An entertaining and painfully accurate account of a year in the life of a primary school teacher, interspersed with the author's views on education. She'd potter along for a bit documenting the funny, chaotic, never-a-dull-moment highs and lows of her day, then dive off into a passionate rant about how schools are becoming increasingly consumer-driven and focused on performance & comparison, and how toxic this culture is for kids and their learning. I really enjoyed reading it! She has an engaging writing style and spoke frankly and controversially about lots of topics that I'm interested in and have strong opinions about, so it was a gripping read for me.
It's titled "Dear Parents", but if she was hoping to get parents on her side, or make them feel more sympathetic toward teachers, I think she needed to tone it down a notch. Her frustration and lack of respect for parents came through a bit TOO clearly! It's understandable that she feels bitter after all the bad experiences she described, in which she was treated dreadfully by parents, not given any support by the school, and made to feel powerless and unsafe, meanwhile witnessing the negative impact their behaviour was having on the children. The injustice has plainly rankled, especially considering how genuinely she cares about the kids. She made lots of valid points, but it was a little one-sided. Not ALL Parents, Gabbie! Many of them are amazing - doing an excellent job of raising their kids, incredibly supportive of schools and teachers, volunteering their own time, bending over backwards to help. But nope, she wasn't having that! Went out of her way to stress that even the nicest parents CANNOT be trusted not to turn around and stab teachers in the back when things go wrong! It's a shame because instead of feeling more sympathetic, I think lots of parents would come away from this book feeling defensive and "us-vs-them", which is hardly going to help. It's meant to be a partnership! Teachers and parents have the same goal in mind and should be working together to help kids learn, not bickering about whose fault it is when they don't.
The book did demonstrate, to some extent, why teachers never seem to have enough time. By all accounts, people are leaving the profession in droves because the workload is unmanageable, but they're often mocked for complaining about it. "You get ten weeks of holidays a year! You finish work at 3.20 every day!" Theoretically, it seems like there should be plenty of time to get everything done, but in practice, apparently, there isn't. Why not? Unless you've worked as a teacher yourself, it's difficult to see where the disparity lies. So when she listed and described each item of her day, including the many 'unofficial/off the clock' tasks, you could begin to get a glimpse into the time vortex that is teaching.
She was clearly a very good teacher so it's sad that she got to the point where she felt she couldn't do it anymore. She claimed it wasn't just a problem of bad leadership, but I think it could have made all the difference for her in many of the situations she described. To me it seemed like at the heart of her unhappiness with teaching was not just lack of time but lack of freedom. She didn't get to CHOOSE how to use her time. She was bubbling over with amazing ideas, drawing on her professional training and years of experience, things that she believed in and was passionate about and could tailor to the individuals in her class. But she'd frequently get told, sorry, no, leadership has decided that THIS should be your priority. And quite often 'this' would be something she considered pointless at best, at worst actively harmful (e.g. Naplan), which left her feeling incredibly frustrated and undervalued. This must have been a very cathartic book for her to write, and I totally get it. Any job where you have to keep smiling and nodding and being professional while people are being rude, unreasonable, and dismissive of your expertise would start to drive you a bit mental. Especially for someone like the author, who is clearly very sensitive and emotional and cares a bit too much.
One thing she talked about a fair bit, which I do agree with, is the wildly different expectations that parents have about schools and teachers. What a teacher's role is, what they should and shouldn't teach, or do, or say, is often completely different depending on who you ask. There's a huge spectrum, ranging from "how dare you tell my child not to stay up all night watching TV, it's none of your business what they do at home!" To: "when you get a minute please sort out my kid's social life, find all their lost belongings, remind them to go to the toilet, apply sunscreen, oh and also could you cure them of their online game addiction? Thaaanks!" Some evidently think they could do a far better job than you, others are one step away from handing their kids over and saying "here, you raise them." (Then, moments later, "oh, but not like THAT!") Often they somehow manage to do both at the same time. In theory there should be a clearly defined line between 'teacher's responsibility' and 'parent's responsibility', but in real life there often isn't. School life and home life are linked and affect each other. Parents sometimes end up explaining multiplication, mitochondria, and metaphors to their kids, and teachers sometimes end up explaining personal hygiene, internet safety, healthy eating, social behaviour, ethics, drugs and alcohol, taxes, racism, sex ed, car maintenance, and other 'life skills'. And sure, maybe school is the right place to teach some or all of those things. But (as Gabbie kept pointing out) it's hard to squeeze more stuff in without taking other things out, and the curriculum is chronically overcrowded as it is. The list of stuff that Now Must Also Be Covered keeps getting longer when there's already not enough time in the day to even scratch the surface of the topics listed. "What schools should/shouldn't teach" is something everyone seems to have an opinion about, but WHO actually gets to decide? Not teachers! They're not even consulted.
Anyway, my final complaint was that the whole premise was flawed. The idea that she was *actually sending* these emails to parents griping about everything they were doing wrong, and they didn't mind, responded positively, and didn't tell the principal or anyone else, was laughably naive. Not one of those fictional parents came forward about her emails at the P&f meeting or spoke up about it on Facebook. It was unrealistic and it undermined her point because it would be such an incredibly unprofessional and unethical thing for a teacher to do. Criticising parents and other teachers by name, describing students' behaviour and personalities, discussing details of their learning abilities and home life situations with the parents of the entire class! In an EMAIL, so it could be forwarded on, shared around, posted online, analysed by every random on the internet, with her name & the school's name attached! I felt panicked at the very idea. I understand why she wanted to frame it that way from a narrative point of view, but think it should have been done differently, presented as a teacher's deleted/draft emails or something else like that.
EDITED TO ADD: I just read some of the other reviews and now I want to say one more thing, even though at this point my review is practically its own book. I feel like a lot of reviewers saw this book as a big long rant about the evils of NAPLAN, but I think that's missing the point. NAPLAN is just an example of her underlying concern about the entire culture around education - what people think education is FOR, what they believe they should be able to expect from it. For a lot of people, that seems to be: nice, tidy, measurable statistics that can be plotted on a graph and compared. Like learning is that simple. Pour exactly 2.5ml of information in, then measure each child to check it has all been absorbed - done! Naplan data has some practical uses for teachers, but it shouldn't be used or applied the way it often is - to compare individual kids and their learning, and to make judgements about the school or the teacher's ability to teach. Which is exactly as silly and pointless as plotting a graph of how quickly babies learn to walk and using that information to draw conclusions about them as individuals and whether their parents are any good at parenting. Education is (or it should be) more than a competition over how well kids do in a test.