[Coventry, Francis] Day, Robert Adams. The History of Pompey the Or, The Life and Adventures of a Lap-Dog. Edited with an Introduction by Robert Adams Day. London, Oxford University Press, 1974 13,5 cm x 21 cm. Frontispiece, XLV, 221 pages Original Hardcover with illustrated dustjacket in protective Mylar. Excellent condition with only minor signs of wear. Francis Coventry's The History of Pompey the Little was the talk of London in 1751; it continued to captivate readers throughout the century. Satirizing notable persons and events of its day and thought at first because of its style to be by Fielding, it startled the public by having as its 'hero' a Bologna lapdog, and created a new and popular form in English fiction - the 'spy'-novel with a non-human observer. Passing through the hands of great ladies, peers, and beggars, a Cambdrige don, and the great evangelist Whitefield, Pompey took a dog's-eye view of the frailties of all English society. His creator was lauded for his
Deeply satirical and witty, this is a novella for those who already have a good amount of knowledge of the 18th century. The edition I have included lots of helpful footnotes, explaining bits of language or references that would have been more accessible back when it was published. It's very conscious about its status as satire, and uses literary tropes to maximise its impact. One thing I loved in particular is the use of the phrase Booby Squire. It means uncouth gentleman, but I can see myself using it on a day to day basis!
Irritating use of capital Letters for all Nouns as popular at the Time. Not so much the Black Beauty story I anticipated as a description of characters encountered throughout the dog's life. Good detail of period lifestyles, but arduous reading.
I didn't hate this. (Right, that's a strong way to start off a review.) It's slow going, to be honest, and I'm not the best with eighteenth-century literature, but as a historical document it's fascinating. Coventry's book was the first to really focus on an animal and elevate him to the status of hero. Along the way, there are some philosophical things (do animals have souls? will they go to heaven?) as well as discussions of animals as property. I didn't care for many of the human characters, but then again, it's the eighteenth century.
I should've seen the ending coming, because it ends as many stories about dogs do, but I felt unexpectedly sad. I was rather attached to little Pompey at the end, which surprised me.
Not something I'd recommend on a plot basis, but definitely something to consider if you're interested in historical depictions of animals, or if you are really into the eighteenth century. (GIVE ME MY VICTORIANS.)
This was the first "it" narrative I had ever read. It's, theoretically, from the point of view of a spaniel (dog) who moves about England being exchanged from owner to owner. His voice is lacking, however, and readers are left with social commentary and satire on the part of Coventry as well as lengthy ramblings seemingly from his point of view about English society and novels in general.
I felt unsatisfied after reading this, though there were particular "episodes" that were much like farces and absolutely hilarious. Pompey likes to pee on random things (like a philosophy book) and he is instrumental in tricking a college student into thinking that he has a bastard son when out pops Pompey. I appreciated those scenes.
In effect, I found Pompey to be nothing more than a narrative tool employed by Coventry to survey the English social scene of the 18th century (of all classes).
It's hard for me to take the satire seriously in this novel, since I glorify and anthropomorthize dogs so much routinely. There are parallels to be drawn between this and slave narratives such as Oroonoko that are narrated by a third person. Pompey is the character who ties the tale together but the narrative is seldom narrated from his perspective--rather, he unites a series of character portraits, all of which tend to reveal the contingent position of dogs in eighteen century society and dramatize the life of diffent class positions throughout that society.
Pompey the Little was the first it-narrative I've ever read. I enjoyed and appreciated it to an extent. While I thought the story was going to be about a dog, it was more about the owners he had (really how many owners can one dog have... it's sad). If you decide to read Pompey you really see how humans take animals as objects and property. Disheartening, Pompey never really finds a home... but then again it was never about Pompey. He's only a tool used by Coventry to get a different perspective about humans out into the world.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
‘Pompey the Little’ is obviously a first novel and doesn’t reach the heights of a ‘Tom Jones’ or a ‘Tristram Shandy’ but there is much good about it. I think the success of the book lies in a statement made right at the beginning in the dedication to Henry Fielding. ‘The characters of a novel principally determine its merit’. I believe this is the case today and was the case then, and on those merits ‘Pompey the Little’ succeeds admirably.
A comment on social illness in the 18th century and the supposed cure created by coffee houses, all while following the more so unfortunate adventures of a lap dog...