I’d been a fan of Archer Mayor for many, many years. ‘The Orphan’s Guilt’ is the 16th novel I’ve read by him. I’ve always said with any one of his books, unlike a box of chocolates, you know exactly what you’re going to get. A well-written procedural with likeable and relatable characters, crisp dialogue, an unexpected plot twist thrown in and a bit of history about Vermont.
I’ve always felt a connection to Joe, Willy, Sammie and Les. How can you not? Mr. Mayor brings them to life and I feel like I actually know them.
No, his novels don’t change the way you look at life. They’re not the type of books you’re still thinking about a week later. However, they are enjoyable, they pass a few nights. And really, isn’t that what a book is supposed to do?
As a longtime fan, this hurts to write but I’ve come to the conclusion that Mr. Mayor is like an athlete who doesn’t know when it’s time to retire. Or at least take a break. Perhaps come up with new characters. I feel he’s gone about as far as he can with the VBI.
I’d continually rated his novels 4 and 5 stars time and time again. The last few books, I rated 2 and 3. And now, for the first time, I simply could not finish reading one. I gave up on ‘The Orphan’s Guilt.’
On one hand, the case itself was interesting, a good idea and not the same ol’ same ol so I give him credit for that. However, that’s about the only positive I can say. Yes, there were a few instances of the old Archer Mayor but those were few and far between.
This book was relatively short at only 274 pages. However, it was incredibly slow and boring and tedious. I got to page 200 and gave up. I didn’t care who was guilty, what their MO was, or even if Joe and company nabbed the bad guy.
Yes, Mr. Mayor always sprinkles in some history about Vermont. I’ve always enjoyed that. However, he really overdid it in this book. At times, I didn’t know if I was reading a fiction novel or a pamphlet put together by the Vermont Bureau of Tourism.
As stated earlier, I always felt a connection with the characters. However, sadly, I don’t even feel that anymore. People change. People evolve. We all do. I’m not the same person I was 10 or 15 years ago. I’m sure you’re not either. And no, I’m not talking about tastes in music or political leanings.
That being said, these characters---Joe, Willy, Sammie and Lester—have NEVER changed. They are still the same exact people they were when we first met them 25 or so years ago.
Joe Gunther is an ‘old soul’ who’s a by the book type. Willy Kunkle is sarcastic but deep down has a heart of gold. Sammie Martens is still and always will be plagued by self-doubt and Lester Spinney remains the perfect straight man. None of these people have changed one iota and I find that impossible to believe. It does not ring true. Take a moment and think where you were 10 or 15 years ago. Are you the same person now as you were then?
I’d always been a fan of his dialogue. However, even that now seems…forced. Here’s why:
Although we all speak English, we use different words. Someone who’s a college graduate will talk better than someone who dropped out of middle school. A surgeon will use different words and jargon than a teacher. Men and women don’t talk the same. A man in his 50’s doesn’t talk like a teenager. Also, where we live plays a role into how we speak. For instance, in most cities in America, it’s a ‘Coke’ but in Chicago, people say ‘pop.’ Out west where I live people say ‘freeways’ or ‘highways’ whereas back east, people say parkways or thruways. Same language, different words.
However, in ‘The Orphan’s Guilt,’ every person—no matter where they come from, their gender, their work experience or their age---all use the same words and talk the same. This is not realistic.
I don’t want to sound like I’m nitpicking but I know Mr. Mayor is an older fellow. However, this book was filled with characters who all have old sounding names, no matter their age. Google popular baby names from 2005. They will be very different from popular baby names from 1975.
And that list will be vastly different than popular baby names from 1945. My grandparents, for example, have names you never hear anymore. My parents have names that were popular when they were born but that you don’t come across often. My name is Rob, short for Robert, which was a popular name when I was born but now is fading.
Yet, in this book, almost everyone—no matter their age—had an old sounding name: This book included John and Pete and Sally and Stanley and Martha and Anne and Carol and Peggy and Diane. Again, it does not ring true.
Yes, Mr. Mayor has always written police procedurals a la Michael Connelly or Ed McBain back in the day. However, a procedural also has to be entertaining and enjoyable. This book was not. This ‘procedural’ reads more like a textbook.
Lastly, for some reason, I felt like the author was inserting himself into the story. In other words, there were scenes, say where Joe and Willy were discussing something, debating the best way to handle a particular situation. Willy would make his point. Then, the author would jump in and explain why this wasn’t a good idea. Why do that? Have your character do it. If Willy’s idea is not a good one, let Joe explain why, don’t become a narrator in your own novel.
I never thought I’d rate an Archer Mayor book one star, much less not even finish one. But if one thing 2020 has shown us, is nothing is routine and normal anymore