The message here is very simple and could be described briefly as:
The most effective way students retain information is by trying to recall it without assistance.
And the most effective way to have them recall information (‘retrieve’ in the book) is to space out the exercises over time. Cramming is great for short term retention, terrible for long-term retention of knowledge.
That’s it. The style of the book is like a self-help book, and like a self-help book there is a simple message couched in a couple hundred pages of fluff. This is why I gave the book a low rating. The recall/retrieval idea is great, and seems to work. But there’s so much filler.
They also invent fancy terms where simple ones would do, presumably to make the ideas seem more substantial: ‘Feedback-driven metacognition’ is their term for letting students figure out for themselves how much of the class content they’ve learned. Or even more painful are ‘fun’ terms; a rambling conversation (to encourage students to recall information without pressure) is framed as ‘Let’s learn OUTformation not just INformation’. Pausing for note taking is ‘stop and jots’.
This all seems unnecessary as theirs is a solid idea with a practical ways to implement it. For my part, I designed my own course and have a terrible time getting my 7-12 year olds to remember any of it, so this was an extremely useful message. And in the early part of the book, there are practical ways to conduct information recall with the students:
• Simple quiz at the end of each lesson.
• Random mini quiz on slips. Put questions covering class content on individual slips of paper. Hand out randomly to students, one question per student. Get them to write the answers then immediately after (or next lesson) discuss all answers in class.
• Free recall (Brain dumps): Pause lesson and ask students to write down everything they can remember so far. This can be improved by sharing in pairs afterward: What did we both write down, what did we both forget, what did we write down wrong?
• Two things. Less disruptive, get all students to write down – What are two things you learned today? What are two things you learned last lesson? Two things you’d like to learn more about? No need to collect papers or look at the answers, just write down and move on. If the students think it’s strange the teacher isn’t looking at the answers, tell them directly it’s a learning strategy to help them (could also be used as future notes) and can ask some of them to share in groups or pairs what they wrote down.
• Most interesting thing. Actually meant for secondary school kids, where instead of writing notes during class, the class is paused and they write ‘retrieval notes’. A variation which would work for elementary age is at the end of the lesson to ask ‘what is the most interesting thing you learned today?’ and get them to write it down. In the book this is also known as an ‘outcome statement’.
• Quizzes as bell work or exit tickets. Hand out slips with one question to students entering (or as an exit ticket before they leave). It could be about any content of the course.
• True/False cards. Hand out coloured cards to every student with true and false, or ABCD, or 1,2,3 etc on them. Ask the class a question and get everyone to simultaneously hold up the card they think is the answer. This is a way of doing group multiple choice but keeping it as an active class activity, rather than yet another written test.
• Mini whiteboard. Put blank paper in a plastic folder, and give one to each student. Call out questions that only require one word answers, and get them to write it down on the mini whiteboard then hold it up for you to see.
• BBQ (Big Basket Quiz). At the end of a series of classes (a week for regular school, a month for Saturday classes), have a big quiz that repeats questions from across the last four or five lessons AND questions from before that. Make the question selection random (the basket), and discuss the answers.
• Power Ticket. A grid. There are three rows for the students to fill in: Fact one, two, and three. Along the top are a series of columns: What we learned about today (The Cuban Missile Crisis), yesterday (Cold War Alliances) all the way through to last semester (Ancient Rome). The students have to fill in as much as they can.
As mentioned, cramming is a bad way to learn – space all of this recall practice out as much as possible. And secondly this recall practice should not just focus on the last thing learned but draw on the entire course (something they call ‘interweaving’). Also useful is putting information in different contexts, though this is only alluded to and not stated explicitly.
Why is recalling information the most effective learning method, more than going over lesson content repeatedly?
It does two things – it reinforces in the mind what has already been learned, and it helps to mentally reorganise information.
Particularly eye-opening was how ineffectual ‘cold calling’ (asking random students a question about previously learned content) is, because the one or two students answering may benefit from recalling information, but the rest of the class is switched off. I always assumed everyone would be nervously going through the answer in their head, but the reality is that if someone else is answering then they assume the pressure is off, and just stop engaging.