Tim Hanley walks us through an in depth history of the Archie Comics characters' Betty and Veronica and how their depictions were a reflection of the current mores of society filtered through the conservative voice of the mostly male writers and publishers.
Early in their career Betty and Veronica could be seen as feminist trail blazers. Hanley takes care to emphasize that this depiction was not one of political sensibility, but of what worked best for the stories. Hey, sometimes the end result is more important than how you got there.
By giving a thorough examination of Betty and Veronica's history Hanley also gave us one of Archie Comics. And, this lets us know exactly how important Archie Comics was throughout comic book history. It seems like in every event in comics history there was an Archie comics reaction, or Archie Comics was a part of the cause. That was pretty mind blowing to see! I did know that John Goldwater was a big part of the Comics Code Authority that popped up when people were afraid that comic books were turning kids into juvenile delinquents. I did not know he was also a major factor in it's liberalization in the '70s. He was in charge of the Code when the famous Spider-man drug addiction story published without the CCA seal of approval. Anecdotes like this put the book into a real world context and place the books, and the characters.
Speaking of the real world. Hanley did an excellent job of contrasting and comparing the duo's depictions with what was going on in the real world. From Bobby Soxer to Women's liberation, to ? What would today's depiction be called? The zeitgeist of the real world was depicted by these characters. Of course, this depiction was through these conservative eyes, so the full picture might not come out. But, enough of one that it could be seen. And, Hanley was able to use snippets of dialog and scene descriptions to show what was happening in the books, and compare/contrast this against the real world.
If I had a complaint about the book it is that in some places I wanted even more information -even if that information had nothing to do with the subjects of the book! For instance, the history of Spire Comics is a fascinating one that I had never heard of. Al Hartley was writing for Archie Comics and at first injected his Christianity into regular Archie stories. Later, he was able to convince the publisher the use of the characters in Spire Comics, a religious comic book company. Now, when I was a kid I had a bunch of these. I was excited at first. But, then they got all churchy and I felt ripped off. Later, it came to me that I had those and wondered what the deal was. Now I know! But, I'd have loved to have found out more. Like, did that affect sales of regular Archie? What ended the relationship? Was there ever Spire comic issue featuring Sabrina?
I'm a pretty big fan of Archie Comics. I enjoyed the Mard Waid reboot (especially for the new amazing artists, but also for the historical comics each book would feature.) And, I read as a kid, and as an adult. But, I avoided the TV show Riverdale like the plague. Specifically for one relationship that was shown in the pilot. I thought it was gross, and I didn't need to watch a show that would glamorize something like that. Turns out, the show was on my side on this. And, sure it took this book spoiling every major event of the show (Thanks, Hanley. Ever hear of spoiler warnings?!) but now I really want to watch it. Netflix here I come.
This was a fun informative read. If you have any interest in comic book history, I think this would make for an interesting read.
I got this for free from NetGalley. But, that didn't affect my feelings on the book.