What do you think?
Rate this book


Nana's story, and that whole heroic, gory, frustrating, intrigue-filled chapter of history, are reported here for the first time from the Indian point of view, by a master story-teller. Though told as fiction, none of it is contrary to known fact.
As in THE PRINCES, Malgonkar's earlier novel, scenes of exotic pageantry and of violent action accompany a moving personal love story. Nana's relations with his British friends and enemies, his pleasures and palaces, his position as heir to the leadership of the once-powerful Maratha Confederacy, the ancient Hindu traditions that hedged him about, and the inner struggles of this complicated man, all contribute to a novel that is surprisingly relevant today.
310 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1972
Historical fiction set in India has only recently become commonplace so when I went looking for a classic in the genre, I found it. The lowered rating is only because the book was not entirely what I was looking for.
The loose and largely untrodden plot concerns Dhondu Pant Nana Saheb's life before, during, and after the 1857 First War of Independence (to the Indians, that is; The Sepoy Mutiny to the British). As the last Peshwa of the Maratha Confederacy, he was heir to a majestic empire that held off European (British, Dutch, Portuguese) advance in India for over 150 years only to be brought down in the familiar fashion by a society far more materially advanced and politically united. By the end of his life, he was a hate and reviled man by the British as they considered him the mastermind of the revolt against them.
Malgonkar does not tell this story as a historian, but from the first-person view of Nana Saheb himself. Indians did not develop a culture of personal letter writing or journaling as compared to Western culture so we are generally lacking in intimate understanding of people as compared to Washington or Napoleon.
This book attempts to fill in the gap by eschewing dry dates and military movements of most books on Indian history and fills in the reluctant heir and existential character of Nana Saheb during those important times. The book has little in the way of plot and much in the way of character development of which I had hoped there were would be better balance. Much of the novel concerns itself with the inner despondency of Nana who was by 1857, then a nominal king more concerned with fancy feasts and courtesans, thrust the reins as leader of the fight against the British.