A friend recommended this book to me about 5 years ago and I’ve only just got around to downloading it onto my Kindle. I wish I had read a sample of it before buying. I studied some psychology as part of my degrees, and wrote a Masters dissertation around wellbeing and happiness; so have already read much of the research and the theories which underpin this book. I suggest choosing some of the terms and authors mentioned here and looking up their work, or at least Googling for a precis of their main points. It will be far less irritating and much more informative, without the constant ‘Aren’t we great, so knowledgeable, so funny.’
It’s awful. I just couldn’t finish it.
A few examples of a little of what I found grated, or was annoying or offensive:
‘The UK government has recently initiated a national happiness survey, much to the chagrin of the popular press. ‘Waste of Money’ screamed the Express. ‘Happy Clappy Nonsense’, suggested a Mail columnist. (The irony that a happiness survey has created so much anger seems to have been lost on everyone but me.)’
Arrogant much? Really no one else in a country of 60 million?
A few tabloid newspapers is not ‘so much anger’, it’s a journalistic technique to scream a headline to increase buyers of their rag.
‘Anecdotally, we all know a few really happy and upbeat people (although if you think about it, it’s actually very few). But because they’re not a drain on society – hardly ever ill, don’t go to the docs, just kind of get on with life in a positive, energetic way – we’ve never really bothered about them.’
So OFFENSIVE!
They are stating that people whom are unwell, or have mental health issues, or disabilities or are experiencing a vicious menopause etc etc… are a drain on society?! And they are never ever happy or upbeat? So to be positive and happy you need to never be ill, or ask for help? The language used in parts of this book is insensitive at best, offensive at worst.
The statement that there are very few really happy and upbeat people makes me certain that if is not the norm, then this is for a reason. Human beings are complex and life is challenging. Anyway, who wants to be up all the time? A positive mental attitude, yes. Not running people down or continually moaning, yes, but I believe being honest and *authentic* is really valuable for building strong relationships, through showing vulnerability and being brave enough to ask for help. It’s far healthier than putting on a happy face to mask how you really feel all the time. I’ve known one person who seemed upbeat and positive all the time and wow she was annoying to be around for any length of time! I never believed it was how she really felt all the time. How could it be? We never really got to know the real her at all. It felt like an act, or a mask. I admittedly might be wrong, but I trust my gut.
‘We have sought out research into positive people as well as the positive people themselves. It’s been written up in my thesis, all 80,000 words of it. And, because it’s a doctorate, I’ve had to try and make them big, complicated words! But if you lose the academic clap-trap, you’re left with some clear, simple and do-able principles.’
Ah… ‘the academic clap-trap’ this whole book is based upon? The research that you regurgitate, without which you would not have a book or any workshops to lead?
‘Andy Whittaker is an NLP Trainer as well as being a bit OCD on self-development.’
When was this book published?! Really this outdated and offensive OCD term in this context needs to be removed.
And if you really want a cringe-fest read the ‘About the authors’ section. Awful.