very consistently seems to write great self-help books that often have a few things I don't like that keep them out of being impeccable masterpieces (though I still have a few of her books to go, I've now read the majority of her books). But that itself can be seen as something special, I can't think of any other author (nonfiction or fiction) who consistently writes "almost perfect" books. Even my favorite authors (like Haruki Murakami), who can create masterpiece after masterpiece, still have a few lackluster books that I'd rate 3/5. So Mel Robbins may be the most consistently "great, but not perfect" author I can think of.