One of the major shortcomings of the Anglo-Saxon judicial system is the way every court case, regardless of significance or complexity, is eventually reduced to one or two words: 'guilty' or 'not guilty'. This book presents some of the arguments of both prosecution and defence in the case against Penguin Books, an attempt to prevent the publication of D.H. Lawrence's "Lady Chatterley's Lover" in 1960 because of its alleged pornographic nature. Although some of the witnesses for the defence, among them members of the clergy, put forth interesting arguments about the literary merits of "Lady Chatterley's Lover", and some amusing insight into 1960's Britain is offered, this book is a bit of a letdown; the major reason is the complete lack of information about the way the jury reached a verdict in this case - there's not even a reference to the amount of time it took the jury to reach that verdict.
"Lady Chatterley's Trial" is an abridged version of "The Trial of Lady Chatterley"; the above criticism may not apply to the unabbreviated version.