What do you think?
Rate this book
The Byzantine World War
The Crusades shook the world. But why did they happen?
Their origins are revealed in a new light. As part of a medieval world war that stretched from Asia to Europe. At its centre was an ancient empire – Byzantium.
Told for the first time as a single, linked narrative are three great events that changed history: the fall of Byzantium in the eleventh century, the epic campaign of the First Crusade and the origins of modern Turkey.
Nick Holmes not only presents the First Crusade in a wider global context but he also puts forwards new interpretations of the original sources, suggesting that its success was in fact largely accidental, and that the central role of Byzantium in the Crusades has been underestimated.
Their origins are revealed in a new light. As part of a medieval world war that stretched from Asia to Europe. At its centre was an ancient empire – Byzantium.
Told for the first time as a single, linked narrative are three great events that changed history: the fall of Byzantium in the eleventh century, the epic campaign of the First Crusade and the origins of modern Turkey.
Nick Holmes not only presents the First Crusade in a wider global context but he also puts forwards new interpretations of the original sources, suggesting that its success was in fact largely accidental, and that the central role of Byzantium in the Crusades has been underestimated.
211 pages, Paperback
Published May 28, 2019
292 people are currently reading
3075 people want to read
About the author
Nick Holmes
8 books92 followersHello, I'm a British author, podcaster, and historian, and welcome to my series of books on the Fall Of The Roman Empire. My passion is Roman history. I've wandered among the ruins of the Roman Forum and wondered what happened to this great civilisation? I've stared into the dome of Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, and reflected on how the Roman Empire lasted for centuries after Rome itself was sacked, even when its capital moved to Constantinople. So, I've embarked on writing the full account of this momentous time.
Immerse yourself in this incredible story. It may surprise you to find that those events so long ago are strangely relevant to our modern times, from the changing climate to religion, and from war to peace. Let us listen to the voices from the past.
And if you like podcasts, try mine "The Fall of the Roman Empire", which accompanies my books, and please check out my website which offers a free book and much more at www.nickholmesauthor.com
Immerse yourself in this incredible story. It may surprise you to find that those events so long ago are strangely relevant to our modern times, from the changing climate to religion, and from war to peace. Let us listen to the voices from the past.
And if you like podcasts, try mine "The Fall of the Roman Empire", which accompanies my books, and please check out my website which offers a free book and much more at www.nickholmesauthor.com
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 59 reviews
November 30, 2020
4 "elegant, succicnt, impressive" stars !!
Thanks to Netgalley, the author and Matador for an e-copy in exchange for my honest review. This book was released in May 2019.
Wow. That was an epic ride through late eleventh/early twelfth century Byzantine and Middle Eastern history that covered both the reign and rule of Romanus Diogenes and the First Crusade.
Mr. Holmes is an amateur historian who has done a lot of travel, research and thinking into this most interesting time period. I am (truly) amazed as he was able to impart a great deal of conflicting information in a fascinating, balanced yet nuanced way in a relatively short book.
He is able to describe the politics, sociology and enmesh them in an understandable way to readers who know little of this area or time period and make it both thought-provoking and fascinating.
He takes us into royal intrigues, alliances, betrayal and in brief broad strokes the military battles fought during this time period. Throughout the book there are timelines, maps, diagrams, pictures and a foreward of the main historical players. This added immensely to the readability and enjoyment of this most intriguing book.
Mr. Holmes, I could tell that this was an intense labor of love for you and this reader thanks you for bringing it to fruition.
Here is a sculpture of Romanus Diogenes
Thanks to Netgalley, the author and Matador for an e-copy in exchange for my honest review. This book was released in May 2019.
Wow. That was an epic ride through late eleventh/early twelfth century Byzantine and Middle Eastern history that covered both the reign and rule of Romanus Diogenes and the First Crusade.
Mr. Holmes is an amateur historian who has done a lot of travel, research and thinking into this most interesting time period. I am (truly) amazed as he was able to impart a great deal of conflicting information in a fascinating, balanced yet nuanced way in a relatively short book.
He is able to describe the politics, sociology and enmesh them in an understandable way to readers who know little of this area or time period and make it both thought-provoking and fascinating.
He takes us into royal intrigues, alliances, betrayal and in brief broad strokes the military battles fought during this time period. Throughout the book there are timelines, maps, diagrams, pictures and a foreward of the main historical players. This added immensely to the readability and enjoyment of this most intriguing book.
Mr. Holmes, I could tell that this was an intense labor of love for you and this reader thanks you for bringing it to fruition.
Here is a sculpture of Romanus Diogenes
August 7, 2021
Holmes writes a vivid, intense and action-packed account of the final decades of the Eastern Roman empire: Byzantium. More fine-grained to the events than Judith Herrin's Byzantium: The Surprising Life of a Medieval Empire and with a different perspective than Tom Holland's In the Shadow of the Sword: The Battle for Global Empire and the End of the Ancient World, which focuses both on the longer view of the rise of Islam and the view from that side, the author also does an excellent job of arguing that both Big Trends and individual people shape the course of history - for example, that the First Crusade wouldn't have stood a chance if not for the fragmentation of the Seljuk Empire, but how the brilliance of certain leaders and the betrayals and political manoeuvring of others lead to certain pivotal events. He also writes with a flair for the descriptions of battle that, unlike some specifically military historians, doesn't get bogged down in the minutiae.
January 26, 2020
The Byzantine Empire was a world power during the 11th century. This book is a thorough examination of the historical facts of the empire’s decline: a military conflict with the Seljuk Turks, internal conflict, and the onslaught of the Crusades. Holmes delves into the idea that the success of the Crusades was largely due to the timing as the Byzantine Empire was in the midst of its fall.
The introduction of the book was fantastic: a narrative of an attack in Constantinople. The rest of the book is far more informational, though rather than being dry information like most historical nonfiction, the style is more lively and interesting. There are several sources that Holmes uses to make his assertions, and are well referenced. Some things could have been a little more examined, so it seems like the book is meant more as an introduction to the 11th century Byzantines rather than a full in depth picture of the empire. It was very well done, in my opinion, even though I’m not a big nonfiction fan. 4 stars.
The introduction of the book was fantastic: a narrative of an attack in Constantinople. The rest of the book is far more informational, though rather than being dry information like most historical nonfiction, the style is more lively and interesting. There are several sources that Holmes uses to make his assertions, and are well referenced. Some things could have been a little more examined, so it seems like the book is meant more as an introduction to the 11th century Byzantines rather than a full in depth picture of the empire. It was very well done, in my opinion, even though I’m not a big nonfiction fan. 4 stars.
June 19, 2019
I am a history aficionado. Admittedly, I haven’t read many history books in the last year or so, so I was eager to dive back in. I am glad I chose, The Byzantine World War. Anatolia, Byzantium, The Ottoman Empire, Turkey…this region is steeped in history and culture and has always fascinated me. Author Nick Homes does a superb job telling the story of the fall of Byzantium, the First Crusade and the modern origins of Turkey. His writing style, rather than dry and monotonous like many history books, is conversational and engaging. I especially appreciated the comprehensive yet succinct chronology of the Byzantine Empire and the list of rulers by year included at the end of the book.
August 16, 2019
The Byzantine World War charts for the most part the events of the 11th Century that would result in the Roman (Byzantine) loss of it Anatolia territories to the Seljuk Turks! The book illustrates the events around and leading up to the the titanic battle of Manzikert under the Emperor Romanus IV Diogenes and what the consequences were for the Roman State and that period! The book then takes us through the famous call to the west which leads directly into the first crusades which ironically come to bite the Romans in the back by AD 1204!
The Byzantine World War is concise and charts these events from the trial of Romanus onwards! The book is excellently reference charting events from multiple sources giving us a very balanced approach to the the character who involved in the events from Romanus himself, the Empress Eudocia, the Doukai family and the people who confronted the Empire. Holmes narrative approach works brilliantly both as an introduction to the Roman Empire at this time but as well rounded argument for the those with more pre-existing knowledge. His approach to Romanus is certainly a different take on the person than you see in some other accounts. As the author points out one can detect the hand of the Doukai in this, there reach certainly does go far!
Holmes arguments that Romanus was not the weak Emperor often portrayed are strong. An Emperor with an established military record before taking on the top job, who not only revives the Eastern Army of the Empire and then leads it not only in territorial conquest but then takes on the Turks directly certainly knows his business! From my own experience I agree with this interpretation Manzikert's significance to the rest of the of the world and the consequences of the battle cannot be underestimated! Holmes portrayals of the battle of Manzikert and the lead up to it to are visceral with the description of the reformed Roman army moving out, with all the traditions and long history to the eventual battle at Manzikert and the strategy and tactics deployed, as well as the sheer scale of the battle itself, give you a great description of the events! At the same time you get a real feel for how desperate Romanus's position was! The aftermath of Manzikert is also explained in clear concise unflinching way that give us an direct insight into the cut-throat politics of the time with Doukai really going to town.
The fallout from the battle of Manzikert is neatly covered as well as we see the rise of the Comneni Emperors as well and the events of when Alexius gets himself up on the throne The Byzantine War really shows the state the Empire is in when they call for aid! This of course leads us into the events of the First Crusade where the book shows clearly how the Romans situation and the objectives of the First Crusade were intrinsically tied to the Roman Empires fortunes. The book cleverly shows us the politics and personal ambitions behind these events as well from Alexius's dealing to and use of the First Crusade to regain lost territories to Bohemond and is opportunism! It is also highly amusing to to see how the Saxon's and Normans all end up in the Romans camp throughout! Though also the showing of the Normans ambitions puts other events such as he battle of Hastings into more of a global depiction as well as the Norman's really were into carving kingdoms and the books descriptions and portrayals of the Normans really gets that across.
The The Byzantine World War by Holmes provides a no holds barred look at the events of the 11th Century in the Roman State and it connecting territories. The style of the book is straight forward and easily readable but does assume the reader knows something of the period but even then The Byzantine Wars does take the time to explain the earlier history of the Empire as the political and military structures that are in place. The Byzantine Wars style itself does lend itself to the events and the description are evocative of the time! It succeeds as not only a debate on the issues at the time but gives a more balanced approach to Romanus and his ambitions and shows that only simply dumb luck with topping of treason resulted in the loss at Manzikert! The Byzantine War is eminently approachable and a great take on the events grab when it when you can!
The Byzantine World War is concise and charts these events from the trial of Romanus onwards! The book is excellently reference charting events from multiple sources giving us a very balanced approach to the the character who involved in the events from Romanus himself, the Empress Eudocia, the Doukai family and the people who confronted the Empire. Holmes narrative approach works brilliantly both as an introduction to the Roman Empire at this time but as well rounded argument for the those with more pre-existing knowledge. His approach to Romanus is certainly a different take on the person than you see in some other accounts. As the author points out one can detect the hand of the Doukai in this, there reach certainly does go far!
Holmes arguments that Romanus was not the weak Emperor often portrayed are strong. An Emperor with an established military record before taking on the top job, who not only revives the Eastern Army of the Empire and then leads it not only in territorial conquest but then takes on the Turks directly certainly knows his business! From my own experience I agree with this interpretation Manzikert's significance to the rest of the of the world and the consequences of the battle cannot be underestimated! Holmes portrayals of the battle of Manzikert and the lead up to it to are visceral with the description of the reformed Roman army moving out, with all the traditions and long history to the eventual battle at Manzikert and the strategy and tactics deployed, as well as the sheer scale of the battle itself, give you a great description of the events! At the same time you get a real feel for how desperate Romanus's position was! The aftermath of Manzikert is also explained in clear concise unflinching way that give us an direct insight into the cut-throat politics of the time with Doukai really going to town.
The fallout from the battle of Manzikert is neatly covered as well as we see the rise of the Comneni Emperors as well and the events of when Alexius gets himself up on the throne The Byzantine War really shows the state the Empire is in when they call for aid! This of course leads us into the events of the First Crusade where the book shows clearly how the Romans situation and the objectives of the First Crusade were intrinsically tied to the Roman Empires fortunes. The book cleverly shows us the politics and personal ambitions behind these events as well from Alexius's dealing to and use of the First Crusade to regain lost territories to Bohemond and is opportunism! It is also highly amusing to to see how the Saxon's and Normans all end up in the Romans camp throughout! Though also the showing of the Normans ambitions puts other events such as he battle of Hastings into more of a global depiction as well as the Norman's really were into carving kingdoms and the books descriptions and portrayals of the Normans really gets that across.
The The Byzantine World War by Holmes provides a no holds barred look at the events of the 11th Century in the Roman State and it connecting territories. The style of the book is straight forward and easily readable but does assume the reader knows something of the period but even then The Byzantine Wars does take the time to explain the earlier history of the Empire as the political and military structures that are in place. The Byzantine Wars style itself does lend itself to the events and the description are evocative of the time! It succeeds as not only a debate on the issues at the time but gives a more balanced approach to Romanus and his ambitions and shows that only simply dumb luck with topping of treason resulted in the loss at Manzikert! The Byzantine War is eminently approachable and a great take on the events grab when it when you can!
July 25, 2019
The oddly titled Byzantine World War mostly covers the rule of Emperor Romanos IV Diogenes and his betrayal and untimely death at the hands of the Doukas family, which led to the demise of the Eastern Roman Empire. The book continues with a brief continuation into the Crusades, with the Fourth Crusade actually sacking Constantinople, the Empire's seat of power. Oddly titled because the battles and politics were centred around the Levant and modern day Turkey - European and Islamic mercenaries were used, such as Saxons, Normans, Franks and the Uzes, but a 'world war' is a adding marketing grandeur!
This is an excellent book. Holmes's style is chatty without being whimsical, and his conclusions are garnered from multiple sources, even contradicting some well-established theories. I especially enjoyed the political back story running throughout, how incompetent, self-serving schemers were willing to destroy a leader even though he was the last hope of a declining empire. It reminded me of the UK's Brexit - populist politicians whipping up the country to commit national suicide.
A very good book, very readable, and very engaging.
Book supplied by Netgalley for an honest review.
This is an excellent book. Holmes's style is chatty without being whimsical, and his conclusions are garnered from multiple sources, even contradicting some well-established theories. I especially enjoyed the political back story running throughout, how incompetent, self-serving schemers were willing to destroy a leader even though he was the last hope of a declining empire. It reminded me of the UK's Brexit - populist politicians whipping up the country to commit national suicide.
A very good book, very readable, and very engaging.
Book supplied by Netgalley for an honest review.
June 26, 2019
This book delivers exactly what it promises; a quick, well-researched, clearly written book on the origins of the Crusades and the importance of the Byzantine Empire.
As a United States historian I didn't know much beyond the basics of the Crusades and the Eastern Roman Empire before starting this. I'm amazed at how much information Holmes was able to fit into so few pages. I loved the depth of knowledge provided in a short read. The comparisons to a world war were interesting and the first holocaust was something I had never heard of before.
I enjoyed the sometimes informality that this was written with, it made some parts read like historical fiction which helps the reader retain the information and not lose interest. Now it was more military heavy than I personally like and some parts were clearly better developed than others but it all came together well.
The maps, character guides, pictures, and timelines were great and overall I really enjoyed this book! I read it in a day and learned so much about the topic.
I received a complementary copy of this book through Netgalley. Opinions expressed in this review are completely my own.
As a United States historian I didn't know much beyond the basics of the Crusades and the Eastern Roman Empire before starting this. I'm amazed at how much information Holmes was able to fit into so few pages. I loved the depth of knowledge provided in a short read. The comparisons to a world war were interesting and the first holocaust was something I had never heard of before.
I enjoyed the sometimes informality that this was written with, it made some parts read like historical fiction which helps the reader retain the information and not lose interest. Now it was more military heavy than I personally like and some parts were clearly better developed than others but it all came together well.
The maps, character guides, pictures, and timelines were great and overall I really enjoyed this book! I read it in a day and learned so much about the topic.
I received a complementary copy of this book through Netgalley. Opinions expressed in this review are completely my own.
August 30, 2022
This account takes us through 20 years of the struggle by the East Roman ("Byzantine') leaders to shore up their domains as threats rolled in from east and west. We see how this great power crumbled, largely due to its own mistakes. Most interestingly, the author looks at how the Seljuks, who ended up inflicting mortal wounds on the empire, were not even much interested in this struggle to begin with. They were focussed on fighting the Fatimids of Egypt. And so they may well have done, leaving Byzantium largely intact for some time yet for all one knows. The Pope may have never made the famous call to help and therefore there would have. been no Crusades.
This might seem an obscure time to read about for many. But many What Ifs of history hinge on these years, these leaders, and the decisions they made. And so much of that spun on Byzantine palace plotting and acts of treachery. This account gives the Battle of Manzikert even greater import than I'd realised. Fascinating
This might seem an obscure time to read about for many. But many What Ifs of history hinge on these years, these leaders, and the decisions they made. And so much of that spun on Byzantine palace plotting and acts of treachery. This account gives the Battle of Manzikert even greater import than I'd realised. Fascinating
July 27, 2021
Readable account of the years leading up to the first Crusades. The book focuses most of its narrative outlining how the Byzantine Empire saw itself weakened by coups and treachery, and details the events that lead to the collapse of its eastern and southern frontiers. The narrative changes focus in the last third of the book, discussing how the Empire came to be somewhat of a bystander between the clash of Western and Muslim armies in the Crusades.
January 27, 2021
A very interesting account of Emperor Romanus Diogenes and the Battle of Manzikert. I felt very immersed in the struggles he had to contend with.
Felt that the First Crusade part could have referred more to what the Byzantines were doing. Considering the book is called 'The Byzantine World War'... you can read accounts of the First Crusade in other books dedicated to that.
Felt that the First Crusade part could have referred more to what the Byzantines were doing. Considering the book is called 'The Byzantine World War'... you can read accounts of the First Crusade in other books dedicated to that.
January 24, 2021
A great story about the events that led to the undermining of the Byzantine authority in Anatolia, The First Crusade and, centuries later, the fall of the last stronghold of the Eastern Roman Empire, the mighty Constantinople, the only city that was comparable to Rome at that time.
February 26, 2023
An amazing historical epic story that reads like fantasy but is so true that you can Google all the facts and experience them for yourself. The only reason I didn't give it five stars was that I wanted color maps.
November 25, 2019
About The Author
Nick Holmes is a graduate of Cambridge University with degree in history. He was entranced by the ancient walls that circle Istanbul, Turkey and became intrigued with Byzantium following a trip to the region. The juxtaposition of the modern and the ancient engaged him and surprised him. The massive escarpments over a thousand years old decorate the city with imposing battlements. Hagia Sophia, a key location in the events that transpire in his book still stands in testament to the events of the past that still color our world today. Holmes finds the important role of Constantinople and the fulcrum around which Europe and the Near East pivot to be a wonderful backdrop of the events that took place so long ago. Nick posits the importance of the period beginning in 1068 that leads to the First, of several, Crusades and its effect on modern history.
The Target Audience
If you are the kind of person that loves to read history books that are not dry and stuffy, but engaging and conversational, then look no further. The Author, Nick Holmes shares a style of writing not so different from Simon Winchester or Erik Larson. Well-constructed, and set in an important time in world history, Holmes posits his opinion on the what, when, and how of the now distant history. The Byzantine World War, is a perfect fit for teenagers or adults bookshelf, and is a must read for anyone who enjoys intelligently constructed concepts set against the context of tumultuous times, and their events.
The Book
The Byzantium World War is set at a time when the power of Rome was beginning to ebb and the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) was beginning. Some of the Key locations of historic importance include; Anatolia, Byzantium, The Middle East, The Balkans, The Caucuses, and North Africa. The timeline is 1068-1097 and is written almost as a thriller in its style. The range of characters is extensive, and Holmes does a masterful job in recreating them and their foibles for the modern audience. It is a must read for all those who want to extend their knowledge of pivotal historic events, and for those who enjoy their history made three-dimensional, easily consumed.
In Conclusion
This book is a great primer for those who are looking to increase their knowledge of the rise of Turkey in the form of the Pax Ottomana, and the fall of Pax Romana. The book is written in an easily accessible style, in a clear, chronological order, and illustrated with images, maps and detailed timelines. It is an engaging look at past events that still have influence over our period of history. I like to see a more extensive referencing and bibliography, as well as the addition of some footnotes. That said, I did enjoy the fact that the key players in the book are listed at the rear for examination. I really enjoyed reading this book and I have no hesitation in recommending it highly. It is a rare treat in the world of dusty, dry history books that such a pleasantly written, brief but comprehensive volume comes along. Although I received this book for review; I loved it so much, I bought a copy for my library.
My thanks go out to the following: NetGalley, Matador Publishers, and Amazon Digital Services LLC, for affording me the opportunity to read this rare gem.
Nick Holmes is a graduate of Cambridge University with degree in history. He was entranced by the ancient walls that circle Istanbul, Turkey and became intrigued with Byzantium following a trip to the region. The juxtaposition of the modern and the ancient engaged him and surprised him. The massive escarpments over a thousand years old decorate the city with imposing battlements. Hagia Sophia, a key location in the events that transpire in his book still stands in testament to the events of the past that still color our world today. Holmes finds the important role of Constantinople and the fulcrum around which Europe and the Near East pivot to be a wonderful backdrop of the events that took place so long ago. Nick posits the importance of the period beginning in 1068 that leads to the First, of several, Crusades and its effect on modern history.
The Target Audience
If you are the kind of person that loves to read history books that are not dry and stuffy, but engaging and conversational, then look no further. The Author, Nick Holmes shares a style of writing not so different from Simon Winchester or Erik Larson. Well-constructed, and set in an important time in world history, Holmes posits his opinion on the what, when, and how of the now distant history. The Byzantine World War, is a perfect fit for teenagers or adults bookshelf, and is a must read for anyone who enjoys intelligently constructed concepts set against the context of tumultuous times, and their events.
The Book
The Byzantium World War is set at a time when the power of Rome was beginning to ebb and the Ottoman Empire (Turkey) was beginning. Some of the Key locations of historic importance include; Anatolia, Byzantium, The Middle East, The Balkans, The Caucuses, and North Africa. The timeline is 1068-1097 and is written almost as a thriller in its style. The range of characters is extensive, and Holmes does a masterful job in recreating them and their foibles for the modern audience. It is a must read for all those who want to extend their knowledge of pivotal historic events, and for those who enjoy their history made three-dimensional, easily consumed.
In Conclusion
This book is a great primer for those who are looking to increase their knowledge of the rise of Turkey in the form of the Pax Ottomana, and the fall of Pax Romana. The book is written in an easily accessible style, in a clear, chronological order, and illustrated with images, maps and detailed timelines. It is an engaging look at past events that still have influence over our period of history. I like to see a more extensive referencing and bibliography, as well as the addition of some footnotes. That said, I did enjoy the fact that the key players in the book are listed at the rear for examination. I really enjoyed reading this book and I have no hesitation in recommending it highly. It is a rare treat in the world of dusty, dry history books that such a pleasantly written, brief but comprehensive volume comes along. Although I received this book for review; I loved it so much, I bought a copy for my library.
My thanks go out to the following: NetGalley, Matador Publishers, and Amazon Digital Services LLC, for affording me the opportunity to read this rare gem.
July 25, 2019
For someone with a little bit of knowledge on the Byzantine empire, this was a fantastic introduction. Holmes' delivers a brief and well researched account of the 11th century Byzantines with their feud against the neighboring Seljuk Turks, as well as their own internal struggles against one another. I found the book very well put together, and one easy to keep up with everything because of a plethora of maps and a list of historical characters. What I greatly appreciated is that Holmes interpreted historical accounts, using a variety of sources. This helped cast an idea of what might have happened in events that are unknown. The majority of this book covers turning points in the Byzantine empire's downfall, the Crusades, and military conflict with Seljuk Turks.
All in all, this is a great start for someone wanting to learn more about the Byzantine empire, or the events during the 11th century.
Thank you to Nick Holmes, Matador, and Goodreads for providing me with a review copy.
All in all, this is a great start for someone wanting to learn more about the Byzantine empire, or the events during the 11th century.
Thank you to Nick Holmes, Matador, and Goodreads for providing me with a review copy.
September 10, 2019
I received this book for free via Goodreads Giveaway.
This was a rather interesting read, and came across very story-like and easy to get in to. It focuses from about 1068 with Romanus to the First Crusade in 1097, with a small chapter over the Crusades at the end. There is a lot of information packed into this book, but it wasn't dragged down for it, and it was fascinating to me, since this isn't my main interest when it comes to history. I enjoyed the author mentioning some of the other historians views in the acknowledgements and then talking about newer translations coming to light which seemed to create a more balanced view then just "the victors write history" view, which is so common.
This was a rather interesting read, and came across very story-like and easy to get in to. It focuses from about 1068 with Romanus to the First Crusade in 1097, with a small chapter over the Crusades at the end. There is a lot of information packed into this book, but it wasn't dragged down for it, and it was fascinating to me, since this isn't my main interest when it comes to history. I enjoyed the author mentioning some of the other historians views in the acknowledgements and then talking about newer translations coming to light which seemed to create a more balanced view then just "the victors write history" view, which is so common.
July 13, 2021
Based on Michael Attaleiates' little known chronicle, this book reconstructs the forgotten chapter of world history that led to the First Crusade. Given the length of the book, some oversimplification of historical narratives inevitably creeps in, which is the only fault I can find (and the maps, which are not well-produced in scale). It is a worthy effort to reappraise the character and the role of Emperor Romanos Diogenes.
August 7, 2019
Having minimal knowledge of the Byzantine empire, I
found this book quite interesting. The depictions and the information presented are relatable in this well-written book.
found this book quite interesting. The depictions and the information presented are relatable in this well-written book.
September 26, 2022
A vivid book, fascinating, written with great understanding of the region and its history.
September 13, 2021
This was interesting reading and certainly filled gaps in my knowledge concerning the Byzantine Empire and the reasons for its decline. I would label it a competent history though no flashes of brilliance in the writing.
June 23, 2019
The war that is mentioned as a world war is mainly from just before the First Crusade to just after the fall of the Crusader Kingdoms (in the late 1200s). Though Byzantium (the Eastern Roman Empire) didn't fall until 1453, after the fall of the Crusaders, the Byzantine's had lost the homeland of Anatolia and were just the area around Constantinople, with mercenary armies to protect them.
The main coverage is a narrative of the beginning of the ERE continually losing more and more of their easternmost empire to the Seljek Turks. After the fall of the Crusader Kingdoms, the Turks were constantly attacking across Armenia and Cappadocia. After the defeat of ERE at the Battle of Manikurt, the Seljuks began to slowly absorb the ERE lands of Eastern Anatolia.
The narrative of the First Crusades and the building of the Latin Kingdoms in the Outrmere (the Holy land, Antioch, Nicea and Syria), that only lasted one hundred years, after which the Holy Land was lost. The Second Crusade didn't even make it to Jerusalem. The Fourth Crusade led to the sacking of Constantinople in 1200, marked the end of the ERE, they were just waiting for the last walls to be destroyed.
The main coverage is a narrative of the beginning of the ERE continually losing more and more of their easternmost empire to the Seljek Turks. After the fall of the Crusader Kingdoms, the Turks were constantly attacking across Armenia and Cappadocia. After the defeat of ERE at the Battle of Manikurt, the Seljuks began to slowly absorb the ERE lands of Eastern Anatolia.
The narrative of the First Crusades and the building of the Latin Kingdoms in the Outrmere (the Holy land, Antioch, Nicea and Syria), that only lasted one hundred years, after which the Holy Land was lost. The Second Crusade didn't even make it to Jerusalem. The Fourth Crusade led to the sacking of Constantinople in 1200, marked the end of the ERE, they were just waiting for the last walls to be destroyed.
September 4, 2019
The Byzantine World War describes the struggle between the Byzantine Empire and the Seljuk Turks during the eleventh century, and the events of the First Crusade that arose following the Emperor Alexius Comnenus's appeal to the West for aid.
While the events of the First Crusade have been examined in great detail by historians, Nick Holmes sets them within the context of the larger struggle for dominion in Eastern Europe and Asia, highlighting the impact of the fractured politics of Byzantium on individual battles, picking out the critical moments as the balance of power ebbs and flows and, in particular, reassessing the failure of the emperor Romanus IV Diogenes, whom, he suggests, might have stemmed the Turkish tide but for betrayal from within the Byzantium nobility.
There's an array of colourful characters: emperors, sultans, kings ,popes, caliphs, nobles, war lords and mercenaries. I would have preferred a little more background on some of them and a little less detail of the individual battles. In places, also, I felt the tone could have been more objective. Nonetheless, this is a well-researched and vivid account of one of the defining conflicts in world history.
While the events of the First Crusade have been examined in great detail by historians, Nick Holmes sets them within the context of the larger struggle for dominion in Eastern Europe and Asia, highlighting the impact of the fractured politics of Byzantium on individual battles, picking out the critical moments as the balance of power ebbs and flows and, in particular, reassessing the failure of the emperor Romanus IV Diogenes, whom, he suggests, might have stemmed the Turkish tide but for betrayal from within the Byzantium nobility.
There's an array of colourful characters: emperors, sultans, kings ,popes, caliphs, nobles, war lords and mercenaries. I would have preferred a little more background on some of them and a little less detail of the individual battles. In places, also, I felt the tone could have been more objective. Nonetheless, this is a well-researched and vivid account of one of the defining conflicts in world history.
March 30, 2021
This was good but not great at explaining the fall of the Byzantine Empire (although the city state survived) and the situation at the beginning of the first crusade. The author is more on the "individuals shape history" vs. demographic or economic trends side, but it did seem pretty clear that some internal-to-empire political drama was a major factor.
(Also always weird reading about the Byzantines -- a mix of classical, church, and weird middle eastern insanity (they're not the only part of the world which is crazy, but when they're crazy, it tends to be in a specific way). Poking people's eyes out for betrayal (and then having them die of infection, often) seems like a weird place to end up -- direct execution seems a lot more reasonable.)
(Also always weird reading about the Byzantines -- a mix of classical, church, and weird middle eastern insanity (they're not the only part of the world which is crazy, but when they're crazy, it tends to be in a specific way). Poking people's eyes out for betrayal (and then having them die of infection, often) seems like a weird place to end up -- direct execution seems a lot more reasonable.)
October 27, 2021
This book describes the pivotal stages in the fall of the Eastern Roman empire – Byzantium. The historic outcome is depressing if you sympathise with the Byzantines, but the story telling was excellent. This book covered the history very quickly (especially compared to someone like Norwich), and this made the reading all the easier and more enjoyable. I found myself almost feeling guilty as the book read more like a novel than a history book. I appreciate the more recent scholarship employed by the author, as well as his (not-novel-like) commentary regarding the accuracy and bias of the different sources. This would be an excellent book for someone mostly new to the history and period portrayed.
May 13, 2024
I got this book a few years ago but started reading it after a trip to Greece I went on where I visited the Byzantine museum in Athens. Nick Holmes documents the build up to the First Crusade, with the main focus being on the reign of Romanus IV Diogenes. Holmes’ makes a good argument in showing how Romanus was one of the last warrior emperors of Byzantium, who was betrayed by backstabbing nobles and rewritten as power hungry and incapable of rule. I enjoyed Holmes’ style of writing and would definitely recommend this book to anyone interested in Byzantine history and that of the first crusade.
November 13, 2021
A useful starting point
For those new to Byzantine history and the first Crusade, this book is a useful starting point. Well written and easy to read, it brings to life the key characters. However it is only an introduction, there are more scrapbooks on this topic which you should read following on from this book.
For those new to Byzantine history and the first Crusade, this book is a useful starting point. Well written and easy to read, it brings to life the key characters. However it is only an introduction, there are more scrapbooks on this topic which you should read following on from this book.
October 14, 2021
I enjoyed this book, after the Crusade through Arab Eyes and many histories from the Western point of view, Nick Holmes puts the Crusades in the Eastern Roman context. My largest critique is that the book feels very short considering the material it has to work with.
June 15, 2019
Excellent !
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
November 16, 2019
Summary:
An interesting and thought-provoking overview of that most enigmatic of empires, Byzantium. It deals specifically with the hundred years or so before and including the First Crusade, and makes a compelling argument to treat the desperate defence of Byzantium, and the prosecution of the Crusade as the real first world war.
Main Characters:
Romanus Diogenes: 1068-71: A warrior Emperor, who fought the battle of Manzikert, but was betrayed.
Michael Doukas: Emperor who followed Diogenes. The most apt comparison would be chalk & cheese.
Alp Arslan: Seljuk Sultan who opposed Diogenes at Manzikert.
Basil II: 976-1025: Emperor before Diogenes.
Minor Characters:
Pope Urban II: He called for the First Crusade, 1095.
Tughril: Great Sultan, 1038-1063.
Plot:
Byzantium, with its capital Constantinople, has always fascinated me. It has an intensely complex history, and some of the greatest characters to have lived.
In this novel, the author tells of the events leading up to the First Crusade, in the eleventh century. He breaks the book into two sections, the first dealing with the decline of the Empire in the hundred years or so from Basil II, then to the role that Byzantium played in the build-up to the First Crusade.
The book is concise, and gives a clear timeline, with enough information on the characters and events as they play out to make the events come alive. The author did not set out to compile a comprehensive study, but rather to give a well-founded guide to the era.
The author takes a contrarian view of the emperor Diogenes, depicting him in the absolute opposite terms to how he has been described throughout history. The author blames this misrepresentation on the Doukai, the family that replaced Diogenes as emperor, and sullied his name. The author writes of a seasoned army general, who came to power and began to re-organise and re-vamp the Roman Army (we call them Byzantines – they called themselves Romans), which due to internal conflict amongst the aristocracy, had become a pale shadow of its former self.
Through the author’s eyes, we see how close Diogenes came to writing a new history of Anatolia, and potentially of the West. We also see the reasons behind his downfall.
The author also deals with the various waves of nomads and mercenaries that swept through this troubled area, and the powerful personalities that drove the Crusaders to the gates of Jerusalem. Again, he succinctly gives an overview of the political currents and pressures, and the short-sightedness of supposed leaders.
What I Liked:
The author being unequivocal in his defence of the maligned Diogenes.
The engaging writing style
The coherence the author brought to the timeline, while making t an engaging read.
What I Didn’t Like:
Nothing – I really enjoyed it.
Overall:
A very good read, and an excellent primer for those who want to delve further into this time. It will entertain and inform, with some great insights into human behaviour. Absolutely recommended.
Acknowledgements:
Thanks to Matador, Troubador Publishing and NetGalley, who gave me a free copy of the book in return for an honest and objective review.
An interesting and thought-provoking overview of that most enigmatic of empires, Byzantium. It deals specifically with the hundred years or so before and including the First Crusade, and makes a compelling argument to treat the desperate defence of Byzantium, and the prosecution of the Crusade as the real first world war.
Main Characters:
Romanus Diogenes: 1068-71: A warrior Emperor, who fought the battle of Manzikert, but was betrayed.
Michael Doukas: Emperor who followed Diogenes. The most apt comparison would be chalk & cheese.
Alp Arslan: Seljuk Sultan who opposed Diogenes at Manzikert.
Basil II: 976-1025: Emperor before Diogenes.
Minor Characters:
Pope Urban II: He called for the First Crusade, 1095.
Tughril: Great Sultan, 1038-1063.
Plot:
Byzantium, with its capital Constantinople, has always fascinated me. It has an intensely complex history, and some of the greatest characters to have lived.
In this novel, the author tells of the events leading up to the First Crusade, in the eleventh century. He breaks the book into two sections, the first dealing with the decline of the Empire in the hundred years or so from Basil II, then to the role that Byzantium played in the build-up to the First Crusade.
The book is concise, and gives a clear timeline, with enough information on the characters and events as they play out to make the events come alive. The author did not set out to compile a comprehensive study, but rather to give a well-founded guide to the era.
The author takes a contrarian view of the emperor Diogenes, depicting him in the absolute opposite terms to how he has been described throughout history. The author blames this misrepresentation on the Doukai, the family that replaced Diogenes as emperor, and sullied his name. The author writes of a seasoned army general, who came to power and began to re-organise and re-vamp the Roman Army (we call them Byzantines – they called themselves Romans), which due to internal conflict amongst the aristocracy, had become a pale shadow of its former self.
Through the author’s eyes, we see how close Diogenes came to writing a new history of Anatolia, and potentially of the West. We also see the reasons behind his downfall.
The author also deals with the various waves of nomads and mercenaries that swept through this troubled area, and the powerful personalities that drove the Crusaders to the gates of Jerusalem. Again, he succinctly gives an overview of the political currents and pressures, and the short-sightedness of supposed leaders.
What I Liked:
The author being unequivocal in his defence of the maligned Diogenes.
The engaging writing style
The coherence the author brought to the timeline, while making t an engaging read.
What I Didn’t Like:
Nothing – I really enjoyed it.
Overall:
A very good read, and an excellent primer for those who want to delve further into this time. It will entertain and inform, with some great insights into human behaviour. Absolutely recommended.
Acknowledgements:
Thanks to Matador, Troubador Publishing and NetGalley, who gave me a free copy of the book in return for an honest and objective review.
September 2, 2020
A fine history of a pivotal period in Byzantine history. The author's discussion of the events leading up to the Battle of Manzikert is remarkably thorough. The description of it comes from sources both Byzantine and Turkish/Arab, so we get a clear image of what actually happened, rather than just the politically motivated trash talk of Michael Psellos.
There were a few oversights on the author's part. For example, he says at one point that Romanus IV Diogenes did not have any daughters when, in fact, he did have a daughter who was married to Manuel Comnenus. He also stated that Romanus may have been concerned about Manuel's loyalty at one point, when not only was Manuel married to his daughter, but Manuel's whole family was known to be quite loyal to Romanus.
The author also makes the claim that Basil II reduced the military's presence in Anatolia during his reign (ending in 1025) due to the fact that a number of rebels came from that area. That was the first time I've read that claim.
One thing I haven't seen any historian discuss was the relevance of Romanus's 2nd wife, the Empress Eudokia Makrembolitissa, having two sons "born in the purple" during Romanus's reign. Those boys would definitely have been competition for the throne with Eudokia's sons by her first marriage to Constantine Ducas. I believe that those boys may have been the inciting factor in Caesar John Ducas's efforts to get rid of Romanus. The boys were a threat to Constantine X Ducas's legacy that daughters would never have been.
The writing in this history was excellent - a lively retelling of the history of the period that will keep the reader enthralled. A generous collection of maps are included. Overall, a fine addition to anyone's Byzantine history collection.
There were a few oversights on the author's part. For example, he says at one point that Romanus IV Diogenes did not have any daughters when, in fact, he did have a daughter who was married to Manuel Comnenus. He also stated that Romanus may have been concerned about Manuel's loyalty at one point, when not only was Manuel married to his daughter, but Manuel's whole family was known to be quite loyal to Romanus.
The author also makes the claim that Basil II reduced the military's presence in Anatolia during his reign (ending in 1025) due to the fact that a number of rebels came from that area. That was the first time I've read that claim.
One thing I haven't seen any historian discuss was the relevance of Romanus's 2nd wife, the Empress Eudokia Makrembolitissa, having two sons "born in the purple" during Romanus's reign. Those boys would definitely have been competition for the throne with Eudokia's sons by her first marriage to Constantine Ducas. I believe that those boys may have been the inciting factor in Caesar John Ducas's efforts to get rid of Romanus. The boys were a threat to Constantine X Ducas's legacy that daughters would never have been.
The writing in this history was excellent - a lively retelling of the history of the period that will keep the reader enthralled. A generous collection of maps are included. Overall, a fine addition to anyone's Byzantine history collection.
August 4, 2020
( Format : Audiobook )
"History has not been kind to the memory of Romanus."
This excellent read about the events leading to the Crusades in part helps to reprise Romanus' time, starting with his trial for treason, in which he admitted the intention and, rather than be executed, the 'best general in the army' was exiled by the senators, before being asked by the recently widowed Empress Eudocia to be Commander in Chief of the army, then her husband and Emperor.
Meticulous research from multiple sources provides a balanced approach to all of the characters involved, from Romanus himself, the Doukai family and all who confronted the Empire. The author's narrative style provides a clear, fascinating and even exciting tale of these final years of the Roman Empire: history as it should be written, enjoyable and approachable even for someone with no knowledge of the era and sufficiently inspirational to make the reader want to find out more.
Narration by Martin Carroll is clear, well modulated and easy on the ear. He does not get in the way of the text but rather, stands back to allow what is written gently come to life. A fine performance. This is a book for anyone with an interest in history, in the late Roman Empire or the Crusades themselves. I was very fortunate in being freely gifted with a complimentary copy of The Byzantine World War, by the rights holder, at my request, via Audiobook Boom Thank you so much. This was a period about which I had known almost nothing, despite my fondness for ancient Rome, fascinating, and I am left wanting to learn more, in addition to enhancing my understanding about the conception of the Crusades. A good read, recommended.
"History has not been kind to the memory of Romanus."
This excellent read about the events leading to the Crusades in part helps to reprise Romanus' time, starting with his trial for treason, in which he admitted the intention and, rather than be executed, the 'best general in the army' was exiled by the senators, before being asked by the recently widowed Empress Eudocia to be Commander in Chief of the army, then her husband and Emperor.
Meticulous research from multiple sources provides a balanced approach to all of the characters involved, from Romanus himself, the Doukai family and all who confronted the Empire. The author's narrative style provides a clear, fascinating and even exciting tale of these final years of the Roman Empire: history as it should be written, enjoyable and approachable even for someone with no knowledge of the era and sufficiently inspirational to make the reader want to find out more.
Narration by Martin Carroll is clear, well modulated and easy on the ear. He does not get in the way of the text but rather, stands back to allow what is written gently come to life. A fine performance. This is a book for anyone with an interest in history, in the late Roman Empire or the Crusades themselves. I was very fortunate in being freely gifted with a complimentary copy of The Byzantine World War, by the rights holder, at my request, via Audiobook Boom Thank you so much. This was a period about which I had known almost nothing, despite my fondness for ancient Rome, fascinating, and I am left wanting to learn more, in addition to enhancing my understanding about the conception of the Crusades. A good read, recommended.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 59 reviews