History After the Three Worlds: Post-Eurocentric Historiographies

by Arif Dirlik (Editor)

History as a discipline faces a crisis of identity as Eurocentrism fades in a world where globalized visions compete to explain historical processes. Facing the challenge squarely, this volume_comprising specialists on Asia, Africa, and Latin America_explores the state of historical analysis in various world regions and appraises current views on what defines and challenges historical knowledge. It is widely accepted that Eurocentrism no longer seem acceptable in a world where others are reasserting their own notions of past and future. The postDWorld War II spatialities that guided both historical analysis and the division of labor in historical work are in the process of disappearing into more globalized visions. Constituencies left out of history in the past are making demands for the recognition of their historical presence. History as epistemology is under attack as a marker of Eurocentric modernity from non-historical ways of thinking, as well as from ideologies of postmodernism that deny to history its claims to truth. Indeed, the current situation in the field has been described by one distinguished historian as a Ocacophonous confusion.O The challenge historians face is how to imagine new ways of writing history that overcome this confusion without falling back upon ideological and methodological prejudices that reproduce the problems of the past in new guises. The contributors discuss how these challenges are voiced and met in their different areas of specialization. Unsurprising in a volume that addresses a variety of regions and issues that are not only technically historiographical but also deeply cultural and political, the authors differ in their appraisal of the challenges presented by globalization, postmodernism, or postcolonialism. Yet they are united in their recognition of the validity of historical ways of knowing and their reaffirmation of the importance of history in grasping contemporary cultural and political problems. It is because history is entangled in a Eurocentric modernity that in a postmodern world it provides the medium for articulating alternatives to Eurocentrism_and to history itself.

288 pages, Paperback

First published November 22, 2000

About the author

(d: 1940, Mersin), 20. yüzyıl Çin toplumsal ve politik tarihi üzerine çalışmalarıyla tanınmasına karşın küreselleşme ve modernite konularında dünyanın önde gelen düşünürlerindendir. 1964 yılında Robert Kolej (bugünkü Boğaziçi Üniversitesi) Elektrik Mühendisliği Bölümü’nü bitirdi. Nükleer fizik eğitimi için gittiği Rochester Üniversitesi’nde Çin tarihçisi oldu. Özellikle “Çin anarşizmi” tarihçiliğinin önde gelen temsilcilerindendir. 2001 yılına kadar, otuz yıl Duke Üniversitesi’nde antropoloji ve tarih hocalığı yaptı. Sonra Oregon Üniversitesi’ne geçti, 2006’da emekli oldu. Halen, başta Pekin, Amsterdam ve Hong Kong olmak üzere, çeşitli akademik kurumlarda misafir öğretim üyesi olarak görev yapmaktadır. Gelecek üç yıl için, Malezya’da “yetkin araştırmacı” olarak bulunacaktır. Elliye yakın kitabı ve yüzlerce makalesi bulunan Profesör Dirlik’in Türkçe’ye dört kitabı ve dergilerde yayımlanmış on beş kadar makalesi çevrilmiştir. Askerlik yapmadığından Türkiye’ye giremiyor ve “ölüm makinelerine para ödemek istemediği için ‘bedelli’den” yararlanmıyor.