What do you think?
Rate this book
How to Be a Diplomacy Player: A Philosophy of Face to Face Diplomacy
You've been invited to play Diplomacy. Lucky you.
Diplomacy is one of those rare games that is a perennial favorite among a certain class of social, strategic, competitive, negotiations-based.
How you've managed to avoid an invitation for so long may or may not be your fault. The world has gone a bit soft of late.
Amazingly, 65 years after its invention by Allan B. Calhamer, it has a prominent place in the hobby gaming landscape, from recreational to competitive play. From it's face-to-face roots to postal heyday to online play and back again to face-to-face, Diplomacy has shown incredible staying power.
Of these vibrant roots I was unaware on my first contact with the game.
I was introduced to the game at Cypress Creek High School in Houston, Texas by my history teacher, Bill Self.
Though they did not know each other, game designer Larry Harris concurs with Mr. Self's decision to bring the game into the
I am convinced that Allan Calhamer's masterpiece should be part of every high school curriculum. Don't tell the kids, but it teaches history, geography, the art of political negotiation, and something else, some healthy critical skepticism. By the time you get into high school, you have a pretty good idea that not everyone always tells the truth. But a good game of Diplomacy helps you to understand how skillful some people can be at fooling you!
In my first game of Diplomacy, I drew England.
It was a fall afternoon in 2003. The previous week, Mr. Self had asked for volunteers to play a game which he described "It's a beautiful game."
His intention was to teach some of us the game so that the quality of the forthcoming in-class game (for a grade!) would be of a higher standard. Smart man. (I highly valued this demo game, and describe in the chapter on Exploration how to involve new players in them.)
In this practice game as England, I quickly learned the advantages of fleets, how to prepare a successful convoy, and even took Saint Petersburg in 1902 from a distracted Russian.
That afternoon I was hooked. When I arrived home, I promptly ordered my copy, Avalon Hill's 4th edition from the year 2000, a quality board I still own and occasionally use (even though I prefer playing with wooden pieces).
Leading up to the in-class game in Houston, I invited friends over on weekends to play. Mom made us cookies as well as healthy snacks to keep our energy levels high enough to sustain long, intense afternoons of strategic negotiation.
By the time of the in-class game, many of us were ready.
We understood the inherent Inequality (Chapter 2) of the game, its delightful imbalances and the diplomatic nuances stemming from these dynamics and potential.
Having experienced growth, decline, victory, and defeat, we gained an understanding of Psychology (Chapter 3). Now we had psychological strategies to deploy on ourselves and tools with which to engage our opponents and predict their behavior.
Morality (Chapter 4), too, you might be surprised to hear, had a place in the notoriously treacherous hobby.
It wasn't until recently, having read an article on non-routine problems and revisiting a book on the philosophy of poker that I began thinking about developing a Philosophy of Diplomacy (Chapter 1). My earliest musings will be shared, hopefully to be expanded in further writings.
Of course, our group of young Diplomacy players also planted seeds in the gardens of Negotiation (Chapter 5), Strategy (Chapter 6), and Exploration (Chapter 7).
I went on to win the in-class game as Germany opening with the Skagerrak Sentry, whose move order is equivalent to the Jutland Gambit, but which varies diplomatically in the sense that Germany and France are already planning to carve up England. An elaboration is given in the chapter on Strategy.
Soon after, I started a Diplomacy Club within the high school, and never looked back.
Diplomacy is one of those rare games that is a perennial favorite among a certain class of social, strategic, competitive, negotiations-based.
How you've managed to avoid an invitation for so long may or may not be your fault. The world has gone a bit soft of late.
Amazingly, 65 years after its invention by Allan B. Calhamer, it has a prominent place in the hobby gaming landscape, from recreational to competitive play. From it's face-to-face roots to postal heyday to online play and back again to face-to-face, Diplomacy has shown incredible staying power.
Of these vibrant roots I was unaware on my first contact with the game.
I was introduced to the game at Cypress Creek High School in Houston, Texas by my history teacher, Bill Self.
Though they did not know each other, game designer Larry Harris concurs with Mr. Self's decision to bring the game into the
I am convinced that Allan Calhamer's masterpiece should be part of every high school curriculum. Don't tell the kids, but it teaches history, geography, the art of political negotiation, and something else, some healthy critical skepticism. By the time you get into high school, you have a pretty good idea that not everyone always tells the truth. But a good game of Diplomacy helps you to understand how skillful some people can be at fooling you!
In my first game of Diplomacy, I drew England.
It was a fall afternoon in 2003. The previous week, Mr. Self had asked for volunteers to play a game which he described "It's a beautiful game."
His intention was to teach some of us the game so that the quality of the forthcoming in-class game (for a grade!) would be of a higher standard. Smart man. (I highly valued this demo game, and describe in the chapter on Exploration how to involve new players in them.)
In this practice game as England, I quickly learned the advantages of fleets, how to prepare a successful convoy, and even took Saint Petersburg in 1902 from a distracted Russian.
That afternoon I was hooked. When I arrived home, I promptly ordered my copy, Avalon Hill's 4th edition from the year 2000, a quality board I still own and occasionally use (even though I prefer playing with wooden pieces).
Leading up to the in-class game in Houston, I invited friends over on weekends to play. Mom made us cookies as well as healthy snacks to keep our energy levels high enough to sustain long, intense afternoons of strategic negotiation.
By the time of the in-class game, many of us were ready.
We understood the inherent Inequality (Chapter 2) of the game, its delightful imbalances and the diplomatic nuances stemming from these dynamics and potential.
Having experienced growth, decline, victory, and defeat, we gained an understanding of Psychology (Chapter 3). Now we had psychological strategies to deploy on ourselves and tools with which to engage our opponents and predict their behavior.
Morality (Chapter 4), too, you might be surprised to hear, had a place in the notoriously treacherous hobby.
It wasn't until recently, having read an article on non-routine problems and revisiting a book on the philosophy of poker that I began thinking about developing a Philosophy of Diplomacy (Chapter 1). My earliest musings will be shared, hopefully to be expanded in further writings.
Of course, our group of young Diplomacy players also planted seeds in the gardens of Negotiation (Chapter 5), Strategy (Chapter 6), and Exploration (Chapter 7).
I went on to win the in-class game as Germany opening with the Skagerrak Sentry, whose move order is equivalent to the Jutland Gambit, but which varies diplomatically in the sense that Germany and France are already planning to carve up England. An elaboration is given in the chapter on Strategy.
Soon after, I started a Diplomacy Club within the high school, and never looked back.
142 pages, Kindle Edition
Published March 15, 2019
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
No one has reviewed this book yet.