2.5 stars, rounded up to 3. I really wanted to love this. I thought I would love this. I'd say I liked it, in the same way I like a lot of the teachings of Christianity. I can like something and still dislike aspects of it. To me this was a solid 50/50.
The Good:
-This book starts off very promising. We have some simply presented, factual information about ancient Mother Goddesses and Mary that I'd not heard of despite being fascinated by the concept for about 6 years (and arguably longer if you count my attempts to find the Divine Feminine within Christianity and my obsession with Mother Goddesses as a very young girl).
- The authors bare their souls and speak of trial and tribulation, as well as healing and hope through their relationship with Mother Earth. I did feel like I had a picture of their lives and what kind of people they were. It was very vulnerable which can't have been easy to put out in to the world.
- While I have some disagreements with it (which I'll get in to later), I appreciated the no-holds-barred, unapologetic approach to climate change, ecofeminism, what have you. Despite not agreeing with some of it, I'm always glad to see people unafraid to state that there's a sickness in our culture (though I have slight disagreements about what that sickness actually is). Furthermore, I also appreciated that the authors take a somewhat traditionalist approach (although they probably wouldn't view it that way) that 'progress' and 'science' aren't always the beacon of hope we think they are (but they're also forces of good sometimes- there is a lot of nuance). More and more these days I'm finding myself frustrated with proposed 'solutions' to climate change which basically amount to caking more and more makeup on to a person's face to hide their blemishes. It's all artificial.
- The beautiful reminders that we are always held, supported and cared for by our Mother and our Ancestors (and indeed the places where they overlap). We need only listen for their voices. God is real and we only need to look for signs of Her in nature. Miracles are real. We have nought to fear.
- Last but certainly not least, I'm glad that more and more people are waking up to the truth many have held in their hearts for, well, probably as old as Marian veneration itself: Mary is the Goddess. She is God Herself. She is the Divine Feminine. Many of the ancient Goddesses we once worshipped have all but vanished from our consciousness, but Mary hasn't. Most people are at least familiar with her even if they aren't Catholic. The East has Tara, Guanyin, Kali and Durga. The West has Mary. When Catholic Christianity gained the spiritual monopoly in Europe, Mary, for all intents and purposes, became the Goddess- that is, not one individual goddess, but God Herself. This book is helping more and more people realise this truth for themselves (and surely many of them have always known it to be true and were just waiting for permission to profess it). I've seen the community they've built and it's genuinely so beautiful to me that so many people, even ones who don't consider themselves religious in any way, Just Love Mary. To me, that's no different than hearing someone proclaim they just love the Goddess.
The Bad:
- There is a fair bit of hypocrisy here in many ways. The first of which: the authors claim to be anti-religion, and that they're not trying to start a new one. They demonize anyone who considers spirituality to be their vocation (including pagan priestesses) and yet they have a community in which they are undoubtedly the leaders of. Their words are taken as gospel. Literally- the author calls his personal experiences with the Divine a 'Gospel' and other people follow it. How is that not indicative of a religion? Just because it's earth focused and not heaven focused doesn't make it not a religion. I'd have much less of a problem with this if they could admit that's what it was. It brings me the same sort of feelings I get when Christians tell me Christianity isn't a religion: "it's a relationship", or when new agers use Eastern religious practices and claim they're not religious. I don't know if it's fair to mention this as it isn't directly related to the book, but a couple of weeks ago I attended an online rosary circle in which the monthly 'Words of Our Lady' were read aloud and discussed. When I inquired where they came from, I was told "Clarke. He receives the apparitions." To be honest, that gave me chills. I don't see that as much different than the Mormon church claiming it still receives direct revelation from God, and yet they claim to be against any sort of priest, prophet or preacher. What would happen if I or anyone else came to one of the meetings with a message from Our Lady that contradicted that of Clarke's? Would we be booted? I'd be more comfortable with this if it weren't for the (ironically) 'holier-than-thou', judgemental attitudes towards any sort of clergy or religion that isn't theirs. Only 'spiritual but not religious' pantheism is valid, any other way of experiencing the Divine is flawed and wrong. Shortly after that, I mentioned Glastonbury Goddess Temple to one of the authors, who promptly told me the whole concept of having temples and priestesses devoted to the Goddess was patriarchal abuse. Given that this 'movement' is led by one man's monthly UPG (Unique Personal Gnosis, a term in pagan circles to describe personal revelation), I find that quite ironic. These priestesses aren't participating in patriarchal abuse by teaching goddess lore and holding goddess ceremonies any more than this well-meaning gentleman is by sharing his personal spiritual writings with the world.
- Hypocrisy #2: This book expresses in no shortage of words the idea that we're all born with the stain of original sin/the Fall, and that the fall is... Agriculture. Agriculture and civilization are constantly demonized throughout the book as The Root of All Evil, and 'Our Lady' continually chastises humanity as a whole, when a handful of corporations are directly responsible for what's happening to our planet. Every day people aren't to blame for the impending climate collapse, it's capitalism, it's greed. Farming isn't Original Sin. Electricity isn't inherently evil. Electricity was used to print the book, for them to hold their online rosary meetings. You can't downright demonize something and then happily partake in it. If these people lived like true hunter gatherers then this book would never exist. The things like "Our Lady is calling for a rapidly decreasing population" was genuinely bizarre to me because how exactly do you propose that happen? Do you want us to kill people off like true ecofascists? Do you think everyone in your 'movement' who strives to have children despite impending climate catastrophe is a sinner?
- This sort of ties back in to my first 'bad' point, but because the author claims to have received all these messages from God Herself, there's the underlying message of "You're not allowed to disagree with this, because you're disagreeing with God Herself". Personal revelation is something I very much believe in, but when it's shared with others, it should NEVER be something that others are guilt tripped in to believing, that gives way to spiritual abuse and ultimately, cults. I wanted to avoid the word but given everything I've said I do see potential for this with this 'movement'. The fact that they claim to not be a religion doesn't preclude them from cult-like red flags. Many new age, hippie cults over the past few decades had similar claims of 'circles of friendship', 'we're not a religion', etc. I don't believe that the authors have any malicious intent but I don't believe most cult leaders did to begin with. It's something that builds slowly, over time.
- This is a very minor gripe as I can't really blame the authors of this particular book for this one, seeing as it's so prominent in Goddess worship circles (largely thanks to the influence of Wicca in the 70s and 80s): It's annoying to me to claim Mary as this wide-ruling Mother Goddess, and then put Her in this box of 'Earth Mother' when Her title, and the title of many of the most ancient faces of the Mother in the Middle East and surrounding areas, was 'Queen of Heaven', and to put Her in this dichotomy with a male Sky God. I understand them wanting 'balance' between masculine and feminine, but making the earth the domain of the feminine and the Heavens the domain of the masculine has some really sexist connotations and ultimately keeps the Lady in an inferior position as Mediatrix to Her husband. (EDIT: Leaving this up but I no longer agree with myself here after embracing a more earth based path myself. I realised the only reason you'd really think this is if you view the earth as passive and unimportant, but not if it's actively, powerful and necessary for our survival. So I redact this part for the most part, although I still think it's important we recognise that the Goddess is more than just an Earth Mother in Her totality.)
So yes. I wouldn't advise anyone not to read this book. There's certainly a lot of wisdom here, but also a not insignificant amount of what borders on Malthusian ecofascism, and hypocrisy. Tread carefully. I passionately agree with and resonate with plenty in this book, but an equal amount genuinely really doesn't sit right with me at all. But everyone's opinion will vary. Clearly this book has touched a lot of people's hearts for a reason and if anything I think it gets conversations going. And I am greatly appreciative for the work the authors are doing to help prove to the world that the Queen of Heaven isn't bound to Catholicism.