foundational work for my (hopefully) future studies, so of course i respect it, but i found the writing style pretty repetitive and unclear. the amount of foucalt quotations is frightening
also, miss girl bases a lot of her theory on macgregor, and while i get it, because he was indeed my childhood hero, i'm now reading brutish museums and his stance on repatrations and even more so iraq is ummm.. yeah. i mean, i know this book only began the discourse, but since i've been consuming a lot of museum studies oriented media and decolonisation media, it feels off to read a book on formation of knowledge in museums without a single mention of looting