Exemplary...and Unconventional
This is Louise Welsh's first novel, and the second of hers that I've read (having read the first two in reverse order).
It's an exemplary crime novel, although the fact that it complies with many or most of the conventions of the crime genre is almost incidental to its design and appeal.
It's very capable literary fiction that happens to be set in the context of a criminal enterprise that is brought or almost brought undone by the narrator.
Authorial Gender
There are at least two stylistic features that fascinated me about the execution of the novel.
First, Welsh uses a first person male narrator, Rilke. I felt that the style shared a lot with that of Benjamin Black (the pseudonym of John Banville, whose first crime novel was published four years later). Welsh is very observant of environment, appearance and sensitivity. You see with Rilke's eyes, and once you get used to them, you start to think like he thinks. It helps that he's an auctioneer, not a policeman or a detective or a private eye. He's not inept, but he's not experienced either. He's not used to finding himself in these situations, nor are we, unless we've become vicarious detectives via reading.
The attention to detail helps us forget that the author is female, at least until it comes to the narrator's sex life. Many readers question whether a male can successfully write a female character, or at least a female narrator. I'm pretty sure that, if you didn't know that Welsh was female, you'd be convinced the author was a man. This is a tribute to the quality of her writing, regardless of her gender.
Genre Gender
The second feature that fascinated me was the fact that Rilke is single, white, 43 years old and gay.
This last characteristic allows Welsh to further circumvent the conventions of the crime genre. However, she does it without detracting from the intrinsic appeal of the genre itself. As a result, her success asks the question, why can't there be more gay narrators and protagonists in the crime genre?
Of course, if Welsh was a heterosexual female, you could argue that some of her description of what Rilke does to other men might coincide with her own experience. Thus, you could say that she is able to use her normal descriptive powers, but adjust only the gender of the narrator. However, without venturing into her sexual past, she is openly and proudly gay, so again you have to admire her skill in portraying all aspects of genre and sexuality. I wonder how many heterosexual male authors could match her ability.
The Narrative Puzzle
If I may add a third feature to my list, I'll praise her ability to tell a story. Much of the fiction I read deliberately tampers with or rebels against the conventions of narrative. To the extent that Post-Modernist works contain a story at all, the reader must do their own work to reconstruct the story out of the fragments. I like doing this, in the same way I used to like doing jigsaw puzzles as a child. However, Welsh reminds you of what a pleasure it is to witness a story (like a joke) being told in exactly the right order, with facts revealed not too early or too late, and tension remaining at the end of each chapter. It's also nice to get to the end of a mystery and know that there are no missing or extraneous pieces.
These three features made the novel not just an exemplary crime novel, but an exemplary novel per se. It's also an exemplary beach novel. It's 38 degrees centigrade and 90% humidity here at the moment. Time to get wet.