This 1st volume of Wittgenstein's Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology was written between 10/1948 & 3/1949, when the philosopher had moved to Dublin & was having one of his most fruitful working periods. He then finished work which he had begun in 1946 & which in its entirety constitutes the source material for Part II of the "Philosophical Investigations". When, later in 1949, Wittgenstein composed the manuscript for Part II he selected more than half the remarks for it from the Dublin manuscript. Altho this material is a direct continuation of the writings which make up the two volumes of the Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology it deserves more than they to be regarded as a "preliminary study" for the 2nd part of his "chef-d'oeuvre".
Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (Ph.D., Trinity College, Cambridge University, 1929) was an Austrian-British philosopher who worked primarily in logic, the philosophy of mathematics, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of language.
Described by Bertrand Russell as "the most perfect example I have ever known of genius as traditionally conceived, passionate, profound, intense, and dominating", he helped inspire two of the twentieth century's principal philosophical movements: the Vienna Circle and Oxford ordinary language philosophy. According to an end of the century poll, professional philosophers in Canada and the U.S. rank both his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and Philosophical Investigations among the top five most important books in twentieth-century philosophy, the latter standing out as "...the one crossover masterpiece in twentieth-century philosophy, appealing across diverse specializations and philosophical orientations". Wittgenstein's influence has been felt in nearly every field of the humanities and social sciences, yet there are widely diverging interpretations of his thought.
This book was read for an independent study with the Jesuit philosopher Dr. William Ellos, for whom I served as a teaching assistant at Loyola University Chicago.
Es un autor ya clásico, pero son escritos más bien tentativos. Muchas de las cosas más interesantes aparecen ya en la segunda sección de las Investigaciones Filosóficas. Este libro reviste interés puramente histórico o documental - lo que no quita que tenga páginas hermosas y/o desestabilizantes.
Eso si, la traducción no es buena. Hay muchas imprecisiones importantes, notas que oscurecen más que aclaran y muchos errores tipográficos.