დიქტატორის ჩრდილქვეშ – პინოჩეტი

by Heraldo Muñoz, ზაზა ჭილაძე (Translator), გრიგოლ ჭუმბურიძე (Translator)

გენერალი აუგუსტო პინოჩეტი მსოფლიოში ერთ-ერთი ყველაზე ცნობილი სამხრეთამერიკელი პოლიტიკოსია. ყოფილი დიქტატორის სახელი კარგად ახსოვთ აზიასა და აფრიკაში, ორსავე ამერიკასა და ევროპაში. პინოჩეტი შეიძლება, თამამად მოვიხსენიოთ ფრანსისკო ფრანკოს, იოსებ სტალინის, ფერდინანდ მარკოსისა თუ ირანის შაჰის გვერდით. პინოჩეტი ბოლომდე არ შეესატყვისება სამხრეთამერიკელი დიქტატორების იმ კარიკატურას, რომელსაც ამერიკული ფილმები გვიხატავენ ანდა გაბრიელ გარსია მარკესი გვთავაზობს თავის სახელგანთქმულ ნაწარმოებში „პატრიარქის შემოდგომა“. ცხადია, ის ვერც ბისმარკად ჩაითვლება. მართალია, უსაზღვრო ინტელექტით არ გამოირჩეოდა, მაგრამ ისტორიულ გზაჯვარედინზე აღმოჩენილმა ამ კაცმა მაინც წარმართა ცვლილებების ის პროცესი ჩილეში, რომელმაც მძლავრი საერთაშორისო გავლენა იქონია. 1973 წელს პინოჩეტის მიერ სოციალისტი პრეზიდენტის, სალვადორ ალიენდეს დამხობამ საბჭოთა კავშირის მაშინდელ მეთაურს, ლეონიდ ბრეჟნევს უბიძგა, მესამე სამყაროს ქვეყნებში შეიარაღებული ბრძოლის ტაქტიკისათვის მიემართა. პინოჩეტის სისხლიანი ამბოხისა და ამის შედეგად ჩილეში კომუნისტური პარტიის მდგომარეობის შერყევა იმდენად მნიშვნელოვანი აღმოჩნდა მოსკოვისათვის, რომ „კიდევ ერთი ჩილეს“ გამეორების შიშით, 1979 წელს საბჭოთა კავშირი ავღანეთში შეიჭრა იქ კომუნისტური რეჟიმის გასამყარებლად. და მაინც, პინოჩეტის პიროვნება და მისი მემკვიდრეობა მთლიანად ერთგვაროვან შეფასებას არ იმსახურებს: მარგარეტ ტეტჩერს პინოჩეტი კომუნიზმის შემაკავებელ ჯებირად მიაჩნდა და აქტიურად მოითხოვდა მის გათავისუფლებას. ამ წიგნის მიზანია, გაარკვიოს, რა გავლენა მოახდინა პინოჩეტმა თანამედროვე ისტორიაზე, ახსნას ის არაერთი სიმბოლო თუ არაერთგვაროვანი მიდგომა, მისი პიროვნება რომ აჩენს. ეს არ არის მხოლოდ ბიოგრაფია, არამედ თან პინოჩეტის ხანისა და მისი მემკვიდრეობის ერთგვარ კვლევასაც გულისხმობს.

Genres: History, Politics, Nonfiction, Biography, Memoir, Latin American History, World History

336 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2008

Reviews

[HAMiD · Rating 4 out of 5]

با نگاهی به گذشته می توانیم ببینیم که تا اندازه ای ما آفریننده ی دیکتاتور بودیم. دو قطبی شدن جامعه ی شیلی، خواسته های ایده آل گرایانه و باورنکردنی چپ برای تحولی افراطی از دولت منتخبی که به وسیله ی حکومت ائتلافی برگزیده شده بود، ایدئولوژی سازی و نرمش ناپذیری یک مرکز سیاسی عملگرای سابق و واکنش مصالحه ناپذیر راست که مخالف تغییر بودند و از امتیازاتش دفاع می کردند، همگی به فروریختن دموکراسی شیلی و برآمدن پینوشه یاری کرد
پینوشه خلاصه ای از خطاهای یک نسل را ارائه کرد. بسیاری هنوز آسان تر می بینند که با مقصر دانستن او به تنهایی خودشان را از خطاهاشان برکنار بدانند. با مرگ او بخشی از همه ی ما، کسانی که در چهار دهه با شیلی پیوند داشتند هم مُردند. بخشی از تاریخ که ما را انسان هایی در زنجیر و خون می شناخت نیز مُرد


هفدهمِ اردی بهشتِ دو صفر چهاردهِ جهنم

[Maziyar Yf · Rating 3 out of 5]

از عنوان کتاب سایه دیکتاتور – زندگی تحت حکومت آگوستاو پینوشه چنین بر می اید که کتاب باید زندگی مردم عادی شیلی در زمان پینوشه و اثرات حکومت دیکتاتوری آن بر زندگی روزمره مردم باشد ، یا نظرات قربانیان پینوشه یا کسانی که در زندان بوده اند یا شکنجه شدگان را در مورد زندگی در آن دوران بازگو کند ، اما کتاب این گونه نیست ، آقای هرالدو مونیزکه سیاستمدار و دیپلمات و فعال حقوق بشر بوده در این کتاب به شرح مبارزات خود و شکل گیری جامعه مدنی شیلی در برابر دیکتاتور پرداخته و از بررسی تغییرات زندگی عامه مردم در دوران پینوشه خودداری کرده است .
آقای مونیز به زندگینامه پینوشه هم نپرداخته و مثلا مشخص نکرده است که چگونه افکار کودتا و همکاری با کودتاگران در ذهن پینوشه شکل گرفته بود ، همین طور نویسنده به حمایت آمریکا از کودتا و سقوط دولت سوسیالیستی سالوادر آلنده در کودتای مورد حمایت آمریکا هم اشاره ای گذارا کرده است ، گویی که این حمایت ارزش زیادی نداشته .
چیزی که در کتاب می خوانیم تلاش نویسنده برای مبارزه مدنی با دیکتاتور از طریق روشهای مدنی و مسالمت آمیز ، شکل دادن گروه های مخالف ، فرستادن نماینده به مجلس ، شکل دادن اپوزیسیون ، تلاش در جهت برگزاری همه پرسی برای کناره گیری پینوشه از قدرت ، آشکار کردن جنایات ودزدیهای او و تلاش برای محاکمه پینوشه و ...... بوده .
آقای مونیز سعی کرده که نگاهی بی طرف به پینوشه و دستاوردهای او داشته باشد اما تقریبا در همه جای کتاب با دیده نفرت و تحقیر به او نگریسته و از آنجایی که از لحاظ اعتقادات سیاسی کاملا در جبهه مخالف پینوشه بوده ، در کتاب خود نتوانسته اصول بی طرفی را رعایت کند .
اما کتاب سایه دیکتاتور برای مخاطبان خاورمیانه ای که سالیان سال با استبداد و دیکتاتوری زیسته اند می تواند جالب باشد ، در حقیقت دیکتاتوری که آقای مونیز به تصویر می کشد در برابر انواع دیکتاتورها و خودکامه گانی که در خاورمیانه دیده شده اند و پدیده ای که در کل به نام استبداد شرقی شناخته می شود مجسمه مهربانی و عطوفت بوده است .
در دوران پینوشه روزنامه های مخالف چاپ شده، اپوزیسیون شناخته شده وجود داشته و احزاب سیاسی هم فعالیت می کردند ، معمولا دیدار با سران مخالف از خواسته های معمولی رهبران خارجی مانند پاپ ژان پل دوم بوده که پینوشه با آن موافقت می کرده است . پینوشه به سادگی نظرات کارشناسان اقتصادی را می پذیرفت و در سایه همین تصمیمات نظام مستمری بسیار پیشرفته ای در شیلی وضع شد که جرج بوش پسر قصد کپی کردن آن و اجرایش در آمریکا را داشت . هنگامی که شکست او در رفراندوم مشخص شد تقریبا به سادگی آنرا پذیرفت و قدرت را بدون خونریزی تحویل دولت منتخب داد . آقای مونیز با اشاره ای به عملکرد اقتصادی پینوشه این گونه نتیجه گیری می کند که پینوشه نمی خواسته فقط به عنوان دیکتاتور به یاد آورده شود .

کتاب یک شخصیت بسیار دوست داشتنی و قابل احترام را هم معرفی کرده : خانم میشل باچله ، دختر ژنرال باچله . کسی که کودتای پینوشه را تایید نکرد ، توسط حکومت نظامی زندانی ودر زندان در گذشت . خانم باچله که در دوران پینوشه بارها زندانی و شکنجه شده بود به عنوان نخستین رئیس جمهور زن در شیلی دو بار انتخاب شد و هم اینک کمیسر عالی حقوق بشر سازمان ملل ، عالیترین مقام حقوق بشری در سرتاسر جهان شناخته می شود .

[KamRun · Rating 3 out of 5]

برای این کتاب رویو خواهم نوشت، اما تا اینجای کار:
قبلا کتاب سالوادور آلنده: دموکرات انقلابی رو خوندم، مستند چند قسمتی نبرد شیلی رو هم دیدم. شکستن طلسم وحشت رو هم باید بخونم (دارم می‌خونم) تا اولا بتونم در مورد این سه تا کتاب چیزی بنویسم و دوما، پرونده شیلی موقتا بسته بشه. ولی علی‌الحساب حین دیدن مستند نبرد شیلی و خوندن "شکستن طلسم وحشت" فهمیدم مونیز، نویسنده کتاب سایه دیکتاتور 1 - اون‌طوری که توی کتاب ادعا می‌کنه نیست و نسبت به اجرای عدالت و گرفتن انتقام از پینوشه کمی بی‌بخار تشریف داره 2- با توجه به اینکه مدت زیادی رو در آمریکا گذرونده، روحیات آمریکایی پیدا کرده و حین نگارش به سمت آمریکایی‌ها غش می‌کنه 3- نظر به گرایشات آمریکایی‌ش، بیشتر از چیزی که توی کتاب تعریف کرده با چپ‌ها مشکل داره
در کل بین مجموعه کتاب‌های سرخ نشر ثالث کتاب بی‌طرف پیدا نمی‌شه و کتب مذکور عموما کم و بیش متمایل به سرمایه‌داری و در راس اون، آمریکا هستند. در واقع شما با خوندن این مجموعه کتاب‌ها، اطلاعاتی منطبق با نظام اطلاعاتی حاکم بر دنیا بدست میارید، نه هیچ چیز متفاوتی. از این رو من هم شخصا هیچ میلی به فروختن این کتاب‌ها ندارم (باز خوبه مترجم کتاب بیژن اشتری نبود!)

[Brian · Rating 4 out of 5]

Heraldo Munoz, a former leader in the left movements of Chile, provides a look at the dictator Augusto Pinochet who ruled with an iron fist in Chile throughout the 1970's and early 80's. Munoz provides what he terms as a political memoir to look at the changes surrounding the regime from those who opposed it throughout the time of Pinochet. One point that has to be appreciated from this book is that while it captures the horrors of Pinochet's time it does not go through a categorical list of atrocities as most Pinochet books do. Munoz focuses instead on what was changing in Chile and how it fit into a wider global context vis a vis communism an d the west. While clearly gloating over the fall of Pinochet and outright mocking Pinochet's defense at trial this book gives one sides account of the story and it is a side that has not been told in this much detail from one on the ground yet. For those who are starting out in this subject I would not recommend this book as it assumes a decent knowledge of Chile and does not give a balanced look at the sides. For those who have read more this is an excellent addition to the literature on the topic and a wonderful primary source for those looking into the history of Chile.

[Oto Bakradze · Rating 3 out of 5]

სოციალისტური პოზიციიდან დაწერილი წიგნი რომ არ იყო, უფრო უკეთესი იქნებოსა, თუმცა მაინც საკმარისი მტკიცებულებებია პინოჩეტის რეჟიმსა და ჩილეს 70-90-იანი წლების პოლიტიკურ-სოციალურ ვითარებებზე.

თუ პინოჩეტის მიერ სამხედრო გადატრიალება უშუალოდ კისინჯერისა და ნიქსონის დონეზე წყდებოდა, იმის შიშით რომ ახალი კუბა არ გამეორებულიყო ჩილეშიც და შემდეგ მთლიან სამხრეთ ამერიკაში, ორი სიტყვა მაინც ეთქვა, ალიენდეს მთავრობა მითითებებს რომ პირდაპირ კგბ-დან იღებდა. გამოქვეყნდა ეგ დოკუმენტები საბჭოთა კავშირის დაშლის შემდეგ და არც მანამდე დაწერილი წიგნია ეს.

[Adrian Dorney · Rating 4 out of 5]

Augusto Pinochet Ugarte. An atypical dictator if there ever was one. This book, told through the coupling of a firsthand memoir with in depth analysis of Chilean politics past and present is the work of Chilean socialist and current Chilean politician, Heraldo Munoz. Munoz, who was an avowed supporter of Marxist-Socialist President Salvador Allende when he came to power in the early 1970s begins the book with a chapter profiling his personal experience in the nation of Chile on September 11th, 1973 when General Augusto Pinochet, along with other military commanders Gustavo Leigh, Jose Merino and Cesar Mendoza executed a Nixon-sponsored coup d'etad which installed Pinochet as the President-General of the Republic. Munoz carries on to detail the strident anti-communism of Pinochet and how it attracted the diplomatic sympathy of the infamous Henry Kissinger. This incredibly detailed book carries a litany of names and dates, hence why it is a deceptively long read.

I personally picked up this book because I was interested in learning more about the implementation of Milton Friedman's University of Chicago trained economists and how their privatization, currency deregulation and pension reform turned the country around. Munoz touches on economics lightly, showing that despite popular opinion, Pinochet was not a free-market ideologue but rather a pragmatist who was sympathetic to Chicago ideals but never went fully along with it. In fact, Pinochet implemented minimum wage hikes, currency devaluations and bank bailouts all to the dismay of the "Chicago Boys". Because Munoz specialises in Foreign Policy, much of the book details General Pinochet's tense relationship with the Carter and Reagan administrations as well as his experience working underground throughout the 1980s with various groups to attempt to foster a democratic movement in Chile, working closely alongside future presidents Ricardo Lagos and Patricio Aylwin. I found the chapter on Pinochet's 1998 arrest in London to be very a enlightened account of the arcane nature of international law, as well as doing an excellent job of highlighting a cross-section of opinions espoused by a plethora of sources during that very interesting time from Jack Straw to Margaret Thatcher to the Wall Street Journal to several western European Governments.

At the end of the book, I concluded that what Augusto Pinochet did to political dissidents in Chile for 17 years under his reign was simply grotesque and impermissible behavior for a government. BUT, it is however extremely important to realize that it is far more than likely that the neoliberal reforms implemented under Pinochet - regardless of what his ideological endgame was - quite literally saved Chile from becoming the Communist hellhole of a country observable in places like Venezuela, Cuba or for that matter, Somalia. It is also an important fact to observe that Pinochet did not govern without somewhat of a consensus. He held two plebiscites on the validity of his mandate, one in 1980 and one in 1988, his defeat in the latter is what causing him to relinquish his power in 1990. This book is good for any individual seeking to know almost everything there is to know about General Pinochet and his regime, as well as those seeking to enhance their perceptions of geopolitics and economics. Heraldo Munoz is a socialist, and thus downplays the ostensible tragedy that an Allende Chile could have yielded, he also unjustly demonizes Kissinger's need to keep Chile from the iron blade of Communism. It is an extremely well-researched book, and I would be giving it 4.5 if the option was available. The lack of objectivity and subtle sympathy to Communist terror groups earns a slightly less than 5 star read. After reading this book, I am left with a deep sense of despair that Chile may be dragged into the abyss by current President Michelle Bachelet (whose father was tortured and killed under General Pinochet's government) My mature self reminds me of the evil conducted under Pinochet. But my fancifal side bellows a faint rallying call for Captain General Pinochet as the liberator of the Chilean people.
4 Stars.

[Michael Andersen-Andrade · Rating 5 out of 5]

The Dictator's Shadow is a classic study on the makings of a right-wing dictator under the auspices of the American government. Never underestimate America's capacity to undermine democratically elected governments or to destroy social justice movements that threaten predatory capitalism.

"On November 6, 1970, only days after Allende's inauguration, Nixon presided over a National Security Council meeting on Chile in the White House cabinet room. Kissinger opened the meeting.

"All the agencies are agreed that Allende will try to create a socialist state," he said. A modus vivendi might be possible, but at the "risk that he will consolidate his position and then move ahead against us".

"If we have to be hostile, we want to do it right," Secretary of State William P. Rogers suggested. "We can put an economic squeeze on him."

"Our main concern in Chile is the prospect that Allende can consolidate himself, and the picture projected to the world will be his success," affirmed Nixon. "if we let...leaders in South America think they can move like Chile and have it both ways, we will be in trouble. Latin America is not gone, and we want to keep it, " he concluded.

[Troy · Rating 4 out of 5]

I loved the back and forth between the Pinochet's rise to power and the author's underground opposition work. There are even some interesting connections to the Denver area, as he attended DU, went to school with Condoleeza Rice and played on soccer teams in the area. He uncovered a lot of new information for me, such as the relatively passive personality and approach Pinochet took in his career leading up to the coup, getting involved only at the last minute after others convinced him. Its a reminder of how vigilant we all have to be to prevent someone like that coming to power and then becoming addicted to it, leading to torture, kidnapping and murder to sustain it. Also disturbing is his continued career in the government of Chile with two subsequent presidents, without any concern expressed from recent US presidents like Bush and Clinton. At a time when authoritarians are popping up all over the world, let'ts not forget that Pinochet was in power for over 15 years, all the way until 1989. And they fit right into this cycle going on, whether its Syria or Honduras.

http://jensorensen.com/2018/12/04/the...

[Julie Capell · Rating 4 out of 5]

The history of Chile, from 1973 through 2006, is fascinating and not well enough known by the majority of U.S. citizens. This memoir, written by someone with first-hand knowledge of the events, is a comprehensive and fascinating summation of this tumultuous period, during which the Chilean people suffered greatly. The dictator in the title is General Augusto Pinochet, and for a long time, he ruled by fear and benefited from a fractured political landscape. This book tells the story of how the various political factions and parties finally came together to beat Pinochet and create what is today one of the strongest economies and democratic governments in South America.

The tale of how this small country on the edge of South America, with a long and proud democratic tradition, came under the thrall of one of the most notorious dictators of the twentieth century, is not that different from the way many other dictators came to power: with the help of the CIA and other parts of the U.S. government, of course! During his rule, Pinochet ruthlessly repressed his enemies using exile, torture and execution, all in the name of fighting Communism.

Muñoz takes the reader through all seventeen years of the dictatorship. He describes in detail the infighting within the junta and how Pinochet managed to stay one step ahead of those who would challenge his power. He also describes, from his insider knowledge, how the various political parties spent years underground, some in armed resistance, others attempting to resist in more peaceful ways. Muñoz had a ringside seat as the various opposition players jockeyed for position, finally coming together to participate in the plebiscite election that was the beginning of Pinochet’s end.

The book also has an in-depth examination of how the “Chicago Boys” became Pinochet’s economic advisors and the numerous reforms they attempted in their efforts to reduce unemployment and return prosperity to the country. This whole section of the book is fascinating and was written so that someone like me (not an economist) could easily understand. Unlike many others, Muñoz refuses to give Pinochet and the Chicago Boys much credit for the economic success Chile now enjoys, pointing out that true prosperity did not return until democracy did, once Pinochet lost an “unlosable” plebiscite and a democratically elected president took over in 1990.

But the story doesn’t stop there—what happens after Pinochet leaves power is every bit as fascinating. The worldwide human rights movement used Pinochet as a test case. Indictments from a Spanish judge kept the former general under house arrest in London for nearly two years in the mid-1990’s. Tax evasion and money-laundering accusations continued to haunt Pinochet right up until his death in 2006.

I lived in Chile during the Pinochet dictatorship, in 1984-86, and experienced some of the events described in the book. I have been back to Chile many times since the fall of Pinochet, and greatly admire the Chilean people for the way that they reclaimed their democracy from the demagogues and fearmongers. On my last trip, in 2012, I went to visit Villa Grimaldi, a detention camp where political prisoners were tortured and killed by Pinochet’s secret police. It is now a peace park where former detainees tell their stories so that no one will forget what happened there. I also visited the new Museum of Human Rights in Santiago, a very informative and moving monument to all who fought the dictatorship and all who lost their lives in that struggle.

Anyone interested in the Cold War and international human rights would find this book an welcome addition to their bookshelves. I highly recommend it, along with the Pinochet Files, a book about more or less the same period in history, but explaining the U.S. role in Pinochet’s rise.

[Bap · Rating 4 out of 5]

The NYTimes comments about this memoir that the author went to State Univ of NY at Oswego thinking it was a suburb of NYC. It si only a five hour drive. He returns to Chile and as Pinochet launches his coup he has unstable sticks of dynamite strapped to his chest lookimg for a target. Fast forward, he is now Chile's permanent representative to the UN.

Pinochet was not only a ruthless dictator but he was also a pragmatist and a survivor. He lived into his 90's (think Franco) and presided over the transition back to democracy. Despite being indicted for crimes against humanity by a spanish prosecutor and held in London and later charged in Chile, he never was convicted.

Pinochet was also the darling of the right for his embrace of Milton Friedman's monetarism and his "Chicago boys". He was aided and abeted by Nixon and Kissinger and fast friends with Thatcher but blundered by ordering the assasination of Letlier on Massachusetts Ave.

The author persevered and saw the socialists return to power.

[sarah beisell · Rating 5 out of 5]

A sad chapter in history, but not without some reward

Great read. Smooth prose. Both an historical look at the regime and a personal journey under one of the most notorious dictators of recent years. There are some very honest admissions throughout that I must assume took some deep soul searching to come to terms with and be able to put on paper. One of the things I find amazing and beautiful is the lack of venomous hatred that one might expect. We see the maturity and acceptance of fate as time goes on. Not that he accepts what Pinochet had done as right or apologizes for his own beliefs, but he looks to the future and rejoices in the return to democracy.

This book is a good companion to other historical works on the subject precisely because it offers a personal view rather than a strictly historical and academic view. Both the personal and historical perspectives are, in my opinion, essential for a rounded and balanced understanding of this period not only in Chile's history but the Cold War context, and understanding the United States' policy of supporting right-wing dictators in the hemisphere and around the world. The three main reasons for the support of dictators were anti-Communism, protection of US investments and the desire for stability. For the US, if you, as a dictator, could fulfill these requirements then the US government would look the other way when it came to human rights abuses, corruption or repressive behavior...with the notable exception of Jimmy Carter.

All in all a very good read. A sad chapter in Chile's history and the world. Yet there is also joy in the return to democracy even while the Chilean people are grappling with the dictator's shadow. My respect goes out to the author, the survivors and the victims. It was a hard and unnecessary road, but they have shown their resilience and dedication to move forward.

[Marco Aurélio · Rating 5 out of 5]

Livro excelente. Escrito pelo diplomata Heraldo Muñoz Valenzuela, retrata desde o infame golpe até o fim dos dias do ditador sanguinário.
Há que defenda que o progresso do Chile nas mãos dos Chicago Boys, que realmente foi impressionante, justifica a passagem desse tirano. Mas os números da economia foram muito melhores depois que esse ser desprezível deixou o poder. O Chile brilhou mais ainda sob plena democracia.
Uma das ditaduras mais cruéis e violentas da América Latina foi um dos "remédios americanos" para evitar o comunismo. Essa praga que alguns teimam em pregar contra o tal comunismo. Até os EUA reconheceu seu erro. Mas uns teimosos revisionistas não.
Que essa era nojenta da história da América do Sul tenha ficado para trás.
Democracia é e sempre será imperfeita, mas de longe sempre será o melhor sistema, mesmo aguentando "Bolsonaros", "Dilmas", "Collors" e outros ...
Paciência...um dia a gente aprende, mas vamos continuar tentando pela via democrática.

[Allen Lee · Rating 4 out of 5]

I have heard the name "Pinochet" for a long time, but this man appeared in my mind with a shadowed face like a ghost. I knew nothing about his personality, anecdotes, policies, life and preference except the fact that he was a brutal general of Chile.

Herald's book not only help me know Pichochet in detail, it also maps the political history of Chile from 70s to 90s, including Allende's governance, Chilean predicament, economic reforms, constitutes, democratic transformation, etc.. Now I am confident to tell these things mentioned above. Such a book could be very boring and wordy, but Heraldo narrates this period from a personal perspective, being fraught with subjective affection and objective description, which makes this book readable and interesting.

Overall, this is a great introductory book to Chile's history and politics.

[Meg · Rating 3 out of 5]

A fascinating overview of how Pinochet gained and then maintained power in Chile. Once again, I need to comment that this extremely important period in world history was essentially unknown to me prior to reading this… US schools need to do better with world history and with recent history (and especially regarding regimes that WE directly caused, installed, and supported in the face of massive human rights violations). I appreciated Muñoz’ perspective, and the book was relatively easy to read, a combination of history and personal story. I also appreciate the extensive bibliography at the end for those who are interested in further study.

[Roo Marshall · Rating 2 out of 5]

Pretty turgid book. Having recently visited Chile and understood the “shadow” that Pinochet still casts over the older generations of the country, I wanted to read and learn more about his time. In parts the book is interesting when it focuses on the bigger picture and the coup, but in other parts in descends into the minutiae of the socialist party factionalism and the writer’s role in that. So if you want to understand what life was like for the average Chilean under Pinochet’s evil regime this is not the book for you. The title is rather a misnomer, it should be what life was like for the author not the people.

[Amy · Rating 2 out of 5]

I gave up on this book on page 85–about 1/4 of the way through the book. I found this book very difficult to follow. It wasn’t sequential. It didn’t focus on a particular theme. There were too many characters, and their relevancy to the main story wasn’t clear. There was too much written about opinions by those outside of the regime.

[Davit Tsaadze · Rating 3 out of 5]

ბევრად საინტერესო ადამიანი მეგონა პინოჩეტი.

[Meg - A Bookish Affair · Rating 4 out of 5]

"The Dictator's Shadow" is a nonfiction book about life under Agosto Pinochet in Chile. It talks about how Pinochet came to power and how he was able to consolidate his power for so long. Pinochet's regime is still a regime that is studied a lot in political science. Pinochet is a hero to some and a villain to others. His rise to power is very interesting, especially for me, a person who spent a lot of time in undergrad studying Latin American history.

Perhaps one of the most interesting things about this book is the author. Heraldo Munoz served under Salvador Allende, whose government Pinochet ousted and currently serves under Michelle Bachelet. He has seen his country through many different time periods and has often been on the front lines of great change. Because of who he has worked under, there is a bit of a political bend here, which is why it may be best to have a fair understanding of Chile's political history prior to reading this book.

Munoz gives a lot of detail about what Pinochet's government was like and how people lived their lives under it. It is a very interesting history because it is not just a regurgitation of the facts. He gives a lot of context about what was actually happening to the people of Chile from everything just repeating a list of what Pinochet did. This book will appeal most to those who have an interest in Latin America at 10 history and have a basic understanding of some of its recent history.

[Kelsey · Rating 4 out of 5]

It's a fairly dense book and not exactly something fun to read when I have reading for classes to do so it took me about 9 months to read it. That said, I don't know if I could have gotten a more clear picture of the Pinochet regime from any other source. For a fairly academic book, Munoz provided a lot of personal anecdotes that gave a clear picture of who Pinochet was. Munoz' own political views were apparent, so his take on some issues was certainly sided, but the purpose of the book was not to attack the other side which I appreciated. I was surprised at the action sequences the book contained that are far more exciting than any action movie out today because they were real. I'd recommend it to anyone who wants to understand Chile's political atmosphere in the last third of the 20th century.

[Angela · Rating 3 out of 5]

Wow, this book just reminds me how little I know of the world, politics, and history. I choose to read this because Jonathan served his mission in Chile and had mentioned Pinochet before. I don't remember even knowing the name before that. So interesting, but very difficult for me to read. Difficult because of all the political stuff, millions of names of people I had never heard of, and just more intense than the normal read for me, thus it took me forever to get through it.

[Cal · Rating 4 out of 5]

Very interesting account of being on the "wrong" side ideologically. The writer stays fairly objective given his political allegiances ; recognizes some of the economic changes made under the regime were positive but at a very heavy price of human suffering and democracy. Good recent history.

[Gregory · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is a great book--I would highly recommend it for anyone interested in Pinochet and Chilean politics. It is very accessible for non-specialists, and offers a really interesting insider's view (Muñoz has held numerous high positions and is currently Chile's Ambassador to the UN).

[Jenny · Rating 4 out of 5]

A well-written and informative account by Munoz (the current Chilean ambassador to the UN). Even though I've followed the Pinochet case obsessively for ten years, I still learned new information in this book.

[Fredrick Danysh · Rating 3 out of 5]

Chile has had numerous coups and dictators. The Dictator's Shadow looks at Pinochet's rise to power and his reign in Chile. The author also discusses his personal involvement in the socialist movement.

[Ruth · Rating 5 out of 5]

A very detailed and heartbreaking account of Chile under Pinochet. And how even after his death, the legacy he left changed the lives of so many.