Albert Poland’s Stages: a Theater Memoir paints a compelling portrait of a kid from Indiana who went on to become one of the most successful managing directors and/or producers in New York theater history. His career spanned decades. He was a champion for off-Broadway, and yet his reputation was such that he also worked on iconic Broadway shows. His book, largely about dollars and cents, offers insights into stars like Uta Hagen, Eileen Heckert, Vanessa Redgrave, Frank Langella, and Hugh Jackman, among many others. Enlightening are the battles he fought and won with agents, producers, directors, and actors in his quest to produce successful shows. The book is a treasure trove of theater history. And anyone who is inclined to dismiss the idea that theater is fueled by gays and lesbians can read this book and dismiss no further. I, a gay man and professional theater person, was taken aback at all the people Poland tells about who are or were gay. I knew many, others I didn’t know, and others were those whose names I was just now encountering. It was an eye-opener. Poland writes with a breezy style, and although his job in many cases was to deal with the money, he tells so much about what makes theater theater that we forgive the endless money talks and enjoy the theater narrative. My only complaint is the editing. Poland often eschews the accepted way of writing dialogue—“each time a new speaker speaks, a paragraph begins”—and runs speeches together into single paragraphs, which makes for confusion at times. But I have a theory about that. And I stress it is just a theory, a speculation. Nowhere on the book could I find the name of a publisher. No editor is listed, but in the acknowledgments, Poland thanks a cousin for his editing skills. I believe this book, for whatever reason (I propose so Poland could reap the most money from it because, after all, he is a money man) the book was self-published. And as I counted the number of pages from beginning to end, I counted an exact four hundred pages. Could it be that Poland chose to forego traditional dialogue spacing in order to make his book fit in those four hundred pages? After all, adding pages might run the purchase price up, or more importantly, cut into Poland’s profits. But I can’t prove this, and I stress it is probably just my addled brain looking for a reason why an editor wouldn’t have nixed this practice. Whatever. I highly recommend this book to all and sundry who have interest in the theater. Poland offers insights almost greater than any theater history I’ve ever read, for his insights are very personal indeed.