Dame Agatha Christie and Her Peers
BOOK 7
I read a P.D.James book years ago, and instead of finding a "Christie-Cozy" relaxing read, I found it to be overly challenging and confusing at times: I had to focus a bit more while reading James than other 'who-did-it' type authors. So, I'm going to give James another try, starting with this, the first in the Dalgiesh series.
CAST=3 stars: Here, Detective Chief Inspector Adam Dalgiesh feels rather flat, but at a first outing, no author wants to give too much away about a series P.I./detective. Mrs. Eleanor Maxie had given a dinner party about 3 months previous to the current time-line in this book. Something happened, we aren't told what. Dr. Charles Epps, Vicar Bernard Hinks, Miss Liddel (warden of St. Mary's Refuge for Girls), Catherine Bowers (an amicable nurse), and Dr. Stephen Maxie were at that party, and it appears Bowers and Maxie had been 'involved." Others had attended that previous party, but here is where things get tricky: some characters in the current time-line/party didn't attend the last one, like Miss Pollock who is 2nd in charge at St. Mary's. I liked that in the edition I read (and this might be true of all editions), a list of characters were provided up front. (The edition of "War and Peace" I read had a nice, thick bookmark with all the main characters and their various names printed on that bookmark, front and back. Great idea, I'd like to see more of that in books with large casts.) Back to "Cover Her Face", I thought the cast solid but no one really stood out. (Well, other than the person who may or may not have been standing on a ladder...sorry, bad pun, couldn't help it.)
ATMOSPHERE/PLACE - 2 stars: The Martingale house might be fabulous, might be falling apart, we just don't know. There is a church function. One character's bedroom is initially described as a big, functional nursery with no personal belongings. Later, when Dalgiesh questions the character, we learn there had been figurines on a windowsill which are now broken. Did James realize only late in the book she needed decorative figurines to be broken to advance the plot. Or was the room decorated by the inhabitant as the novel progressed? It's impossible (well, for me) to tell. Given this novel is James first in the series, I did get the impression she was feeling her way through: thus my 2-star rating for this element.
PLOT/CRIME - 4 stars: During the current time-line/house party, "X" is strangled. That's rather common, but James does add a locked-room mystery to the murder, so I'm adding a star for a 4-star plot/crime element. In addition, the author opens the novel with what is either a great red herring or a big clue to the solution itself: "Exactly 3 months before the killing at Martingale, Mrs. Maxie gave a dinner party....[She'd] looked back on that spring evening as the opening scene of tragedy." You decide: are the clues in the past, or in the present? And of those people who attended or did not attend that party, which of them might be the killer in the current time-line. Great potential here for a mind-stretching exercise!
INVESTIGATION - 2 stars. Dagliesh has his work cut out for him. He must interview a lot of people, then re-interview them. He digs deep. But here is my problem: I have eleven (yes, 11) pages of notes and questions. Like a list of people who arrived Friday evening for the weekend party just before dinner, then who arrived later Friday night, then the arrivals on Saturday morning. For the Friday dinner, for example, Dagliesh knows Dr. Maxie had arrived late but Catherine (his romantic love interest?) had arrived early. Sunday morning, someone has a headache and takes what appears to be aspirin, but is Sommeil. I could go on and on. Is the need for 11 pages of notes indicative of a good mystery, or does that mean James didn't really have a specific goal? I'll go with the latter explanation in this case.
SOLUTION - 1 star: A spectacular failure. James commits the ultimate 'sin' in the world of murder mysteries: she introduces a new character at almost the end of the book. Things change so dramatically and quickly that the first 2/3rds of the book (and 10 pages of my notes) were rendered pointless.
SUMMARY: 2.4. P.D. James goes for 'big' here and even though the author does explain the central crime (mostly), withholding final clues is just irritating. And some of my written questions in my notes weren't answered, like, "Felix Hearne, a current suspect. was NOT at the previous party 3 months ago. IF the tragedy had truly began 3 months ago (as James suggested in the opening of the novel) and thus the murder plans had started 3 months ago, when did Felix become involved?" Or, "On page 87, what did Mrs. Maxie ask her son when he called the cops after the crime had been committed?" As I said, I remembered James as being challenging. I remembered correctly. And this may have been the book I read! I'm going to read more of James and take a different approach: maybe I should just forego taking notes. (But I so like to figure 'who-did-it' and notes usually help.) While I do admire her 'big' goal, James' talent as represented here isn't within her grasp.