What do you think?
Rate this book
The Chalice and the Blade: Our History, Our Future
The legacy of the sacred feminine.
The Chalice and the Blade tells a new story of our cultural origins. It shows that warfare and the war of the sexes are neither divinely nor biologically ordained. It provides verification that a better future is possible—and is in fact firmly rooted in the haunting dramas of what happened in our past.
The Chalice and the Blade tells a new story of our cultural origins. It shows that warfare and the war of the sexes are neither divinely nor biologically ordained. It provides verification that a better future is possible—and is in fact firmly rooted in the haunting dramas of what happened in our past.
304 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1987
694 people are currently reading
11246 people want to read
About the author
Riane Eisler
30 books187 followersRiane Eisler is internationally known for her bestseller The Chalice and The Blade, now in 26 foreign editions and celebrating its 30th anniversary with a new 2017 epilogue in its 57th US printing, as well as for other award-winning books. She keynotes conferences worldwide, with venues including the United Nations General Assembly and the US Department of State. She is President of the Center for Partnership Studies and has received many honors, including honorary Ph.D. degrees, the Alice Paul ERA Education Award, and the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation's 2009 Distinguished Peace Leadership Award, and is featured in the award-winning book Great Peacemakers as one of 20 leaders for world peace, along with Mahatma Gandhi, Mother Teresa, and Martin Luther King.
She can be contacted at center@partnershipway.org.
Her websites are http://www.centerfor partnership.org, http://caringeconomy.org,
and http://www.rianeeisler.com
She can be contacted at center@partnershipway.org.
Her websites are http://www.centerfor partnership.org, http://caringeconomy.org,
and http://www.rianeeisler.com
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 440 reviews
April 3, 2009
Three stars because it was a pretty interesting read, and she covers, well, all of human history.
I read it because I know a number of people who claim this book fundamentally shaped their worldview (and a number of others who don't make that claim, but are certainly influenced by the popularity of Eisler's ideas).
The first half is in large part a summary and popularizing of the work of archaeologist Marija Gimbutas, who argues that before the spread of Indo-European civilization there existed a matrifocal [NOT matriarchal:], peaceful, egalitarian society, that practiced a predominately female-oriented polytheism that also involved a single Goddess figure.
Gimbutas is a highly controversial figure in archaeology, and I tried to wade a bit into the debate around her by reading a number of articles, to better weigh Eisler's argument.
My conclusion: there are a couple strong points to the idea of a more egalitarian Neolithic society that had possible elements of a religion involving numerous goddesses. Anything after that, we can't really say for sure. Gimbutas, and by extension Eisler, with all her claims after those, moves onto increasingly shakier ground.*
I feel like my comments on the second half of the book, in which Eisler moves away from prehistory to deal with the political power men have had over women throughout history, can be dealt with by pointing out that it's unfortunate that Judith Butler's Gender Trouble came out in 1990, three years after Eisler first wrote this.
Eisler sees the main theme throughout history as "the struggle between so-called feminine and masculine values" (138). That "so-called" is oddly placed, because it's clear that Eisler sees women as the bearers of the peaceful virtues; men are "regressive and violent" unless they submit to a feminine value system.
Which made me realize why I also have trouble believing her claims about a women-oriented peaceful society. I think that true egalitarianism is more likely to be achieved by making our concepts of sex and gender less rigid, more fluid, and more varied, rather than dividing humanity into two halves and constantly trying to either make both halves stay on the correct side, or to persuade one half that they're not good enough because they're not like the other.
*[This book also made me realize how skeptical I am about archaeological evidence in general, but especially about the interpretation of ancient art and symbols. And this I attribute, in large part, to a single exercise done for a class I took on Philosophy and Science Fiction: We had to write a story in which Carl Sagan's Pioneer plaque (see it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_...) was found by either humans or another species who didn't know its origin but had to try and interpret it anyhow... it's pretty clear how ridiculous it is to believe that someone would come up with the "right" meaning.]
I read it because I know a number of people who claim this book fundamentally shaped their worldview (and a number of others who don't make that claim, but are certainly influenced by the popularity of Eisler's ideas).
The first half is in large part a summary and popularizing of the work of archaeologist Marija Gimbutas, who argues that before the spread of Indo-European civilization there existed a matrifocal [NOT matriarchal:], peaceful, egalitarian society, that practiced a predominately female-oriented polytheism that also involved a single Goddess figure.
Gimbutas is a highly controversial figure in archaeology, and I tried to wade a bit into the debate around her by reading a number of articles, to better weigh Eisler's argument.
My conclusion: there are a couple strong points to the idea of a more egalitarian Neolithic society that had possible elements of a religion involving numerous goddesses. Anything after that, we can't really say for sure. Gimbutas, and by extension Eisler, with all her claims after those, moves onto increasingly shakier ground.*
I feel like my comments on the second half of the book, in which Eisler moves away from prehistory to deal with the political power men have had over women throughout history, can be dealt with by pointing out that it's unfortunate that Judith Butler's Gender Trouble came out in 1990, three years after Eisler first wrote this.
Eisler sees the main theme throughout history as "the struggle between so-called feminine and masculine values" (138). That "so-called" is oddly placed, because it's clear that Eisler sees women as the bearers of the peaceful virtues; men are "regressive and violent" unless they submit to a feminine value system.
Which made me realize why I also have trouble believing her claims about a women-oriented peaceful society. I think that true egalitarianism is more likely to be achieved by making our concepts of sex and gender less rigid, more fluid, and more varied, rather than dividing humanity into two halves and constantly trying to either make both halves stay on the correct side, or to persuade one half that they're not good enough because they're not like the other.
*[This book also made me realize how skeptical I am about archaeological evidence in general, but especially about the interpretation of ancient art and symbols. And this I attribute, in large part, to a single exercise done for a class I took on Philosophy and Science Fiction: We had to write a story in which Carl Sagan's Pioneer plaque (see it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pioneer_...) was found by either humans or another species who didn't know its origin but had to try and interpret it anyhow... it's pretty clear how ridiculous it is to believe that someone would come up with the "right" meaning.]
January 24, 2011
Loved this book. Helps clarify how we got where we are, and where we can go if we want to. Those who brush this off as feminazi aren't reading well. She reiterates many times that there are gentle men and less-than-gentle women. Nor does she say that the Neolithic matrifocal societies were uptopias with no problems, just that they focused on nurturing rather than destruction. Her ideas about a gylanic society based on linking rather than ranking are excellent and should be pursued.
January 16, 2020
Even though some details seem a bit questionable (possibly!?), many ideas are interesting and illuminating.
July 28, 2011
During the Neolithic times our world was a much different place. The evidence is present not only in our technology but also of the presence of certain statues all over Europe. They are called Venus statues. They were misjudged at first and archaeologists thought they were used for lustful purposes. Well they were wrong the statues were used to worship the Goddess. The Goddess was seen as the creator of all, the giver of birth. There was a male consort who co -ruled with her. In those times heritability was passed matrilineally going down mother through daughter. In those days men and women shared power and responsibility. Life was based on agriculture and fighters were not admired. Everyone had what they needed and there was no gap between rich and poor like there is today. This was the time of the chalice. When the Earth was bountiful. But something happened to change all that and people began to fight one another. It was a time of the blade.
Crete which was the seat of Minoan civilization. Was Goddess centered. Greek philosopher called these people divine. They had fertile land their art was pleasing to the eye. Violent kings were not worshiped. There were no weapon or art scenes glorifying violence.There was a queen running the civilization as evidenced by their elaborate tombs. The form of governments was called Gilany. Which meant partnership between man and women. This would change with the coming off the Acheans who stormed their island and took it over. It is believed that most of the men were killed and the women were kept on as slaves and wives.
The Acheans were of Indo European stock who worshiped a warlike male god. Originally they were nomads who had no agricultural skills to speak of. they relied on Pillage and plundering. Crete was one of the lat places to fall. The warlike Indo-Europeans took over practically all of Europe and abolished the Gilany life style in favor of Andocracy. Andocracy is male dominated system of ranking people through coercion of violence. The power elite takes all the privilege for themselves. In this system the Goddess is subdued. The Kurgans were the ones who over ran Europe.
Yet despite their best efforts they could not keep the Goddess and her enlightened ways down. In the legends of old which were refashioned putting the male God on top and the Goddess in the lower position even humiliating, were used to control the society they had conquered. All across Europe and the Levant women lost their positions of power. Priestess and oracles were abolished. In Sumerian Legend and later Biblical legend the Goddess under went a transformation. In the beginning, tree's or sacred groves were sacred places meant for dispensing wisdom and blessing. The snake was a healing sign. All this got turned on it's head. Now the women tempted by the evil serpent is tricked into eating of the tree of knowledge. For her stupidity both Adam and eve are sent out of the Garden of Eden or Sacred groves.
On he Island of Crete they entered the Mycenaean age which saw the blossoming of the old ways.The Acheans adopted thee ways of the people they conquered. Oracle were established and listened to . Academies set up that taught women equally with men. In the Levant a figure named Jesus arose preaching compassion, non aggression and that women were equal. Jesus appeared to Mary Magdalene first on his resurrection before coming to anybody else. She was almost the church leader. But of course Adocracy prevailed in the end. Later on the Dorians take over with a viscous onslaught. The ways of the Goddess creep up again.
Right now things are horrible under this andocratic system. We spend more on our military than feeding our children and educating them. One missile could feed hundreds and also fund some much needed areas in our schools. The idea of conquest and power must be replaced by Gilany or partnership.
Crete which was the seat of Minoan civilization. Was Goddess centered. Greek philosopher called these people divine. They had fertile land their art was pleasing to the eye. Violent kings were not worshiped. There were no weapon or art scenes glorifying violence.There was a queen running the civilization as evidenced by their elaborate tombs. The form of governments was called Gilany. Which meant partnership between man and women. This would change with the coming off the Acheans who stormed their island and took it over. It is believed that most of the men were killed and the women were kept on as slaves and wives.
The Acheans were of Indo European stock who worshiped a warlike male god. Originally they were nomads who had no agricultural skills to speak of. they relied on Pillage and plundering. Crete was one of the lat places to fall. The warlike Indo-Europeans took over practically all of Europe and abolished the Gilany life style in favor of Andocracy. Andocracy is male dominated system of ranking people through coercion of violence. The power elite takes all the privilege for themselves. In this system the Goddess is subdued. The Kurgans were the ones who over ran Europe.
Yet despite their best efforts they could not keep the Goddess and her enlightened ways down. In the legends of old which were refashioned putting the male God on top and the Goddess in the lower position even humiliating, were used to control the society they had conquered. All across Europe and the Levant women lost their positions of power. Priestess and oracles were abolished. In Sumerian Legend and later Biblical legend the Goddess under went a transformation. In the beginning, tree's or sacred groves were sacred places meant for dispensing wisdom and blessing. The snake was a healing sign. All this got turned on it's head. Now the women tempted by the evil serpent is tricked into eating of the tree of knowledge. For her stupidity both Adam and eve are sent out of the Garden of Eden or Sacred groves.
On he Island of Crete they entered the Mycenaean age which saw the blossoming of the old ways.The Acheans adopted thee ways of the people they conquered. Oracle were established and listened to . Academies set up that taught women equally with men. In the Levant a figure named Jesus arose preaching compassion, non aggression and that women were equal. Jesus appeared to Mary Magdalene first on his resurrection before coming to anybody else. She was almost the church leader. But of course Adocracy prevailed in the end. Later on the Dorians take over with a viscous onslaught. The ways of the Goddess creep up again.
Right now things are horrible under this andocratic system. We spend more on our military than feeding our children and educating them. One missile could feed hundreds and also fund some much needed areas in our schools. The idea of conquest and power must be replaced by Gilany or partnership.
January 15, 2017
So, I give this book 5 stars even though I know well the controversy about Gimbutas's work, Eisler based her prehistoric analysis on.
Eisler, as has for example Joseph Campbell, emphasizes how important the myth is to our evolution as a species and as a person. A mythology is psychological/spiritual model for us as we grow into maturity throughout our lives. I dived into the debate that has, and is going on online, and I haven't yet read Gimbutas's work. But, I have read Joseph Cambell's primitive mythology, and it seems few things are evident:
-there were numerous places with numerous females figurines to be found in the neolithic era.
- at the point around the horse tribes invasions, the figurines seem to have disappeared, and have not since existed in the western/middle eastern world, as compared for example, the hindu gods and goddess pairs and elsewhere.
- the rest of the books's history is unfortunately recorded brutal history of women's secondary and as such abused place in the history of human kind. No news there.
I think this book is a new paradigm. Sure, it's from 1987, but if we take a longer view, it's not that old. Unfortunately, the hope filled vision she has for the future- really like the Star Trek, isn't it?- seems to be yet further. But what is important about this whole book is that we could give Eisler's vision a possibility. Since the criticism claims 'we don't know for sure about the past', then one possibility of the past could be a more egalitarian society, which the graves seem to indicate. We need another vision for the pessimistic ' humans are just greedy bastards by nature and that's it'.
These days we even have science to back up that altruism benefits the human mental and physical health AND the society. The drop widens effect.
The book is very well written and researched. It's a hard read at times, even though nothing of it was new to me. Reminded me of Lars von Trier's Anti-Christ...Anyway, we don't know for sure about prehistoric beliefs, but do we need to? Or do we create our own myth seen that what we have up to now, has not worked instead endangered the life of the whole planet, as we know it. It's indeed time to get away from the masculine-feminine, black-white, ally-enemy thinking towards something completely different. This book inspired me and I want to read more about all this and more.
Eisler, as has for example Joseph Campbell, emphasizes how important the myth is to our evolution as a species and as a person. A mythology is psychological/spiritual model for us as we grow into maturity throughout our lives. I dived into the debate that has, and is going on online, and I haven't yet read Gimbutas's work. But, I have read Joseph Cambell's primitive mythology, and it seems few things are evident:
-there were numerous places with numerous females figurines to be found in the neolithic era.
- at the point around the horse tribes invasions, the figurines seem to have disappeared, and have not since existed in the western/middle eastern world, as compared for example, the hindu gods and goddess pairs and elsewhere.
- the rest of the books's history is unfortunately recorded brutal history of women's secondary and as such abused place in the history of human kind. No news there.
I think this book is a new paradigm. Sure, it's from 1987, but if we take a longer view, it's not that old. Unfortunately, the hope filled vision she has for the future- really like the Star Trek, isn't it?- seems to be yet further. But what is important about this whole book is that we could give Eisler's vision a possibility. Since the criticism claims 'we don't know for sure about the past', then one possibility of the past could be a more egalitarian society, which the graves seem to indicate. We need another vision for the pessimistic ' humans are just greedy bastards by nature and that's it'.
These days we even have science to back up that altruism benefits the human mental and physical health AND the society. The drop widens effect.
The book is very well written and researched. It's a hard read at times, even though nothing of it was new to me. Reminded me of Lars von Trier's Anti-Christ...Anyway, we don't know for sure about prehistoric beliefs, but do we need to? Or do we create our own myth seen that what we have up to now, has not worked instead endangered the life of the whole planet, as we know it. It's indeed time to get away from the masculine-feminine, black-white, ally-enemy thinking towards something completely different. This book inspired me and I want to read more about all this and more.
May 7, 2012
Not in a million years should The Chalice and the Blade be considered a work of feminism or competent scholarship in general. (Indeed, it is, in fact, widely rejected by even feminist archaeologists, anthropologists, and historians.) Many of Eisler's arguments are recycled from the later work of Marija Gimbutas, who claimed that Paleolithic and Neolithic "Venus" statuettes and figurines were representations of a "Mother Goddess." The speculation is plentiful, but the evidence is not. There is no consensus as to what the figures represented, but the claims reiterated by Eisler are just about the least likely explanation. It would require a near-monolithic religion to be present over tens of thousands of years, multiple continents, and through the agricultural revolution. This is more than an extreme stretch, especially if you're talking about Paleolithic hunter-gatherers and early Neolithic peoples. Furthermore, many of the figurines are of indeterminate gender. Even worse, many of the "Snake Goddess" statues and other artifacts from Crete were either forgeries or tampered with during restoration.
Shoddy scholarship such as this works to undermine legitimate revisionism, which may then be more easily written off as New Age crackpottery. It has certainly provided many anti-feminist writers with an easy straw woman to knock down.
For more, see the review in Arizona Anthropologist (Grindell 1993):
http://arizona.openrepository.com/ari...
Lynn Meskell's (1995) evisceration of the goddess hypothesis:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi...
Forgeries of "Minoan" artifacts (Lapatin 2001):
http://www.archaeology.org/0101/abstr...
Shoddy scholarship such as this works to undermine legitimate revisionism, which may then be more easily written off as New Age crackpottery. It has certainly provided many anti-feminist writers with an easy straw woman to knock down.
For more, see the review in Arizona Anthropologist (Grindell 1993):
http://arizona.openrepository.com/ari...
Lynn Meskell's (1995) evisceration of the goddess hypothesis:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi...
Forgeries of "Minoan" artifacts (Lapatin 2001):
http://www.archaeology.org/0101/abstr...
September 17, 2007
This was a life-changing book for me. It helped me to connect and make sense of all the stories and myths I had read about from other religions. In doing so, it firmly established the Goddess in my life, and as I look back it is responsible for my decision to become a Witch and devote my life to the feminine energy of the Goddess. I cannot say enough good things about this book. I feel it is a must for all spiritual women...an awesome book and a real eye-opener to say the least!!
October 5, 2011
Having just read Half the Sky, Infidel, and several books about the FLDS (Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints), I recalled this book which I had read a number of years ago. The Chalice and the Blade by Riane Eisler is a cultural anthropology and analysis of what she calls dominator societies vs partnership societies. The cultures in Half the Sky, for example, are extreme dominator societies. That women are not valued is how they work. What it takes to change them has been Eisler's life work since she wrote Chalice. She too has hope for the future. It's not an easy book to read at the start - you have to get through the first 60-70 pages before you get into what she's telling you. And too many readers don't get that far. If they do it's a profound book, not to be forgotten. Half the Sky is full of examples of what those cultures look like at their worst. Places where the courage of a few is so remarkable as to give the rest of us hope.
August 23, 2010
الكاتبة تشرح لنا عن منظوري الأنثوية ( متمثلة برمز الكأس المقدسة ) و الذكورية ( متمثلة برمز حد السكين )، أو كما تسميهما هي، مبدأ التشاركية ( الأنثوية ) ومبدأ الهيمنة ( الذكورية ) الاجتماعية، والمراحل التي مرت بها حضارتنا الإنسانية منذ العصور الحجرية وحتى اللحظة الحالياً في العمل بهذين المبدئين، بالإضافة إلى استقراء عام لاحتمالات المستقبل ..
تثبت لنا الكاتبة ببحثها الغني والعامر بالأدلة بأن حياة البشر لم تكن هكذا دائماً، ولم يكن التاريخ تدوينا للحروب، ولم تكن معايير فرض السيطرة والهرمية المجتمعية والعنصرية والعنف هي السائدة، كما تثبت أيضا من خلال الكتاب وجود توافق شديد بين التوازن الاجتماعي، والذي هو ضروري من أجل بيئة خلاقة ومبدعة ومسالمة، وبين إنصاف المرأة وإعطائها حقوقها والتعاطي معها بموجب الإنسانية ..
تؤمن الكاتبة بأن العالم يكتسب مزيدا من الوعي بهذا الخصوص، يوما بعد يوم، وأن العالم في طريقه إلى مسائلة الطرق والمنهجيات والآليات المهمينة حالياً، والتي أدت بنا إلى بيئة عليلة ونظام اجتماعي تعسفي وحياة خارج الطبيعة .. ومن هذا المنظور هي ترسم لنا مستقبلاً مختلفاً، في حال عاد منطق " الكأس المقدسة " إلى السيادة والاحترام، كما حدث في مجتمعات قديمة تثبتها أدلة أركيولوجية عديدة.
الكتاب مهم، لكل امرأة ولكل رجل، لكل شخص يهمه مستقبل الإنسان .. أنصح بقراءته بقوة.
تثبت لنا الكاتبة ببحثها الغني والعامر بالأدلة بأن حياة البشر لم تكن هكذا دائماً، ولم يكن التاريخ تدوينا للحروب، ولم تكن معايير فرض السيطرة والهرمية المجتمعية والعنصرية والعنف هي السائدة، كما تثبت أيضا من خلال الكتاب وجود توافق شديد بين التوازن الاجتماعي، والذي هو ضروري من أجل بيئة خلاقة ومبدعة ومسالمة، وبين إنصاف المرأة وإعطائها حقوقها والتعاطي معها بموجب الإنسانية ..
تؤمن الكاتبة بأن العالم يكتسب مزيدا من الوعي بهذا الخصوص، يوما بعد يوم، وأن العالم في طريقه إلى مسائلة الطرق والمنهجيات والآليات المهمينة حالياً، والتي أدت بنا إلى بيئة عليلة ونظام اجتماعي تعسفي وحياة خارج الطبيعة .. ومن هذا المنظور هي ترسم لنا مستقبلاً مختلفاً، في حال عاد منطق " الكأس المقدسة " إلى السيادة والاحترام، كما حدث في مجتمعات قديمة تثبتها أدلة أركيولوجية عديدة.
الكتاب مهم، لكل امرأة ولكل رجل، لكل شخص يهمه مستقبل الإنسان .. أنصح بقراءته بقوة.
March 17, 2012
'Attempts' to use evolutionary theory to explain how, through punctuated equilibrium, men rose up and took over the peaceful female-dominated societies all over the world. Apparently all men are evil 'blades' who want destruction and women are all good 'chalices' who believe in religion and want peace and harmony. Eisler argues that there has been a conspiracy within science to hide these early peaceful societies, as evidence she cites an anecdote about an anthropologist she really likes getting his funding removed. Throughout the book she uses anecdotes and her own reasoning, as opposed to actual evidence, to support her theory that for thousands of years these female dominated societies ruled the world and everything was peachy. Early on in the book she tells of 'goddess worship' in the form of 'vagina shaped sea shells' laid out on tombs. It was at this point I wanted to stab my eyes out and quit reading but I had to finish it for a class.
July 14, 2013
This book is comparable to such archaic utopian works as Engels' On the Family and E. Morgan's Descent of Women, but, like Morgan's, without the excuse of ignorance. When Engels wrote in the nineteenth century his ideas of a prehistoric cooperatism were at least plausible and, indeed, supported by contemporaneous anthropological work. When Morgan and Eisler wrote, however, much more work had been done and little evidence accumulated to support the hypothesis of an archaic social paradise.
Such evidences as she does adduce for her hypothesis are both very tendentiously selective and interpretatively dubious in every instance where I have some expertise--such as regards supposed "gnostic gospels."
Such evidences as she does adduce for her hypothesis are both very tendentiously selective and interpretatively dubious in every instance where I have some expertise--such as regards supposed "gnostic gospels."
January 27, 2009
Like DaVinci Code? Read this. This book is where the information came from, this book is the mother to many, many others...
June 17, 2024
OK OK ALREADY!!!!
After 30 years of friends/teachers/fellow travelers recommending/demanding that I read this.
I finally did.
And I’m SO glad I did.
And honestly.
I’m also glad I waited.
I don’t think I would I would have appreciated it as much when I was younger.
But DANG!
I sure do I appreciate it now.
Like.
PERFECT TIMING 🤓🙏🏻💕
This is a classic text.
So I won’t go into any detail in this review.
Just a few reflections.
The Chalice and the Blade is Riane Eisler’s
exegesis on the the evolution of human societies, from a “GYNOCRATIC” orientation focused on cooperation, community, care communication and creativity. Towards the phallogocentric PATRIARCHAL shit pile we currently inhabit.
BEFORE YOU OBJECT:
Hold up!
Eisler is sober and careful to state and restate, that these female driven ancient cultures were not UTOPIAN (by any stretch). Additionally, Eisler is a good scholar, and as such frames all of her assertions as hypotheses, and not as fact.
But (and) the vision of society she posits is SO DANG COMPELLING. And the arguments and evidence she cites are also SO DANG COMPELLING. That one (at lest this one) can’t help but GRIVE the loss of the SOFTER/NURTURING way of life Eisler describes. And equally INSPIRED at the prospect of returning to (or creating) a world based on these values.
METHODOLOGY:
Eisler uses extensive interdisciplinary research and methodology to construct and support her arguments,
One of the FRESHEST parts about Eisler is her WAY early adaptation of SYSTEMS THEORY in the analysis of culture.
She also ABANDONS MARXIST economics in favor of A FEMINIST ECONOMICS that prioritizes SUSTAINABILITY.
I LOVED all of that.
I MARVEL at Eisler’s ADVANCED THINKING on these issues.
AMAZING!
AGAIN:
Eisler’s work has been the subject of LOTS of CRITICISM. And this book is over 30 years old. So going in on the VERACITY of ALL of her claims is (at this point) a moot point.
Ya know?
I mean, what would be the point?
For me the VALUE here is in opening an alternate vision of what was and what could be. And restoring hope for a better future (if we survive).
THE CHALICE AND THE BLADE
Eisler offerers the CHALICE as a metonymy for the FEMALE INCLUSIVE egalitarian mode, what Eisler refers to as the “PARTNERSHIP Model”.
And the BLADE as a metonymy for the more hierarchical, competitive, and patriarchal mode, what Eisler refers to as the “DOMINATOR Model”.
THE CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION
Eisler posits that the transition from the PARTNERSHIP to the DOMINATOR model has OBVIOUS and PROFOUND implications for social organization, gender roles, and human relationships, not the least of which includes that whole global WARFARE/WARMING thing.
Again, Eisler attributes this CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION to various factors, including invasions by more aggressive tribes (DOOSHBAGS) and changes in economic and social structures (CAPITALISM), and in religious beliefs and practices (OF THE ABRAHAMIC ILK).
A SOFTER, SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
Eisler offers a HOPEFUL vision for the future.
Eisler opines that if society swung to the BLADE, we can swing it on back to the CHALICE.
CAPITALISM GUZZLES CARE.
Eisler posits a that a FEMINIST alternative to CAPITALISM would VALUE CARETAKING and CARETAKERS who perform it.
Ummm 🤔
Yes please.
That is unless we would prefer to raise another generation of children via iPADs. Or another send another generation of ELDERS to medical warehouses to be striped of their wealth, and sent to the landfill. As the EARTH BURNS 🔥.
All because we’re ALL WORKING ALL THE TIME out of a TOTALLY RATIONAL fear of being HOMELESS when we can’t.
IMPACT
The Chalice and the Blade made a BIG SPLASH back in the day. Eisler’s work continues to inspire, global racial and gender equality, social justice, and sustainable living movements.
Critics have debated Eisler’s interpretations of archaeological evidence and historical narratives, but the book remains IMPORTANT.
As mentioned.
I’m SO GLAD I WATED to read this.
It’s a COOL DRINK OF WATER right about NOW.
I think a MUCH YOUNGER me would have related to Eisler’s claims as GOSPEL. And MIDDLE me would have dismissed them whole cloth as UNREALISTIC. But ME NOW just LOVES, ENJOYS and APPRECIATES what Eisler SERVES.
ME NOW simply VOTES/PRAYES for…
1: MORE CHALICE
2: LESS BLADE
3: SOON PLEASE
5/5 stars ⭐️
After 30 years of friends/teachers/fellow travelers recommending/demanding that I read this.
I finally did.
And I’m SO glad I did.
And honestly.
I’m also glad I waited.
I don’t think I would I would have appreciated it as much when I was younger.
But DANG!
I sure do I appreciate it now.
Like.
PERFECT TIMING 🤓🙏🏻💕
This is a classic text.
So I won’t go into any detail in this review.
Just a few reflections.
The Chalice and the Blade is Riane Eisler’s
exegesis on the the evolution of human societies, from a “GYNOCRATIC” orientation focused on cooperation, community, care communication and creativity. Towards the phallogocentric PATRIARCHAL shit pile we currently inhabit.
BEFORE YOU OBJECT:
Hold up!
Eisler is sober and careful to state and restate, that these female driven ancient cultures were not UTOPIAN (by any stretch). Additionally, Eisler is a good scholar, and as such frames all of her assertions as hypotheses, and not as fact.
But (and) the vision of society she posits is SO DANG COMPELLING. And the arguments and evidence she cites are also SO DANG COMPELLING. That one (at lest this one) can’t help but GRIVE the loss of the SOFTER/NURTURING way of life Eisler describes. And equally INSPIRED at the prospect of returning to (or creating) a world based on these values.
METHODOLOGY:
Eisler uses extensive interdisciplinary research and methodology to construct and support her arguments,
One of the FRESHEST parts about Eisler is her WAY early adaptation of SYSTEMS THEORY in the analysis of culture.
She also ABANDONS MARXIST economics in favor of A FEMINIST ECONOMICS that prioritizes SUSTAINABILITY.
I LOVED all of that.
I MARVEL at Eisler’s ADVANCED THINKING on these issues.
AMAZING!
AGAIN:
Eisler’s work has been the subject of LOTS of CRITICISM. And this book is over 30 years old. So going in on the VERACITY of ALL of her claims is (at this point) a moot point.
Ya know?
I mean, what would be the point?
For me the VALUE here is in opening an alternate vision of what was and what could be. And restoring hope for a better future (if we survive).
THE CHALICE AND THE BLADE
Eisler offerers the CHALICE as a metonymy for the FEMALE INCLUSIVE egalitarian mode, what Eisler refers to as the “PARTNERSHIP Model”.
And the BLADE as a metonymy for the more hierarchical, competitive, and patriarchal mode, what Eisler refers to as the “DOMINATOR Model”.
THE CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION
Eisler posits that the transition from the PARTNERSHIP to the DOMINATOR model has OBVIOUS and PROFOUND implications for social organization, gender roles, and human relationships, not the least of which includes that whole global WARFARE/WARMING thing.
Again, Eisler attributes this CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION to various factors, including invasions by more aggressive tribes (DOOSHBAGS) and changes in economic and social structures (CAPITALISM), and in religious beliefs and practices (OF THE ABRAHAMIC ILK).
A SOFTER, SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
Eisler offers a HOPEFUL vision for the future.
Eisler opines that if society swung to the BLADE, we can swing it on back to the CHALICE.
CAPITALISM GUZZLES CARE.
Eisler posits a that a FEMINIST alternative to CAPITALISM would VALUE CARETAKING and CARETAKERS who perform it.
Ummm 🤔
Yes please.
That is unless we would prefer to raise another generation of children via iPADs. Or another send another generation of ELDERS to medical warehouses to be striped of their wealth, and sent to the landfill. As the EARTH BURNS 🔥.
All because we’re ALL WORKING ALL THE TIME out of a TOTALLY RATIONAL fear of being HOMELESS when we can’t.
IMPACT
The Chalice and the Blade made a BIG SPLASH back in the day. Eisler’s work continues to inspire, global racial and gender equality, social justice, and sustainable living movements.
Critics have debated Eisler’s interpretations of archaeological evidence and historical narratives, but the book remains IMPORTANT.
As mentioned.
I’m SO GLAD I WATED to read this.
It’s a COOL DRINK OF WATER right about NOW.
I think a MUCH YOUNGER me would have related to Eisler’s claims as GOSPEL. And MIDDLE me would have dismissed them whole cloth as UNREALISTIC. But ME NOW just LOVES, ENJOYS and APPRECIATES what Eisler SERVES.
ME NOW simply VOTES/PRAYES for…
1: MORE CHALICE
2: LESS BLADE
3: SOON PLEASE
5/5 stars ⭐️
February 25, 2013
Five stars. An exceptionally important, brilliant book. It is a rare book, indeed, that can change a person's entire view of human history.
I've seen copies around for years but never read it. I recently got a copy of a later book by Eisler (The Real Wealth of Nations), then saw a copy of TCATB for a dollar, and thought I would take a quick look at it first. I picked it up and was immediately engrossed. Starting about 10,000 years ago, and continuing for a period of about 30 centuries, widespread European, Mediterranean, and Mesopotamian peaceful communities of settled humans, revering goddesses of fertility, flourished.
These early civilizations invented principles of food growing, containers, pottery, clothing fibers, construction techniques, leather work, and later, metal technologies in silver, gold, brass, and bronze. "The words found in Sumerian texts for farmer, plow, and furrow are not Sumerian. Neither are the words for weaver, leathermaker, smith, mason, and potter." (p66)
There is much, much more--about Crete, about the waves of violent invaders with their horses, iron weapons, and thunderous, angry sky gods. But the part of the book that was an absolute revelation and liberation for me was how these two general patterns--peaceful settled communities invaded by male dominated violent nomads--apply specifically to the nomadic Hebrew tribes invading Caanan.
All of a sudden, the accounts in the Hebrew and Christian scripture about the Garden of Eden, the Tree of Knowledge, the Tree of Life begin to make deeper, more complete sense. As do the demonization and subjugation of women taught in our culture and reinforced by our preeminent religious tradition. Even the snake, previously a sacred feminine totem, is shown in a completely new light. Adding information gained by systematic analysis of archaeological evidence for many years completely shifted my understanding of this critical time in Western history.
There are still visible--buried in the Hebrew scriptures--many references to this previous culture:
"We will certainly do everything we said we would: We will burn incense to the Queen of Heaven and will pour out drink offerings to her just as we and our ancestors, our kings and our officials did in the towns of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem. At that time we had plenty of food and were well off and suffered no harm.
Jeremiah 44:16-18"
I was raised in a fundamentalist Christian family and know first hand that the violence, strictness, judgement, irrationality, and domination by men (and masculine values)are still very much alive in our culture.
I did not find the final quarter of the book as utterly absorbing, and must admit I find the terms "gylanic" and "gylany" awkward.
I do not know of a more important book to help return our cultural direction to a sustainable path.
I've seen copies around for years but never read it. I recently got a copy of a later book by Eisler (The Real Wealth of Nations), then saw a copy of TCATB for a dollar, and thought I would take a quick look at it first. I picked it up and was immediately engrossed. Starting about 10,000 years ago, and continuing for a period of about 30 centuries, widespread European, Mediterranean, and Mesopotamian peaceful communities of settled humans, revering goddesses of fertility, flourished.
These early civilizations invented principles of food growing, containers, pottery, clothing fibers, construction techniques, leather work, and later, metal technologies in silver, gold, brass, and bronze. "The words found in Sumerian texts for farmer, plow, and furrow are not Sumerian. Neither are the words for weaver, leathermaker, smith, mason, and potter." (p66)
There is much, much more--about Crete, about the waves of violent invaders with their horses, iron weapons, and thunderous, angry sky gods. But the part of the book that was an absolute revelation and liberation for me was how these two general patterns--peaceful settled communities invaded by male dominated violent nomads--apply specifically to the nomadic Hebrew tribes invading Caanan.
All of a sudden, the accounts in the Hebrew and Christian scripture about the Garden of Eden, the Tree of Knowledge, the Tree of Life begin to make deeper, more complete sense. As do the demonization and subjugation of women taught in our culture and reinforced by our preeminent religious tradition. Even the snake, previously a sacred feminine totem, is shown in a completely new light. Adding information gained by systematic analysis of archaeological evidence for many years completely shifted my understanding of this critical time in Western history.
There are still visible--buried in the Hebrew scriptures--many references to this previous culture:
"We will certainly do everything we said we would: We will burn incense to the Queen of Heaven and will pour out drink offerings to her just as we and our ancestors, our kings and our officials did in the towns of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem. At that time we had plenty of food and were well off and suffered no harm.
Jeremiah 44:16-18"
I was raised in a fundamentalist Christian family and know first hand that the violence, strictness, judgement, irrationality, and domination by men (and masculine values)are still very much alive in our culture.
I did not find the final quarter of the book as utterly absorbing, and must admit I find the terms "gylanic" and "gylany" awkward.
I do not know of a more important book to help return our cultural direction to a sustainable path.
April 30, 2025
This is a fascinating take on how archeology had to evolve from assumptions that all early societies were patriarchal (or at least seeing the findings through a patriarchal viewpoint) to acceptance of more recent evidence that the Neolithic Period particularly was equalitarian and non-patriarchal.
The chalice stands for actualization power; the blade for domination power. These are sometimes seen as female and male but more accurately, they are power through partnership versus power through violence and domination; creation and nurturing versus destruction; linking versus ranking.
Having had the pleasure of visiting the ruins at Knossos, the center of the ancient Minoan civilization in Crete, I thoroughly enjoyed Eisler’s exploration of this society. She describes it as a time when there was an acceptance of the grace of life, a sharing of wealth, and heavy investment in public works; a place where there were no signs of war. “These palaces are a superb blend of life-enhancing and eye-pleasing features, rather than the monuments to authority and power characteristic of Sumer, Egypt, Rome and other ancient war-like and male-dominated societies.” She says this peaceful society prevailed until around 1500 BC, when the Goddess was gradually displaced by warlike gods. “At the core of the invaders’ system was the placing of higher value on the power that takes, rather than gives, life.”
This evolution from chalice to blade took time and intention. “Directly, through personal coercion, and indirectly, through intermittent social shows of force such as public inquisitions and executions, behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions that did not conform to dominator norms were systematically discouraged.” Mythical symbols were re-fashioned to fit the new model.
It was so interesting to read this during this time of strong man political leaders. Published in 1984, it reads as hopeful that things were changing from a “dominator” back to a “partnership” society. Now it’s more clear than ever that we can devolve as easily as evolve, and it’s quite obvious that improvement is not a given, not a guarantee. But as long as we can envision a better society, we have hope.
“And as both technology and society have grown more complex, the survival of our species has become increasingly dependent on the direction, not of our biological, but of our cultural evolution.”
The chalice stands for actualization power; the blade for domination power. These are sometimes seen as female and male but more accurately, they are power through partnership versus power through violence and domination; creation and nurturing versus destruction; linking versus ranking.
Having had the pleasure of visiting the ruins at Knossos, the center of the ancient Minoan civilization in Crete, I thoroughly enjoyed Eisler’s exploration of this society. She describes it as a time when there was an acceptance of the grace of life, a sharing of wealth, and heavy investment in public works; a place where there were no signs of war. “These palaces are a superb blend of life-enhancing and eye-pleasing features, rather than the monuments to authority and power characteristic of Sumer, Egypt, Rome and other ancient war-like and male-dominated societies.” She says this peaceful society prevailed until around 1500 BC, when the Goddess was gradually displaced by warlike gods. “At the core of the invaders’ system was the placing of higher value on the power that takes, rather than gives, life.”
This evolution from chalice to blade took time and intention. “Directly, through personal coercion, and indirectly, through intermittent social shows of force such as public inquisitions and executions, behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions that did not conform to dominator norms were systematically discouraged.” Mythical symbols were re-fashioned to fit the new model.
It was so interesting to read this during this time of strong man political leaders. Published in 1984, it reads as hopeful that things were changing from a “dominator” back to a “partnership” society. Now it’s more clear than ever that we can devolve as easily as evolve, and it’s quite obvious that improvement is not a given, not a guarantee. But as long as we can envision a better society, we have hope.
“And as both technology and society have grown more complex, the survival of our species has become increasingly dependent on the direction, not of our biological, but of our cultural evolution.”
July 10, 2023
Estamos ante una de esas lecturas reveladoras, que te hacen abrir los ojos, reinterpretar lo vivido y aprendido, en definitiva, cuestionarte todo aquello que has dado por sentado durante toda tu vida. No, no se trata de un libro de autoayuda. El cáliz y la espada es un ejercicio de reflexión histórica en el que se nos muestra con todo detalle el tránsito experimentado por la humanidad desde una sociedad basada en la colaboración hacia otra basada en la dominación, cuyo objetivo final es el menoscabo de la mujer en todos los ámbitos y la glorificación del culto a la muerte y a la represión como pilares esenciales de la vida social y espiritual.
De lectura obligatoria para todo aquel que conserve u espíritu crítico. No apto para adoctrinados.
De lectura obligatoria para todo aquel que conserve u espíritu crítico. No apto para adoctrinados.
October 2, 2007
The first 66% of this book is fantastic-- a well-researched and developed argument that we must view our notions of anthropology and history with an extremely critical eye.
Unfortunately, the last third of the book leaves all that behind, and becomes a flight of fantasy as it describes what society might be like if based on a more egalitarian method.
So I recommend it based on the holes it punches in many of our most taken for granted beliefs on historic and prehistoric mankind, but don't put too much weight on its own conclusions.
Unfortunately, the last third of the book leaves all that behind, and becomes a flight of fantasy as it describes what society might be like if based on a more egalitarian method.
So I recommend it based on the holes it punches in many of our most taken for granted beliefs on historic and prehistoric mankind, but don't put too much weight on its own conclusions.
July 19, 2019
Riane Eisler was born in Vienna, Austria and with her family fled for their lives, first to Cuba and finally to the United States, experiencing three different cultures, each with their own version of truth and reality.
She began to ask herself many questions:
These and other questions lead her to re-examine the past, present and future, captured here in The Chalice and the Blade, looking at human history and pre-history and at both male and female aspects of humanity and in particular, those societies where the feminine aspect was revered.
This work gives rise to what she terms:
- the dominator model (popularly referred to as patriarchy or matriarchy) - the ranking of one half of humanity over another and
- the partnership model based on the principle of linking, affiliation and cooperation
Her work further suggests that:
Hence the title The Chalice (the life-generating and nurturing powers of the universe - in our time symbolized by the ancient chalice or grail) and the Blade the power to take rather than give life that is the ultimate power to establish and enforce domination.
She reevaluates the past and present, sharing research that has been ignored or misinterpreted to show:
showing that our mounting global problems are in large part the logical consequences of a dominator model of social organisation and that there is another course which, as co-creators of our own future experience, is still ours to choose.
From the paleolithic, the neolithic, Old Europe, Goddess worship and the unique long lasting civilization of Crete to the invaders, the colonizers, warfare, slavery and sacrifice, we see the world and our reality through a different lens and yet once you've seen it, you recognize it, without realizing how it acts on us, in our homes, our workplaces, ours schools, institutions, governments.
It is so interesting to read this, originally written in 1987, over 30 years ago, in the context of our reality today. It provides a unique perspective on our history and analyzes it rigorously and yet in an easily understandable and accessible way, synthesizing information from a varieties of sources and disciplines to give us this helpful view of the influences that have been directing our progress (or lack of) suggesting the greater role that a more feminine (yin) collaborative, partnership approach might bring.
Though this was written 30 years ago, there is in fact a sequel due to be published in 2019, in collaboration with peace anthropologist Douglas P. Fry Nurturing Our Humanity: How Domination and Partnership Shape Our Brains, Lives, and Future exploring how behaviors, values, and socio-economic institutions develop differently in these two environments, revealing connections between disturbing trends like climate change denial and regressions to strongman rule. It combines Eisler’s partnership-domination social scale with extensive evidence from neuroscience and other fields.
It shows that, contrary to popular beliefs about “selfish genes” driving human behavior, how people think and feel is heavily influenced by whether they grow up in partnership or domination oriented environments. It also documents that in reality humans in the course of evolution developed a propensity for empathy, caring, and creativity, which is, however, inhibited in domination systems. It further points to interventions that can accelerate the contemporary movement toward partnership and prevent further regressions to domination.
About the Author
Riane Eisler, JD, PhD (hon), is President of the Center for Partnership Studies, Editor-in-Chief of the Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies, internationally known as a systems scientist, cultural historian, pioneering attorney working for women's and children's human rights, and recipient of many awards. Her groundbreaking books include The Chalice and the Blade, Tomorrow's Children, and The Real Wealth of Nations. She lectures worldwide, keynoting conferences, addressing the U.N. General Assembly, U.S. State Department, corporations, and universities. Her website is https://rianeeisler.com/.
Very early in my life I saw that what people in different cultures consider given - just the way things are - is not the same everywhere. I also very early developed a passionate concern about the human situation.
She began to ask herself many questions:
Why do we hunt and persecute each other? Why is our world so full of man's infamous inhumanity to man - and woman? How can humans be so brutal to their own kind? What is it that chronically tilts us toward cruelty rather than kindness, toward war rather than peace, toward destruction rather than actualization?
These and other questions lead her to re-examine the past, present and future, captured here in The Chalice and the Blade, looking at human history and pre-history and at both male and female aspects of humanity and in particular, those societies where the feminine aspect was revered.
This work gives rise to what she terms:
- the dominator model (popularly referred to as patriarchy or matriarchy) - the ranking of one half of humanity over another and
- the partnership model based on the principle of linking, affiliation and cooperation
Her work further suggests that:
the original direction in the mainstream of our cultural evolution was toward partnership but that, following a period of chaos and almost total cultural disruption, there occurred a fundamental shift.
Hence the title The Chalice (the life-generating and nurturing powers of the universe - in our time symbolized by the ancient chalice or grail) and the Blade the power to take rather than give life that is the ultimate power to establish and enforce domination.
She reevaluates the past and present, sharing research that has been ignored or misinterpreted to show:
The chapters explore the roots of...how the original partnership direction of Western culture veered off into a bloody 5,000 year dominator detour
showing that our mounting global problems are in large part the logical consequences of a dominator model of social organisation and that there is another course which, as co-creators of our own future experience, is still ours to choose.
From the paleolithic, the neolithic, Old Europe, Goddess worship and the unique long lasting civilization of Crete to the invaders, the colonizers, warfare, slavery and sacrifice, we see the world and our reality through a different lens and yet once you've seen it, you recognize it, without realizing how it acts on us, in our homes, our workplaces, ours schools, institutions, governments.
It is so interesting to read this, originally written in 1987, over 30 years ago, in the context of our reality today. It provides a unique perspective on our history and analyzes it rigorously and yet in an easily understandable and accessible way, synthesizing information from a varieties of sources and disciplines to give us this helpful view of the influences that have been directing our progress (or lack of) suggesting the greater role that a more feminine (yin) collaborative, partnership approach might bring.
Though this was written 30 years ago, there is in fact a sequel due to be published in 2019, in collaboration with peace anthropologist Douglas P. Fry Nurturing Our Humanity: How Domination and Partnership Shape Our Brains, Lives, and Future exploring how behaviors, values, and socio-economic institutions develop differently in these two environments, revealing connections between disturbing trends like climate change denial and regressions to strongman rule. It combines Eisler’s partnership-domination social scale with extensive evidence from neuroscience and other fields.
It shows that, contrary to popular beliefs about “selfish genes” driving human behavior, how people think and feel is heavily influenced by whether they grow up in partnership or domination oriented environments. It also documents that in reality humans in the course of evolution developed a propensity for empathy, caring, and creativity, which is, however, inhibited in domination systems. It further points to interventions that can accelerate the contemporary movement toward partnership and prevent further regressions to domination.
About the Author
Riane Eisler, JD, PhD (hon), is President of the Center for Partnership Studies, Editor-in-Chief of the Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies, internationally known as a systems scientist, cultural historian, pioneering attorney working for women's and children's human rights, and recipient of many awards. Her groundbreaking books include The Chalice and the Blade, Tomorrow's Children, and The Real Wealth of Nations. She lectures worldwide, keynoting conferences, addressing the U.N. General Assembly, U.S. State Department, corporations, and universities. Her website is https://rianeeisler.com/.
May 15, 2010
I am grateful to have been given the opportunity to read this book. A lot of what I read in its pages changed my entire worldview and caused me to reevaluate the history of the world as I knew it through a feminist lense and to change how I felt and thought about that history. There was a lot in this book that I didn’t completely agree with but there were many parts that I was glad to have read and have reached a deeper and richer understanding of the world because of it.
The Chalice and the Blade is a book divided into two basic parts. The lion's share of the book is devoted to a detailed history of human kind comparing and contrasting the two different basic types of worship: god worship and goddess worship, worship of a dominating war-like god and worship of a nurturing loving goddess. The societies that practiced these are taken apart and examined and a lot of history is re-evaluated along these lines of dominator societies and equality societies.
The beginning was fascinating to read about, to hear about these societies that practiced worship of a female goddess that were run by a semi-democratic government with women making up the majority of the leadership. To hear about the research and archaeological work on these sites, the fact that they had paved roads, irrigation systems, drainage systems, and probably lived in better and cleaner cities than some people in third and fourth world countries today can boast of, eight thousand years before the birth of Christ was absolutely stunning to read about. To hear about their destruction at the hands of dominator societies, heartbreaking.
A lot of history starts to make sense once you read the beginning chapters of this book. How do we learn such amazing things and then "forget" them for centuries on end? Why does our society seem to stagnate for thousands of years at a time? What happened to the goddesses of long ago? These and more are answered and the answers make this book worth the read in my opinion.
Some of this book seems very anti-christian and anti-semitic. Those parts were a little uncomfortable to read about. It does explain why the first half of the bible is filled with war and hate and the second half peace and love. If you can hold on until chapter nine the answers will surprised you. This author is not anti-religion, just anti-hate. Jesus Christ was actually one of the first recorded, and definitely the loudest, speaker for the support of love and equality of all people. After reading the chapters that came before, you realize how amazing it is that he spoke the way he did in the time and society that he did. It was pure blasphemy.
A lot of the coverage of the more recent history I didn't really agree with. This happened a few times in the earlier chapters but it happened a lot later. It seemed like the author just went too far and tried to draw the lines of comparison too much and in places where they didn't belong. Was there a hatred that sparked Jesus' disciples to try and oust the women placed in positions of leadership in the church? Yes. Was the same hatred of women and their gaining of equality and rights what helped spark World War I and II? Not so much. Her expertise is clearly with the former and not the later.
In spite of that and the ending, which seemed to me to have lost its way, this was a powerful and enlightening book. Read it for the first three quarters if nothing else. The new insight and the new worldview you will gain about the history of god and goddess worshiping cultures makes it worth it. Just be prepared to switch gears once she gets beyond her realm of expertise as she does stumble in the last few chapters, and by the end finds that while this new understanding can change how we view our past not even she can come up with a way for it to help guide our future. Many questions are answered in this book, but some we just have to answer for ourselves.
The Chalice and the Blade is a book divided into two basic parts. The lion's share of the book is devoted to a detailed history of human kind comparing and contrasting the two different basic types of worship: god worship and goddess worship, worship of a dominating war-like god and worship of a nurturing loving goddess. The societies that practiced these are taken apart and examined and a lot of history is re-evaluated along these lines of dominator societies and equality societies.
The beginning was fascinating to read about, to hear about these societies that practiced worship of a female goddess that were run by a semi-democratic government with women making up the majority of the leadership. To hear about the research and archaeological work on these sites, the fact that they had paved roads, irrigation systems, drainage systems, and probably lived in better and cleaner cities than some people in third and fourth world countries today can boast of, eight thousand years before the birth of Christ was absolutely stunning to read about. To hear about their destruction at the hands of dominator societies, heartbreaking.
A lot of history starts to make sense once you read the beginning chapters of this book. How do we learn such amazing things and then "forget" them for centuries on end? Why does our society seem to stagnate for thousands of years at a time? What happened to the goddesses of long ago? These and more are answered and the answers make this book worth the read in my opinion.
Some of this book seems very anti-christian and anti-semitic. Those parts were a little uncomfortable to read about. It does explain why the first half of the bible is filled with war and hate and the second half peace and love. If you can hold on until chapter nine the answers will surprised you. This author is not anti-religion, just anti-hate. Jesus Christ was actually one of the first recorded, and definitely the loudest, speaker for the support of love and equality of all people. After reading the chapters that came before, you realize how amazing it is that he spoke the way he did in the time and society that he did. It was pure blasphemy.
A lot of the coverage of the more recent history I didn't really agree with. This happened a few times in the earlier chapters but it happened a lot later. It seemed like the author just went too far and tried to draw the lines of comparison too much and in places where they didn't belong. Was there a hatred that sparked Jesus' disciples to try and oust the women placed in positions of leadership in the church? Yes. Was the same hatred of women and their gaining of equality and rights what helped spark World War I and II? Not so much. Her expertise is clearly with the former and not the later.
In spite of that and the ending, which seemed to me to have lost its way, this was a powerful and enlightening book. Read it for the first three quarters if nothing else. The new insight and the new worldview you will gain about the history of god and goddess worshiping cultures makes it worth it. Just be prepared to switch gears once she gets beyond her realm of expertise as she does stumble in the last few chapters, and by the end finds that while this new understanding can change how we view our past not even she can come up with a way for it to help guide our future. Many questions are answered in this book, but some we just have to answer for ourselves.
October 9, 2024
This book genuinely changed the way I think and interact in the world. It proved to me that human nature can be peaceful and cooperative, and we can choose to be that way again.
In the book Eisler presents two different kinds of societies: partnership or dominator. The partnership society is based on equality and doing things for the common good, while a dominator society is based on hierarchies and violence. Take a guess as to what our society is currently (yikes). In the book, she presents archeological evidence that suggests that our most ancient societies were partnership societies—there is no evidence of weaponry, house/grave sizes suggest that they were egalitarian, they worshiped a Mother Goddess, and were deeply connected to nature. These partnership societies lasted for thousands of years until they were ultimately crushed by nomad dominator groups. But the dominator society as the norm in terms of all of human history is actually relatively new. So people who say "this is the way it's always been" when speaking of human violence and patriarchy are, quite simply, wrong.
Eisler wrote this book during the fear of nuclear war in the 1980s and after fleeing from Nazi Germany as a child. Her thesis is this: "All is not hopeless if we recognize it is not human nature but a dominator model of society that in our age of high technology inexorably drives us to nuclear war. All is not futile if we recognize that it is this system, not some inexorable divine or natural law, that demands the use of technological breakthroughs for better ways of dominating and destroying... In short, if we look at our present from the perspective of Cultural Transformation theory, it becomes evident that there are alternatives to a system founded on the force-based ranking of one half of humanity over the other."
In a world where there is always war and genocide, it is hard to fathom that there can be another way. But there can. And there has. It is not human nature, it is a choice. We can collectively choose to build up rather than tear down.
My favorite part of this book were the first three chapters, which outline what the values of these ancient partnership societies were. The worship of the Mother Goddess helped the people view power in a completely different way. Power was the responsibility to take care of others rather than to dominate them, like a mother takes care of her children. In death, they would perform a ceremony that symbolically portrayed the dead being reborn into new life. In life, they trusted that the Mother Creator and Mother Earth would provide them with all they needed, and so they also provided for others in need. Eisler emphasizes that this was not a utopia, but it was a way of life. And the people loved living! And they loved nature! And they loved art! And they loved each other!
This book is not perfect. The thinking is pretty binary. She views feminism as the most important of social movements, which I disagree with (intersectional feminism for the win). But it helped me in my existential crisis around death and restored my faith in humanity. I'll be thinking about it and rereading it for years to come.
I'll end with this quote: "The old love for life and nature and the old ways of sharing rather than taking away, of caring for rather than oppressing, and the view of power as responsibility rather than domination did not die out. But, like women and qualities associated with femininity, they were relegated to a secondary place." I am striving to do my part in creating a world where these values are given the highest priority.
In the book Eisler presents two different kinds of societies: partnership or dominator. The partnership society is based on equality and doing things for the common good, while a dominator society is based on hierarchies and violence. Take a guess as to what our society is currently (yikes). In the book, she presents archeological evidence that suggests that our most ancient societies were partnership societies—there is no evidence of weaponry, house/grave sizes suggest that they were egalitarian, they worshiped a Mother Goddess, and were deeply connected to nature. These partnership societies lasted for thousands of years until they were ultimately crushed by nomad dominator groups. But the dominator society as the norm in terms of all of human history is actually relatively new. So people who say "this is the way it's always been" when speaking of human violence and patriarchy are, quite simply, wrong.
Eisler wrote this book during the fear of nuclear war in the 1980s and after fleeing from Nazi Germany as a child. Her thesis is this: "All is not hopeless if we recognize it is not human nature but a dominator model of society that in our age of high technology inexorably drives us to nuclear war. All is not futile if we recognize that it is this system, not some inexorable divine or natural law, that demands the use of technological breakthroughs for better ways of dominating and destroying... In short, if we look at our present from the perspective of Cultural Transformation theory, it becomes evident that there are alternatives to a system founded on the force-based ranking of one half of humanity over the other."
In a world where there is always war and genocide, it is hard to fathom that there can be another way. But there can. And there has. It is not human nature, it is a choice. We can collectively choose to build up rather than tear down.
My favorite part of this book were the first three chapters, which outline what the values of these ancient partnership societies were. The worship of the Mother Goddess helped the people view power in a completely different way. Power was the responsibility to take care of others rather than to dominate them, like a mother takes care of her children. In death, they would perform a ceremony that symbolically portrayed the dead being reborn into new life. In life, they trusted that the Mother Creator and Mother Earth would provide them with all they needed, and so they also provided for others in need. Eisler emphasizes that this was not a utopia, but it was a way of life. And the people loved living! And they loved nature! And they loved art! And they loved each other!
This book is not perfect. The thinking is pretty binary. She views feminism as the most important of social movements, which I disagree with (intersectional feminism for the win). But it helped me in my existential crisis around death and restored my faith in humanity. I'll be thinking about it and rereading it for years to come.
I'll end with this quote: "The old love for life and nature and the old ways of sharing rather than taking away, of caring for rather than oppressing, and the view of power as responsibility rather than domination did not die out. But, like women and qualities associated with femininity, they were relegated to a secondary place." I am striving to do my part in creating a world where these values are given the highest priority.
November 25, 2015
"...in individuals as in nations, contentment is silent, which tends to unbalance the historical record."
This often overlooked truth, advanced by historian Barbara W. Tuchman, is wielded with a vengeance in Riane Eisler's The Chalice and the Blade. Eisler directs our attention to the least advertised stages of societal evolution, those of relative peace and prosperity, in which nothing strident rises up to catch the eye - and which we fail, rather consistently, to recognize as eras of manifest achievement. Century upon century of solid, sustained and quite routine existence has occurred, and the fact that I couldn't put my finger on one (that finger notorious for skipping to the war, the outrage, the despot, the destruction) served to bring me up short and follow, for a time, where this author meant to lead.
It is Eisler's contention that humanity is possessed of two different approaches to the living of a communal life. One is the dominator model in which all resources, powers and intent are directed toward progress through suppression. Here are the marauders, the invaders, the warriors, the kings; the students of the blade. The second approach is referred to as the partnership model (or chalice). This avenue directs all resources, powers and intent toward progress through supportive connection. Here are the builders, the naturalists, the artisans, the caretakers; those who choose to spend less energy on ranking and more on linking the disparate forces they happen across. It is Eisler's assertion that these models are in constant flux, with the dominator most frequently in the ascendant - and one of the results of that ascendancy has been the suppression in our histories of those peaceful and prosperous times in which the partnership model thrived. (An adversarial response to be sure.)
Simply placing these ideas in context is supremely delicate work. It becomes obvious quite quickly that the fundamental concept can exist only as an indistinct impression. Our language and current modes of thinking clearly aren't set up for this. Yet Eisler perseveres, applying her considerations to nations, religions and cultures throughout the ages. We end in starkly feminist territory which, frankly, I've found can be a minefield for material of this sort. Still, it's worth the risk. If you are fond of that perilous feeling you get when your mind perches on the very verge of expansion? You'll have some fun with this.
This often overlooked truth, advanced by historian Barbara W. Tuchman, is wielded with a vengeance in Riane Eisler's The Chalice and the Blade. Eisler directs our attention to the least advertised stages of societal evolution, those of relative peace and prosperity, in which nothing strident rises up to catch the eye - and which we fail, rather consistently, to recognize as eras of manifest achievement. Century upon century of solid, sustained and quite routine existence has occurred, and the fact that I couldn't put my finger on one (that finger notorious for skipping to the war, the outrage, the despot, the destruction) served to bring me up short and follow, for a time, where this author meant to lead.
It is Eisler's contention that humanity is possessed of two different approaches to the living of a communal life. One is the dominator model in which all resources, powers and intent are directed toward progress through suppression. Here are the marauders, the invaders, the warriors, the kings; the students of the blade. The second approach is referred to as the partnership model (or chalice). This avenue directs all resources, powers and intent toward progress through supportive connection. Here are the builders, the naturalists, the artisans, the caretakers; those who choose to spend less energy on ranking and more on linking the disparate forces they happen across. It is Eisler's assertion that these models are in constant flux, with the dominator most frequently in the ascendant - and one of the results of that ascendancy has been the suppression in our histories of those peaceful and prosperous times in which the partnership model thrived. (An adversarial response to be sure.)
Simply placing these ideas in context is supremely delicate work. It becomes obvious quite quickly that the fundamental concept can exist only as an indistinct impression. Our language and current modes of thinking clearly aren't set up for this. Yet Eisler perseveres, applying her considerations to nations, religions and cultures throughout the ages. We end in starkly feminist territory which, frankly, I've found can be a minefield for material of this sort. Still, it's worth the risk. If you are fond of that perilous feeling you get when your mind perches on the very verge of expansion? You'll have some fun with this.
February 13, 2012
I found this book to be more a work of speculative fiction than the cultural anthropology that it pretends to be.
March 11, 2021
I loved this book! :) Ms. Eisler proposes both a very interesting view of the flow of history, touching on its dialetical nature, and also paints a path forward to put us into a society which closely mirrors my own, anarcho-communist views.
I would highly recommend this book to any student of history or politics, or anyone who just wants to perhaps have a deeper understanding of the ebb and flow of society.
I would highly recommend this book to any student of history or politics, or anyone who just wants to perhaps have a deeper understanding of the ebb and flow of society.
September 15, 2011
Eisler reframes the age old idea of the 'war between the sexes' into something equally polarizing, yet more inclusive. Many people have examined the problems of humanity as an inevitable outcome of our innate aggression and territoriality. Our history clearly how the forces of war, colonialism, nationalism and greed have shaped the world as we know it.
On closer inspection, however, the picture is less clear than we have long believed. I was surprised to learn that archaeology, as a science, only became serious after World War II. Before this time, Egyptology and the like were mostly a front for imperialistic grave robbers, vying for the shiniest addition to their national museums. Dating of artifacts was done through assumption until the advent of carbon 14 technology and dendrochronography. All of this combined created a vision of the past that was heavily tainted by the expectations and experience of those who unearthed ancient sites.
Proper dating technology has painted a new picture of the ancient past. It seems that in many parts of Old Europe, there were Goddess worshiping cultures that harnessed their intelligence towards creating healthy communities. In these cities, sometimes occupied for millenia, there is no evidence of weapons, ruler-kings, or the glorification of war. In fact, some sites were occupied for thousands of years without any evidence of war. These cultures showed a surprising equality between the sexes, as well as a lack of hierarchy. The concentration of wealth by the powerful that we take for granted is something that came much later.
As the nomadic herding tribes migrated into the regions occupied by these Neolithic culture, they found great wealth and little defensive technology. The cities were rather ripe for the plucking. Once this occurred, people reorganized their focus, working hard to develop weapons technology for offensive and defensive purposes. This arms race continues in the present day.
The unfortunate side effect of this race is that early technological advances in city planning, in art, and other technologies of peace were put aside in the face of this new human created danger. Earlier assumptions about the dates of some primitive looking artifacts turned out to be wrong; after war came to these cultures, their technological development came to a halt, and much technology was lost and forgotten.
These peaceful Neolithic cultures predate Sumer by millennia. Sumer is often recognized as the cradle of civilization; it would be better to describe it as the cradle of modern culture of warfare. Eisler calls these cultures "dominator cultures", whereas the earlier Goddess worshiping groups engaged in a partnership model. By the time that Sumer was in full swing, the partnership model had been overcome by the warrior culture of the nomadic steppes.
As we hurtle into the 21st century, we spend unthinkable amounts of resources coming with better ways to kill each other. The amount of resources spent on military budgets worldwide could transform our world if we put them to better use. We have the technology to feed, clothe, and house people, but as long as we surrender to the dominator model, resources will continue to be concentrated in the hands of the few while the many suffer from need and lack. Eisler urges us to give up the old ways of aggressive ranking and warfare, and create a new world in which we find solutions that work to build communities, create prosperity, and improve the quality of life for our entire human family.
On closer inspection, however, the picture is less clear than we have long believed. I was surprised to learn that archaeology, as a science, only became serious after World War II. Before this time, Egyptology and the like were mostly a front for imperialistic grave robbers, vying for the shiniest addition to their national museums. Dating of artifacts was done through assumption until the advent of carbon 14 technology and dendrochronography. All of this combined created a vision of the past that was heavily tainted by the expectations and experience of those who unearthed ancient sites.
Proper dating technology has painted a new picture of the ancient past. It seems that in many parts of Old Europe, there were Goddess worshiping cultures that harnessed their intelligence towards creating healthy communities. In these cities, sometimes occupied for millenia, there is no evidence of weapons, ruler-kings, or the glorification of war. In fact, some sites were occupied for thousands of years without any evidence of war. These cultures showed a surprising equality between the sexes, as well as a lack of hierarchy. The concentration of wealth by the powerful that we take for granted is something that came much later.
As the nomadic herding tribes migrated into the regions occupied by these Neolithic culture, they found great wealth and little defensive technology. The cities were rather ripe for the plucking. Once this occurred, people reorganized their focus, working hard to develop weapons technology for offensive and defensive purposes. This arms race continues in the present day.
The unfortunate side effect of this race is that early technological advances in city planning, in art, and other technologies of peace were put aside in the face of this new human created danger. Earlier assumptions about the dates of some primitive looking artifacts turned out to be wrong; after war came to these cultures, their technological development came to a halt, and much technology was lost and forgotten.
These peaceful Neolithic cultures predate Sumer by millennia. Sumer is often recognized as the cradle of civilization; it would be better to describe it as the cradle of modern culture of warfare. Eisler calls these cultures "dominator cultures", whereas the earlier Goddess worshiping groups engaged in a partnership model. By the time that Sumer was in full swing, the partnership model had been overcome by the warrior culture of the nomadic steppes.
As we hurtle into the 21st century, we spend unthinkable amounts of resources coming with better ways to kill each other. The amount of resources spent on military budgets worldwide could transform our world if we put them to better use. We have the technology to feed, clothe, and house people, but as long as we surrender to the dominator model, resources will continue to be concentrated in the hands of the few while the many suffer from need and lack. Eisler urges us to give up the old ways of aggressive ranking and warfare, and create a new world in which we find solutions that work to build communities, create prosperity, and improve the quality of life for our entire human family.
September 5, 2022
Can I agree that there has been a male-dominated lens in interpreting history and archaeological finds? Yes. Can I agree that women have been more or less left out of the story of human history until fairly recently? Also, yes. However, an agreement with a portion of the premise does not garner a good rating for this book.
It's disappointing that the scholarship wasn't more strict because I think this is a needed perspective. But because there are too many passages that needed more citation*/less opinion, I don't think this holds up as a book that is supposed to, at least in part, discuss history. I also felt that the author had somewhat of a tone of spoon-feeding things to the reader.
*Of the references that are present, as other reviewers here and elsewhere have noted, some of it has since been found inaccurate by modern anthropology.
I'll concede that it's possible that the popularity of this book and its position has in turn been influential, but my review is limited to the text between the front and back covers set against the context of anthropological research available today.
It's disappointing that the scholarship wasn't more strict because I think this is a needed perspective. But because there are too many passages that needed more citation*/less opinion, I don't think this holds up as a book that is supposed to, at least in part, discuss history. I also felt that the author had somewhat of a tone of spoon-feeding things to the reader.
*Of the references that are present, as other reviewers here and elsewhere have noted, some of it has since been found inaccurate by modern anthropology.
I'll concede that it's possible that the popularity of this book and its position has in turn been influential, but my review is limited to the text between the front and back covers set against the context of anthropological research available today.
August 7, 2011
My personal change agent. I read this book at a juncture in my life when many things were changing. I have read Chalice more than 5 times, have been in book studies on it and led them as well. In nearly every case women who have not encountered information like this before have often profound experiences with waking up. My copy is dog-eared, underlined, commented in and loved dearly for what it has brought me and other women I love.
December 12, 2021
3,5/5
He tardado un poco, pero ha sido una lectura muy interesante. He de admitir que en algunos momentos se me hacía repetitivo el discurso, pero se aportan datos interesantes para comprender la sociedad en la que vivimos y pensar en que tal vez, poniendo todos de nuestra parte, podamos crear una sociedad mejor.
He tardado un poco, pero ha sido una lectura muy interesante. He de admitir que en algunos momentos se me hacía repetitivo el discurso, pero se aportan datos interesantes para comprender la sociedad en la que vivimos y pensar en que tal vez, poniendo todos de nuestra parte, podamos crear una sociedad mejor.
July 22, 2023
Imprescindible.
February 5, 2010
Riane Eisler's book arguing that ancient Europe, and especially the island of Crete, were matriarchal pseudo-utopias that were ruined by invading patriarchal bands from the North is a persuasive and engaging read. There's only one big problem. That is, she's wrong about nearly everything.
Her arguments have been almost totally discredited by modern anthropoligists. Contrary to her statements, these ancient cultures DID have fortresses, weopons, etc. There is also very little evidence that they were matriarchies. Eisler also sees evidence of goddesses everywhere in these cultures. Again, almost all archiologists in this area contradict her statements, instead saying that the images and artifacts that she cites are of unknown meaning at best.
In short, this is a work of historical revisionism that uses dubious evidence and "beautiful people" myths to support its arguments. Or as another reviewer put it: she uses her "evidence" only to support the conclusion that she started with in the first place.
Her arguments have been almost totally discredited by modern anthropoligists. Contrary to her statements, these ancient cultures DID have fortresses, weopons, etc. There is also very little evidence that they were matriarchies. Eisler also sees evidence of goddesses everywhere in these cultures. Again, almost all archiologists in this area contradict her statements, instead saying that the images and artifacts that she cites are of unknown meaning at best.
In short, this is a work of historical revisionism that uses dubious evidence and "beautiful people" myths to support its arguments. Or as another reviewer put it: she uses her "evidence" only to support the conclusion that she started with in the first place.
January 27, 2009
It tends to happen that each new book I read then becomes my favorite - but this book did such a good job answering so many questions for me (giving me a system wide look instead of too focused) that I am now in awe of my new worldview. She answered my questions of "Where did patriarchy come from? How did it begin and why has it lasted as our social system to this day? What better possibilities can we aim for?"
The Chalice and the Blade is a very level headed approach to what is often a heated topic. Feminism is often viewed from the perspective of women and issues that face them, but this book looks beyond that to society as a whole, giving us a better option for the future. This book also helps me feel better preprared to talk about and debate the issue and advocate for that better future.
The Chalice and the Blade is a very level headed approach to what is often a heated topic. Feminism is often viewed from the perspective of women and issues that face them, but this book looks beyond that to society as a whole, giving us a better option for the future. This book also helps me feel better preprared to talk about and debate the issue and advocate for that better future.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 440 reviews