Took quite long to read, despite it not being a long book. The text may be a bit dense, but it’s worth reading through. Personally, gave me many good insights and comfort as an relatively inexperienced teacher student.
”Common definitions of ”good” teaching often leave little, if any, room for the moments in education when confronting one’s own resistances to disruptive knowledge can be traumatic. In fact, ”good” teaching often means that crisis is averted, that lessons are doable and comfortable, that problems are solved, that learning results in feeling better, that knowledge is a good thing. … Yet, if anti-oppressive teaching requires disrupting the repetition of comforting knowledges, then students will always need to confront what they desire not to confront. And since learning what we desire not to learn —- can be an upsetting process, crisis should be expected in the process of learning, by both the student and the teacher.” (Kumashiro, 2009, p. 55)