*What I like about the story is the third-person point of view. The story is told from the third person narrative (he, she, they.) The focus is on the different members of the Raysons' family. The parents are Tom and Marian. Their children are Curt and Alice. Other characters are included, but this story is about the Raysons. Reading a third-person narrative, I was able to take a seat and watch the story unfold. In this way of telling the story, Playground Zero doesn't tell or teach me to have an opinion other than the one in my mind. I can read the story and let it unfold, then create my own feeling and judgment.
*I like reading a story that's out of my normal type read. This broadens my mind at the least. Whether I will end up enjoying the book is another thing.
*The Raysons' family is an example of parents and children who are not connecting. Each person is focused on something other than each other. Each of them want to connect with something or someone whether it's another person or an event that will fill what's absent from their lives. In other words, each of the family members are searching for something that will bring meaning, stability, and intimacy. At times, the kids are looking to a parent for direction and guidance. They are looking for a stable and secure home, because the outside world is a scary place. Instead, the kids get zero help in the home. Is it possible that's why the title is Playground Zero?
Connection and intimacy are themes and conflicts running through the story.
*When Alice and Curt start school in Berkeley, California, school integration has begun. This is new for them. It's not new to have relationships with people of the African American race. It is new for African American and white children to be in the classroom together. Alice wants to be a friend no matter the person's race. However, her good intentions are not matched with other students who are comfortable and accepting. This is an additional conflict in her life. She has a hard time finding a connection whether it's at home, in school, or in the neighborhood.
Curt is a physical person. He's athletic. It helps that boys regardless of race play sports together.
*The way the two races of kids treat one another was interesting. I saw a curiosity, but an unwillingness and inability to know how to integrate with one another. This is another conflict in the story.
*One of the things I had trouble with in the book is Alice is ten (and she's twelve at the end) when the story begins. The story follows the family for a year. Her person seems older-a teenager and not a kid of ten. I had a difficult time believing that Alice is ten. If she'd been thirteen when the story began, then I'd state this story had a believable quality.
*I enjoyed the east coast versus west coast differences. The family began in Washington D.C. and relocated across the country to Berkeley, California.
*I laughed at the adults in the story who complain about people who judge others when they too judge.
*Tom and Marian have strong ideas of what they want their kids to experience. However, being strong stable parents is not one of those ideas.
*I experienced through Alice's eyes the demonstrations, riots, and the chaos that transpired.
*The story doesn't focus much on Curt. I wanted to hear more about his life.
*Lastly, there is a closure for the family. A big change comes and the kids are thrust to a new place. Alice has experienced big changes in the year at Berkeley, California. Her person grew in age one year, but in experience probably 30 years. Of course, I'd like to know the rest of her story!
*Final thoughts:
This is not a story that is a "feel good" story. It is a book that is revealing about people. There were moments when I was infuriated at the parents. I had moments of deep sadness for Alice. It is a book I'll not forget. This is the last point and the main reason that led me to give this book an excellent rating: it is memorable!
Source: I received a complementary ARC paperback copy from the publisher, I was not required to write a positive review.