While not a JET participant myself, I am fortunately acquainted with some current and former JETs, which makes perusing this research into the inception of the JET program both captivatingly intellectual and deeply personal. And David McConnell answers that expectation by delivering an exceptional opening and an impeccable epilogue, plus carefully articulated chapters that humor an outsider such as myself about the reality of "Importing Diversity" in Japan.
The book asks some very important questions: What kind of rationale went into the formulation of one of the biggest exchange program to date? How did such diverse expectations, between the (mostly Western) ALTs and the Japanese hosts, and among the various Japanese actors themselves, about the overall purpose of the program play out into conflicts at both national and local levels? In such process, how did individual players (except for the Japanese students themselves, oops), whose life are permanently altered by the emergence of JET program as the premier exchange and teaching (English) in Japan, react to such expectations and re-conceptualize their roles in this giant undertaking? As no two JET experience is the same, what has this massive top-down initiative achieved and not achieved during the first ten years, and to a certain extent, what does such (non-)success imply about the future of diversity as well as identity politics in Japan (and elsewhere)?
In the end, there is no correct answer to what "accommodation without assimilation" means , and there is no question that "diversity" has to be experienced firsthand. That a very abstract concept of "internationalization" can be turned into a reality which is the current JET program, with people tasked to define it in concrete policies and re-define it in the constant struggle for change, is already remarkable. As efforts towards "internationalization" and improvement of Japan's self-image are likely to intensify in the rush towards Tokyo Olympics 2020 (my company included), the important lessons about the clash of values during the early days of the JET program shall serve as a stark reminder that we all need to become understanding, respectful and above all, tolerant of the differences of the other sides, whether it is the group-mentality or the multicultural individualism.
What I like the most about this book, is the uncovering of the should-have-expected. Of course there are homosexual JETs. Of course there are suicide and drug and sexual harassment problems in the program (though more discussion on the bafflement of the host and the resulting policy cushion than the tacklement of the issues themselves). Of course there is teacher union, and of course there is a quasi-union of JETs (after all, JET is uh, a job). I would love to hear my JET friends elaborate more on what has (not) changed since the first ten years.