This reader has mixed feelings about this novel.
The idea of a school, which teaches about sex in a nonjudgmental way, is great. That this "school" is divided into classes of like Basic Intercourse, etc. even better (in fact, the section of the novel in which Jessica and her instructor pair off during Basic Intercourse was well written and could be used as a manual for (first?) lovemaking).
On the other hand, it seems like some of the novel's sections on various sexual positions and types of sex are written by a whole other person. Passages seem somewhat crude as if written from a man's point of view. This reader has read enough erotica (The Story of O, Anne Rampling's Beauty series, Tiffany Reisz's Original Sinners, etc.) over the years and if written by a woman tends to be erotic without crudeness.
Yet, there was once a book this reader happened to find and read, which was written by a man and it was frankly crude and vulgar in the descriptions of the sex act(s). If the passages were written in the sections from either Chris's or Justin's perspectives, this reader would have understood, but from Jessica's perspective?? Yet, time and time again as the novel continued, Jessica's feelings and emotions seemed like they changed to a more "male" (Yes, this sounds sexist, and it is.) language.
While the story was basically light-hearted about the racy sexual adventures of Jessica and her two "special to her" instructors introducing her to all the sexual acts she wanted to explore during her two weeks at the school, this flipping back and forth between sweetness and bawdiness was disconcerting at times.
Yes, there were many fun things about this story, and now there are several sequels to follow up what happens next to the trio. Will Jessica pick Chris or Justin exclusively, or will they continue to share her sexually, making their relationship a menage a trois?
Be forewarned, it is full of sexual scenes of all kinds, very spicy scenes with the language to go with it.
Lots of typos (misused words and/or extraneous words based on context) which could easily have been avoided with another set of eyes or another re-read by the author. Too many What-the-tuck trends (lots of winks, tucking, etc.), but that may be just this reader's issue.