Tim O’Brien is one of my favorite writers. I've read everything he's written. While he's most famous for The Things They Carried, I'd put Going After Cacciato, In The Lake Of The Woods, and If I Die In A Combat Zone in the same league.
Tim O'Brien became a father for the first time when he was already in his late 50s. With his own mortality looming in the back of his mind as he watched his two sons grow up, he started writing them letters so that, as adults, they would have something of his to share, in his absence.
This book is a published collection of those letters. It’s a hodgepodge. Many chapters are only a page long, sharing quirky and funny things his sons have done or said. Others are full-length essays about war, his childhood, the vocation of storytelling, and his family.
Some parts are a tad sentimental, a besotted father gushing about his two boys. But everything is thoughtful, considered, and well-written, and the sentimentality feels fully earned. Some parts are bitter, reflections about the nature of warfare, the ways in which conflict is sanitized for public consumption. He writes about Ernest Hemingway a lot, about all the things he loves and hates about Hemingway’s stories.
Coincidentally, I read this book concurrently with Between The World And Me by Ta-Nahesi Coates. There are some parallels. Both are written in the form of a letter to the author’s son(s). Both grapple with an aspect of life that is toxic, difficult, and intractable. In the case of Ta-Nahesi Coates it’s race in American society: what it means to be black, how that will affect his son’s life, what racism is, and how we ought to respond to it. In the case of O’Brien, it’s war, the killing of other human beings, the fear of dying, the irreparable tragedy of armed conflict, the inevitable moral degradation, the lies and hypocrisy that war engenders.
In Dad’s Maybe Book, there were two chapters that stood out to me. One was a comparison of the United States in Vietnam to the British in the War of Independence. Both were a global superpower, fighting in a provincial backwater, against an enemy that resorted to guerrilla tactics, and that had home field advantage. Both the United States and the British, of course, lost. It’s a stunning piece of writing.
The other chapter that stood out to me, entitled "War Buddies," was an essay about O'Brien's relationship with his fellow veterans. How he genuinely loves the men he served with, despite their political differences. For O'Brien, the Vietnam War was a shameful episode, a ghastly blunder, a cautionary tale of hubris and arrogance that resulted in 3 million deaths. For most of his fellow Veterans, the meaning they derive from their service is about duty and honor, and they don't seem to worry much about whether the war was justified in the first place.
In various ways, to various degrees, virtually everything I’ve written over the past several pages will seriously irritate a large number of Vietnam veterans. A substantial majority, I’d guess. And beyond any doubt it will irritate one particular Vietnam veteran, a man who declared in a 2016 letter to the Austin American-Statesman: “For me, the war was never about right or wrong but duty and honoring my uniform.
Three million dead people.
Never about right or wrong.
Despite the jumbled, ad hoc quality of this book, I found it quite moving. His thoughts on war and writing always read as an ongoing struggle for honesty, for truth, for clarity, underscored with a deep humility, that the full truth can never be attained, that full honesty is impossible. But it seems that at the end of a turbulent life wrestling with the meaning of war and his role in it, O'Brien found contentment as a family man.
O'Brien is known for being a former soldier. I hope he is remembered as a loving father.
Here are some quotes:
“Watch out for absolutism . . . Be suspicious of slogans and platitudes and generalizations of any sort . . . seek the exceptions. Memorize the fallacy of composition. Remember that even mathematicians demand proofs. Raise your eyebrows when you hear the phrase “courage of conviction.” Remember that Adolf Hitler and the executioners at Salem had the courage of lunatic conviction.”
“You were born, Timmy, in a time of epidemic terror—airliners crashing into skyscrapers, anthrax arriving in the morning mail—and among the casualties of terror is our fragile tolerance for ambiguity and uncertainty and all that is unknown. . . . I realize, Timmy, that in the coming years you, too, like our country at the moment, will find yourself terrified—of love, of commitment, of madmen, of monsters in your closet, of me—and tonight I’m asking only that you remain human in your terror, that you preserve the gifts of decency and modesty, and that you do not permit arrogance to overwhelm the possibility that you may be wrong as often as you are right.”
“I want you to remember that truths can be contradictory. I could tell you, Timmy, that you live in a great and good country, and I would be telling the truth. But I could also tell you that ours is country that once permitted the enslavement of human beings, and that too would be true."
“A man is what he thinks about.”
“I may not always be available to offer advice, so I’ll offer it now: Pretend your life is a story. Then write a good one.”
“We will never run short of things to kill for. We will never run short of lies. We will never run short of dead-sure, beyond-a-doubt liars in public places . . . It is hopeless. But pretend it is not.”