The question I asked myself after finishing Rod Usher’s novel Florid States: how can such a dark story shine so much light on the human heart?
Usher’s novel carries us from the pit of florid psychosis to the battlements of star-crossed love. It finds a niche far above the mediocre prose that litters commercial bookshelves today. How has this book hidden itself from me for so long? Where were these characters while I struggled through my own real-life relationships and found that loving a complicated man is a learned skill, not an instinctive ability?
No one I know is schizophrenic. But experience with the disorder is not required to understand the heart of this novel’s conflict. Usher plumbs the depths of chemical psychosis just far enough to illuminate them, like a cavern guide shining a torch into a darkened chamber for the benefit of sightseers. His voice resonates with authenticity—this is one instance I hope an author is not writing from a place he knows, but if he isn’t, Usher’s prose does a fine job of convincing us otherwise.
From page one, Usher set us up to expect the worst. As narrators, Ned Quinn and Jennifer Duncan are as reliable as they can be under the circumstances. They both speak of foreboding: “[They] paid unconscious heed to fallen feathers, to the shapes of clouds, to the sudden cracking of dead wood. . .[e]ach quietly recorded dissonances and harmonies.”
A reader will quickly come to trust narrator insights and get caught up in the relentless psychological tension that drives each turn of the page. Ironies are subtle, never on the nose. For example, the same character who betrays Jennifer with small-minded prejudice falls straightaway into her own florid state—cause and effect, tit for tat. Yet this literacy device is beautifully executed; only in hindsight do we see the seamless framework Rod Usher built into the story.
For those who love to experience unfamiliar worlds--if only in their imagination—the Australian bush is as new and different as it gets for most of us. Rarely is a literary setting more vivid than Jennifer Duncan’s home on the Condamine. The river itself becomes a character in the novel, assigned its own personality and purpose. Usher doesn’t get caught up in descriptions by rote; he shares instead the effect each detail has on the story and characters, which creates a natural spillover for the reader. Each detail contributes to the atmosphere, never once making it seem that description was added because formula requires it.
This novel reminds me of The Thorn Birds, and maybe a little of The Notebook. Yet each of those novels has weaknesses unique to them which Florid States does not share. It’s a love story with teeth, an epic with timeless appeal. Most of all, it’s a darn good novel, one I recommend for any reader tired of predictable prose and paint-by-numbers storytelling.