it's really hard to read this and not think of valencia. crazy gay girls running around getting their hearts broken, drugs, sex workers, san francisco, etc, etc. and i keep going back to valencia in my head and trying to see what i loved there that's not here. i think maybe it's the flow, and the purpose. valencia is possibly just as meandering a book, but seems much more cohesive and smooth. but i'm already a michelle tea fan. and michelle tea is a lynn breedlove fan, or so says my back cover. so am i, therefore, a lynn breedlove fan?
i think the pace of the first few pages are unsustainable through the book, the narration of a bike messenger on speed definitely sets a very specific stage, but just as anyone on any drug gets intensely annoying after a while (unless you're possibly on drugs as well), the character got annoying, then the book got to this weird state of tedious annoy-ment, where i'd read it half-asleep waiting for what would hopefully be a change of pace. which, thankfully, came a few times, and was welcome every time. but still. i feel like, if you've read one drug book, you've kind of read them all (ditto mental institutions). acid trips, by their sheer definition, never make sense and sort of blend together (though i do have a particular favorite in another book). later events took on the characteristics of an acid trip, which made everything a little... hazy, especially when the supposed jackpot revelatory moment was supposed to be coming up.
my other beef is that everything that i would have gotten out of this book i've gotten better from another source, which is unfortunate, because it makes me think i'm reading this out of order, and had i read it when it was published, it would have been that closer to the time period it's set it, and the world would have looked more similar. more shootouts in the east village instead of condos. though maybe not, because it shouldn't matter how much time is between a book existing and the time period being written about, right?