The title of the book suggests some great stories about how information and books were collected and preserved during and just after the Second World War, but the book itself does not fulfill the promise of adventure inherent in the title. Yes, this book is about many efforts by U.S. personnel to rescue and preserve documents and books during and just after the Second World War--so many overlapping efforts that it was terribly disorganized at the time and would be terrible to try to organize into a coherent book (there was very little "banding together"). For the second part, about looted Jewish books and artifacts, the author manages pretty well. But the first part involves a lot of overlapping missions, including (1) efforts by American agents to recover and use for military intelligence various "open source" documents, like newspapers and journals being published in Europe during the war; (2) efforts by military "T-Squads" to get to abandoned German and other records as the front moved back toward Germany, before they could be destroyed, used for kindling, pulped, or looted; (3) efforts by a morass of American organizations, some official and some not, such as the Library of Congress Mission, the Hoover Institution's agents (representing a research library at Stanford University), the military, the OSS, and others (including agents of other Allies) to get any and all documents for various uses--to stock international collections at U.S. and European research libraries, to use information for intelligence purposes, and to prevent unique and valuable books from being destroyed or looted so they could be saved or even restored to their owners. That last sentence may give you some idea of what a mess the author was trying to organize--should the effort be described by the kind of document, the organization or people trying to acquire the documents, or what? Each would involve some overlap, and the author never quite decides. Also thrown in there from time to time is notice that the "Monuments Men" were around, but not really interested in books and documents, being more oriented toward fine art and actual monuments, like historic buildings. So the first part of the book is hard to follow and I wish the author and her editors could have run it through the "how to best organize this?" mill another time or two. But what's really missing from the book are some people's stories and examples of how particular documents were almost destroyed or looted and how important they were, and maybe how they were restored to their owners, just to give the reader some touchstones.
Despite that omission, the book makes clear that the war produced literal tons of documents and books, some more worth preserving than others. An entire chapter (rather than scattered mentions throughout the book) could have been devoted to how the Americans dealt with the need to destroy, or at least get out of Nazi and German hands, the vast amount of propaganda and Nazified literature and textbooks, without resorted to the techniques of the Nazis themselves (such as book-burning and restricting access). Other topics could have had their own, more detailed and focused chapters, but I can almost hear the editors saying, "then the book would be too long. No one will want to read it." But it could have been much more useful and better organized for a researcher and a committed reader.
I think the author and her editors were having trouble deciding whether the book should be shorter and more readable, and thus more popular and saleable, or should be the definitive research source on its subjects, which would have made it longer, less readable to the general reader, and probably sell less. As it is, they did not land squarely on either choice. The author has done a lot of research, beginning with her discovery that her uncle was one of the document gatherers/spies, but she doesn't tell of his or any of his compatriots' clandestine adventures, once again missing a chance to connect to the reader if those stories were available. She suggests that the efforts described in the book led to the modern field of information science and to the current way of doing things in library science, including eventually WorldCat and collections such as ProQuest, but doesn't trace that story in any detail. The definitive stories could have, and probably should have, taken up more than one book. This one is not as thorough as it could have been to create a book truly helpful for research but is too much of a tome to be a popular, general read, as the title suggests it was meant to be.