What do you think?
Rate this book
Literature Now
Bookishness: Loving Books in a Digital Age
Twenty-first-century culture is obsessed with books. In a time when many voices have joined to predict the death of print, books continue to resurface in new and unexpected ways. From the proliferation of "shelfies" to Jane Austen-themed leggings and from decorative pillows printed with beloved book covers to bookwork sculptures exhibited in prestigious collections, books are everywhere and are not just for reading. Writers have caught up with this trend: many contemporary novels depict books as central characters or fetishize paper and print thematically and formally.
In Bookishness, Jessica Pressman examines the new status of the book as object and symbol. She explores the rise of "bookishness" as an identity and an aesthetic strategy that proliferates from store-window décor to experimental writing. Ranging from literature to kitsch objects, stop-motion animation films to book design, Pressman considers the multivalent meanings of books in contemporary culture. Books can represent shelter from--or a weapon against--the dangers of the digital; they can act as memorials and express a sense of loss. Examining the works of writers such as Jonathan Safran Foer, Jennifer Egan, Mark Z. Danielewski, and Leanne Shapton, Pressman illuminates the status of the book as a fetish object and its significance for understanding contemporary fakery. Bringing together media studies, book history, and literary criticism, Bookishness explains how books still give meaning to our lives in a digital age.
In Bookishness, Jessica Pressman examines the new status of the book as object and symbol. She explores the rise of "bookishness" as an identity and an aesthetic strategy that proliferates from store-window décor to experimental writing. Ranging from literature to kitsch objects, stop-motion animation films to book design, Pressman considers the multivalent meanings of books in contemporary culture. Books can represent shelter from--or a weapon against--the dangers of the digital; they can act as memorials and express a sense of loss. Examining the works of writers such as Jonathan Safran Foer, Jennifer Egan, Mark Z. Danielewski, and Leanne Shapton, Pressman illuminates the status of the book as a fetish object and its significance for understanding contemporary fakery. Bringing together media studies, book history, and literary criticism, Bookishness explains how books still give meaning to our lives in a digital age.
216 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2020
15 people are currently reading
338 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 40 reviews
November 10, 2020
When I saw Bookishness available for request on NetGalley it sounded like just the book for me. I have been an avid reader since childhood, and in addition to books themselves, I love book-related objects. I had anticipated this work would be a discussion of the rise of bookish items in different settings, and to some extent it was; however, a good chunk of the text was dedicated to reviewing/dissecting books the author believed were a reaction to the supposed death of the book in physical form. That might have been interesting had I known the works in question, but I had never even heard of any of them, let alone read them. To put that in context, I read, on average, 200 books a year. Those texts include works both old and new across a wide range of genres. Yet the books referenced meant nothing to me. Not even the authors' names rang any bells, suggesting that the average reader might not have come across them either. I therefore skimmed through those chapters, since I had no reference point for the discussion. In conclusion, while there were some interesting passages, I felt the focus of Bookishness was too narrow to make it appealing to the general reader/book fan. Only someone who has read a lot of experimental fiction and knows all the works mentioned will really get the full benefit. Perhaps the blurb is somewhat to blame, as it suggested a different focal point for the book than the one actually provided in the text. In the end, I would give this work three stars. I liked the idea, but the narrow focus alienates the average reader, and a more general overview of bookish items might have welcomed a wider audience.
I received this book as a free eBook ARC via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
I received this book as a free eBook ARC via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
July 7, 2021
Heads up to anyone who is drawn in by the cute image of bookshelves on a sneaker on the cover. This book is not a casual, fun read. This is a text book with a serious, well-written analysis of books in the digital age.
Read
April 25, 2025technically only read certain chapters but idc im counting it ♡
June 28, 2021
коли назва цікавіша за зміст. авторка окреслює безліч сучасних "книжностей", артефактів, що імітують книгу або її реінтерпретують, однак дуже поверхово їх осмислює, хоч і намагається задіяти різноманітні сучасні концепції, але вони нічого не пояснюють, а радше йдуть строкатим і самодостатнім візерунком. книзі бракує цільності й методології, бо Прессман пробує дослідити то сучасну літературу, то легінси з текстом Джейн Остін, то свій чохол для Макбука, і зрештою закінчує тим, що її донька любить читати. сумбур замість музики, але кілька цікавих думок я для своєї колонки поцупив :)
December 28, 2020
This book has got it all. The prose is charming, snappy, and manages impressively to transpose complex theoretical criticism into elegant arguments. Its intelligence works in harmony with Pressman’s intimate and moving reflection on her life as a reader, scholar and mother. It gently asks for slow, close reading in exchange for great literary reward. Each chapter is sturdily independent and intricate, while the sum is greater than its parts. Pressman’s ideas are impeccably well supported by analysis and evidence from diverse sources. Her research shows the vast amount of discourse on the subject already, while this publication acts as a milestone in technological and social progression.
In a book endeavoring to encapsulate the loftiness of subjects such as books themselves, their history of production, and all properties of books, this book is remarkably in tune with the real world. Pressman is insightful and candid about bookishness as a byproduct of elitism and capitalism. She brings attention to important issues related to class, access, and inequity around literacy while illustrating how the fetishes in culture associated with books are rooted in social capital.
At the same time, Pressman makes you want to tenderly curl up with a book. She inspires you to read again if you’ve lost the will and motivates you to explore the new forms of literature that are upon us. It even motivated me to clean up my bookshelf of dying titles and decaying spines in order to make space (literally and figuratively). The book ignites hope and anticipation for all the coming innovations in contemporary life during the digital renaissance.
By dissecting “bookishness”, Pressman awakens a sensitivity to the multiple ways that superficie, vanity and nostalgia thrive in the modern, urban world. Since I read this book, I have been delightfully noticing the ways everything I read attempts to either embrace or circumvent its publication format, how people advertise themselves with bookish identities (I’m looking at you, folks with bookshelves in your Zoom backgrounds), and fondly remembering the stories I once loved which themselves were about storytelling.
This makes an extraordinary gift to everyone who loves reading and writing. Jessica Pressman has made a monument, one which I foresee will garner a spot on syllabi for college English courses everywhere. The only warning I have for this book is that it’s going to make you want to buy every publication it references.
I found a degree of optimism we, as bookworms, all might need at the end of a harrowing year. She demonstrates how across the centuries patterns and advances in politics, economics, and technology confirm we ought not worry about the end of the Book. Our attachment to books will not be confined to nostalgia as our options and access to literature continue to increase and diversify. Book reading, buying, displaying (even wearing) is becoming a bigger and better pastime. We’re barely in the beginning.
In a book endeavoring to encapsulate the loftiness of subjects such as books themselves, their history of production, and all properties of books, this book is remarkably in tune with the real world. Pressman is insightful and candid about bookishness as a byproduct of elitism and capitalism. She brings attention to important issues related to class, access, and inequity around literacy while illustrating how the fetishes in culture associated with books are rooted in social capital.
At the same time, Pressman makes you want to tenderly curl up with a book. She inspires you to read again if you’ve lost the will and motivates you to explore the new forms of literature that are upon us. It even motivated me to clean up my bookshelf of dying titles and decaying spines in order to make space (literally and figuratively). The book ignites hope and anticipation for all the coming innovations in contemporary life during the digital renaissance.
By dissecting “bookishness”, Pressman awakens a sensitivity to the multiple ways that superficie, vanity and nostalgia thrive in the modern, urban world. Since I read this book, I have been delightfully noticing the ways everything I read attempts to either embrace or circumvent its publication format, how people advertise themselves with bookish identities (I’m looking at you, folks with bookshelves in your Zoom backgrounds), and fondly remembering the stories I once loved which themselves were about storytelling.
This makes an extraordinary gift to everyone who loves reading and writing. Jessica Pressman has made a monument, one which I foresee will garner a spot on syllabi for college English courses everywhere. The only warning I have for this book is that it’s going to make you want to buy every publication it references.
I found a degree of optimism we, as bookworms, all might need at the end of a harrowing year. She demonstrates how across the centuries patterns and advances in politics, economics, and technology confirm we ought not worry about the end of the Book. Our attachment to books will not be confined to nostalgia as our options and access to literature continue to increase and diversify. Book reading, buying, displaying (even wearing) is becoming a bigger and better pastime. We’re barely in the beginning.
December 3, 2020
Bookishness: Loving Books in a Digital Age, by Jessica Pressman, has a solid core of analysis at its center, as she explores the way books, and how we feel about them and read them, has changed (or not) in our digital culture. But I often found myself wishing she’d gone deeper or more fully into particular areas.
For instance, in one section she talks about how the imagery of pre-digital books is coopted in our modern world or fetishized (using the more anthropological meaning and not the pop culture more sexual one) via Jane Austen book spreads or the iBooks bookshelf icon etc. That seemed ripe for a deeper dive into Steve Job’s insistence on that sort of skeuomorphism, as it’s called, and how that was a battle that skeuomorph proponents won early on in the early digital but that they more recently have been losing. There were several other sections that seemed ripe for further discussion.
On the flip side, some might find that her close readings of several novels might go into too much detail, dependent on how familiar they are with the books, or at least the authors and their themes. For instance, she performs extended analysis Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves and Steven Hall’s Raw Shark Texts as allegories for the “deeply felt sense that the digital is changing our lives in unforeseen and unfathomable ways, and they position the book . . . as a kind of weapon against disembodied data.” She does a similar analysis of Jonathan Safran Foer’s Tree of Codes, whose story is too complex to go into here but suffice to say is probably more “art” or “sculpture” than it is “book.” Pressman does a good job of concisely summarizing and then explaining the books (at least the first two, which I’ve read, I can’t say for sure regarding the Foer), but those sections would certainly be more fully appreciated by those who are familiar with the works.
Beyond Foer’s product, she also looks at actual book sculptures, as well as stop action films and the entire fields of book kitsch and book “fakery” as she calls it. There again, in our desire for a nostalgic return to the days of yore with “real” books (she notes that distinction doesn’t make much sense and does a good job of explaining why), I wouldn’t have minded more cultural analysis. The same for the ways in which books have always been markers for class and other hierarchical distinctions, though really that’s just complaining Pressman didn’t write the book I wanted but instead the one she did, which is hardly a valid criticism.
The one thing I will say is that this is more of an academic lit-crit or social crit book, and I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of people see its cover and blurb (“loving books in a digital age”) and expect a more casual, more pop culture/memoir-ish kind of work only to find themselves disappointed at best and at sea at worst. But if you know what you’re getting into, it’s an interesting exploration, if somewhat of a tease.
For instance, in one section she talks about how the imagery of pre-digital books is coopted in our modern world or fetishized (using the more anthropological meaning and not the pop culture more sexual one) via Jane Austen book spreads or the iBooks bookshelf icon etc. That seemed ripe for a deeper dive into Steve Job’s insistence on that sort of skeuomorphism, as it’s called, and how that was a battle that skeuomorph proponents won early on in the early digital but that they more recently have been losing. There were several other sections that seemed ripe for further discussion.
On the flip side, some might find that her close readings of several novels might go into too much detail, dependent on how familiar they are with the books, or at least the authors and their themes. For instance, she performs extended analysis Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves and Steven Hall’s Raw Shark Texts as allegories for the “deeply felt sense that the digital is changing our lives in unforeseen and unfathomable ways, and they position the book . . . as a kind of weapon against disembodied data.” She does a similar analysis of Jonathan Safran Foer’s Tree of Codes, whose story is too complex to go into here but suffice to say is probably more “art” or “sculpture” than it is “book.” Pressman does a good job of concisely summarizing and then explaining the books (at least the first two, which I’ve read, I can’t say for sure regarding the Foer), but those sections would certainly be more fully appreciated by those who are familiar with the works.
Beyond Foer’s product, she also looks at actual book sculptures, as well as stop action films and the entire fields of book kitsch and book “fakery” as she calls it. There again, in our desire for a nostalgic return to the days of yore with “real” books (she notes that distinction doesn’t make much sense and does a good job of explaining why), I wouldn’t have minded more cultural analysis. The same for the ways in which books have always been markers for class and other hierarchical distinctions, though really that’s just complaining Pressman didn’t write the book I wanted but instead the one she did, which is hardly a valid criticism.
The one thing I will say is that this is more of an academic lit-crit or social crit book, and I wouldn’t be surprised if a lot of people see its cover and blurb (“loving books in a digital age”) and expect a more casual, more pop culture/memoir-ish kind of work only to find themselves disappointed at best and at sea at worst. But if you know what you’re getting into, it’s an interesting exploration, if somewhat of a tease.
November 3, 2020
Recently, during one of the coronasniffles outbreaks here in the UK, university students were confined to barracks, unable to attend libraries, lectures, societies, pubs or anything else they may have been concerned with. An image of a complaint about that situation went viral, but nobody seemed to bat an eyelid that behind the sign was another – a collection of large bottles of cheap white cider – ten or twelve litres of it; at least a week's supply. It seemed accepted that undergrads would be necking this stuff in large quantity, and the brand spoke volumes. But contrast that with their professors, perhaps asked to yack on about something in the media – they wouldn't be squatting alongside their drinks cabinet with its top brands. No, they'd be perched in some form of study in front of a thousand books, just in case we didn't think they were astute or academic enough to be worth our attention. The amount, and some visible titles, are what matters here, and perhaps organisation and layout, as branding in books seldom exists beyond Penguin colours. These moving 'shelfies' would never have been possible if all those complaints about the death of the book had come about. Yes, this book is designed to highlight how we still engage with book-type books, and how so many people rely on displaying them, and otherwise connecting with them, to sell themselves to the world just as the students used their choice of tipple. With ebooks a most unlikely way to do that, clearly the medium is still the message.
Our next two chapters here might be some ideal choices for talking heads backgrounds – novels that advertise the attributes of books, and all that they mean and all that they can do. The spoiler-high content here certainly reduces a few interesting-sounding volumes to mere background for those of us yet to read them. But beyond that the book continues on that furrow – merely discussing a few select titles, and doing it well, but (a) not in a friendly-for-the-general-bus-commuter manner, and (b) not really in a convincing manner. I thought this would be how we still engage with that bit of stiffened outer (perhaps with a paper surround), and all the pages within, but it wasn't really a cultural history of the book as is, circa 2020, but a literary criticism of a rarefied few volumes that prove in their own sweet ways that books as a medium have to exist in order to allow for their very existence.
Hence a Safran Foer article, a mere snip (pun intended) at £100 on amazon, that allegedly takes an echt book and sends robot-formed holes down through its pages, cutting out words, creating artificial pauses and new meanings and creating a new text. Hence books that come with stuff, such as S, by (sic) J J Abrams. Hence the chapter I looked forward to most, once I knew to expect it, about House of Leaves. But this book tells me that, because I read it without signing up for the official soundtrack CD, and looking at the website (at a time I was not yet online), I didn't read it correctly, and in fact it's not a most meta and most wonderful ghost/horror story, but a riposte to the 'end of the book' brigade, and all their ironically online screeds.
None of those selections above convinced, as I say, for different reasons – the Safran Foer claims something that's bloody obvious about his book to be almost a twist unforeseen, the S content accurately claims the connections between the item and these pages' ethos as artifice, and the Danielewski was an inevitable let-down. I thought this would be akin to one of those Bloomsbury "Object Lessons" books – those I routinely describe as being about something you'd never find yourself reading about. This, with its high-falutin' academic style, is not something you'd probably find yourself reading about. It aimed at too few targets, and while hitting them didn't make a full quiver, or whatever the heck my allegory is trying to say. Nowhere here is an engagement with how the hoi polloi still like their books – the weight stopping their poolside towel from blowing away, the faux-antique shelves of plastic in pubs about two years old, the hollowed-out Ali Smith hardback I found as a jewellery safe in one job lot of book stock I bought a year or three back. What we have is reasonable, if you're in academe, and can agree that about a dozen entities makes an ethos, and that hypothesis, method, conclusion can be had from so little data. Me, I'm down the corner shop for some 9% cider.
Our next two chapters here might be some ideal choices for talking heads backgrounds – novels that advertise the attributes of books, and all that they mean and all that they can do. The spoiler-high content here certainly reduces a few interesting-sounding volumes to mere background for those of us yet to read them. But beyond that the book continues on that furrow – merely discussing a few select titles, and doing it well, but (a) not in a friendly-for-the-general-bus-commuter manner, and (b) not really in a convincing manner. I thought this would be how we still engage with that bit of stiffened outer (perhaps with a paper surround), and all the pages within, but it wasn't really a cultural history of the book as is, circa 2020, but a literary criticism of a rarefied few volumes that prove in their own sweet ways that books as a medium have to exist in order to allow for their very existence.
Hence a Safran Foer article, a mere snip (pun intended) at £100 on amazon, that allegedly takes an echt book and sends robot-formed holes down through its pages, cutting out words, creating artificial pauses and new meanings and creating a new text. Hence books that come with stuff, such as S, by (sic) J J Abrams. Hence the chapter I looked forward to most, once I knew to expect it, about House of Leaves. But this book tells me that, because I read it without signing up for the official soundtrack CD, and looking at the website (at a time I was not yet online), I didn't read it correctly, and in fact it's not a most meta and most wonderful ghost/horror story, but a riposte to the 'end of the book' brigade, and all their ironically online screeds.
None of those selections above convinced, as I say, for different reasons – the Safran Foer claims something that's bloody obvious about his book to be almost a twist unforeseen, the S content accurately claims the connections between the item and these pages' ethos as artifice, and the Danielewski was an inevitable let-down. I thought this would be akin to one of those Bloomsbury "Object Lessons" books – those I routinely describe as being about something you'd never find yourself reading about. This, with its high-falutin' academic style, is not something you'd probably find yourself reading about. It aimed at too few targets, and while hitting them didn't make a full quiver, or whatever the heck my allegory is trying to say. Nowhere here is an engagement with how the hoi polloi still like their books – the weight stopping their poolside towel from blowing away, the faux-antique shelves of plastic in pubs about two years old, the hollowed-out Ali Smith hardback I found as a jewellery safe in one job lot of book stock I bought a year or three back. What we have is reasonable, if you're in academe, and can agree that about a dozen entities makes an ethos, and that hypothesis, method, conclusion can be had from so little data. Me, I'm down the corner shop for some 9% cider.
December 17, 2020
Thanks to netgalley for the ARC in exchange for a fair and honest review. An interesting read, about how our love of actual books is being replaced with the convenience of digital books. Reading it (ironically on my Kindle) did get me thinking about how much I still love walking into bookstores and libraries and browsing and smelling the books despite 70% of the books I consume are now in digital format, more for convenience than anything else. This book had me reminiscing over how some of my most favourite of books I will always want to have in book form on my bookshelves just for the happiness and fond memories they give me. Whilst some of this book was spent discussing some books I wasn't familiar with, overall it's a great read for any book lover. ⭐⭐⭐#netgalley #tea_sipping_bookworm #goodreads #greatreads #bookishness #jessicapressman #bookstagram #bookqueen #litsy #amazonkindle
December 16, 2020
Thanks to Netgalley for the gifted copy in exchange for an honest review!
This academic book seeks to delve deeper into what is a book? How does the digitization of our culture change what a book looks like and acts like? The author really shined when discussing book art made from books, and how the book has operated throughout history, giving power to the people who read and learn from it. At times, specifically with some of the more avant- grade examples from the last decade or so, the author seems to get too detailed and lost my interest. Overall, I really enjoyed a lot of the argument presented and it made me think a lot about bookishness and why I myself love and want to be around books.
This academic book seeks to delve deeper into what is a book? How does the digitization of our culture change what a book looks like and acts like? The author really shined when discussing book art made from books, and how the book has operated throughout history, giving power to the people who read and learn from it. At times, specifically with some of the more avant- grade examples from the last decade or so, the author seems to get too detailed and lost my interest. Overall, I really enjoyed a lot of the argument presented and it made me think a lot about bookishness and why I myself love and want to be around books.
November 29, 2020
Reading Bookishness, a book which depicts the obsolescence of books in the conventional sense through the screen of my Kindle is a funny way to observe how 'bookishness' as Jessica Pressman terms it slowly affects our day-to-day life in the twenty-first century. The question remains, “When we are reading through our digital devices, e.g. our laptops, smartphones, tablet PCs, Kindles, are we really reading?” With the rise of new media and digital culture, the paradigm of reading has shifted from gazing into a collection of papers bound to a hardback, into scrolling in between pages cramped with blue-coloured hyperlinks here and there throughout the internet.
With no puns intended, the author happens to have a surname close to the sense of bookishness. Pressman indicates the labourer in the print shop who maintains the printing press. So much has changed in the printing industry ever since Gutenberg invented the first printing machine in the late fifteenth century. Mrs Pressman tries to assert her view in this book that digital media is not always bringing danger to the physical form of books. We have long forgotten how in the sixteenth century, Martin Luther was greatly benefited in reforming churches in Europe by the existence of Gutenberg’s printing machine which helped him to spread his first German-translated Bible edition and his other writings related to the practice of selling indulgences of the Roman Catholic Churches. Even the book itself was once a 'new media', which was initially viewed as a threat to order in medieval Europe.
Mrs Pressman provides careful analyses on the 'bookishness' phenomenon which happens as part of the cultural shift to the new media. There are anxieties that present with the way digital media started to replace our mode of interaction with the act of reading, in which the death of books as the ever-present challenge to be conquered. She provides us with cultural analysis through the spectrum of recent literary works which depict the notion of 'bookishness', such as Robin Sloane’s Mr. Penumbra's 24-Hour Bookstore which brings the central goal of bookishness through the depiction of books as a place to take refuge from the encroaching digital world that keeps surrounding us today. The anxieties as shown by several authors whose works she commented are discussed in details here, while also countering the general assumption of 'digital media replacing physical books'.
We forget that even several centuries ago, to be able to own hardbacks and have leisure time to read books are privileges exclusively held by the higher caste of the social stratum. The increasing efficiency of book production, the introduction of cheaper paperbacks and also the increase of literacy rate have contributed to book-forms to be more accessible to more people. We begin to take for granted these facts, while also the awareness of threats to conventional books posed by digital media contributed a lot to the 'bookishness' phenomenon. Mrs Pressman presents various examples in this book on how we begin to incorporate many both animate and inanimate objects to our daily life in order to feel more intense 'closeness' to the physical presence of books, by using objects such as book-shaped keychains, fake-book imageries, etc. It is interesting to read the author’s research which poses this phenomenon not as a dangerous threat to physical books, but rather as a complementary part of the cultural shift to digital media.
Her analysis also reflects on how we should face the never-ending pours of information through our digital media which keeps us connected 24 hours to the internet during this smartphone era. With physical books, at least we understand how it works. We could simply turn the pages from front cover to back cover. With the rise of Google and ever-more friendly user interface in our digital platform, the less we understand how the technology works. It illustrates clearly how we should view digital media and digital literacy in general, on how we should treat the way we acquire information that we digest every day. All in all, Mrs Pressman tries to present this phenomenon as part of fetishism towards the physical form of books. When digitisation threatens the physical version of books, there will be this reaction to fetishes it as an object.
Cannot say that I fully agree on the obsolescence of physical books. Even though I read some of my books on my Kindle and laptop, I would still prefer to read my books in paperbacks that I could smell and touch. There are also the benefits of the physical presence of books, that would be easily lent to my friends and discussed rather than e-books. It gives me a chance to exchange view with someone whom I happened to see reading similar books that I have read before or to take a glance into someone else’s private bookshelves to encounter if we have any similarities. Maybe I am part of the old-school conservatives in this sense, but we could not deny the fact that digital media has slowly transformed our interaction with books. Even though Mrs Pressman’s book is written in the academic style, it is a wonderful appreciation of the cultural shift through this 'bookishness' phenomenon and a hopeful reminder on how we should view digital literacy.
===
I received the Advance Reader Copy from Columbia University Press through NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
With no puns intended, the author happens to have a surname close to the sense of bookishness. Pressman indicates the labourer in the print shop who maintains the printing press. So much has changed in the printing industry ever since Gutenberg invented the first printing machine in the late fifteenth century. Mrs Pressman tries to assert her view in this book that digital media is not always bringing danger to the physical form of books. We have long forgotten how in the sixteenth century, Martin Luther was greatly benefited in reforming churches in Europe by the existence of Gutenberg’s printing machine which helped him to spread his first German-translated Bible edition and his other writings related to the practice of selling indulgences of the Roman Catholic Churches. Even the book itself was once a 'new media', which was initially viewed as a threat to order in medieval Europe.
Mrs Pressman provides careful analyses on the 'bookishness' phenomenon which happens as part of the cultural shift to the new media. There are anxieties that present with the way digital media started to replace our mode of interaction with the act of reading, in which the death of books as the ever-present challenge to be conquered. She provides us with cultural analysis through the spectrum of recent literary works which depict the notion of 'bookishness', such as Robin Sloane’s Mr. Penumbra's 24-Hour Bookstore which brings the central goal of bookishness through the depiction of books as a place to take refuge from the encroaching digital world that keeps surrounding us today. The anxieties as shown by several authors whose works she commented are discussed in details here, while also countering the general assumption of 'digital media replacing physical books'.
We forget that even several centuries ago, to be able to own hardbacks and have leisure time to read books are privileges exclusively held by the higher caste of the social stratum. The increasing efficiency of book production, the introduction of cheaper paperbacks and also the increase of literacy rate have contributed to book-forms to be more accessible to more people. We begin to take for granted these facts, while also the awareness of threats to conventional books posed by digital media contributed a lot to the 'bookishness' phenomenon. Mrs Pressman presents various examples in this book on how we begin to incorporate many both animate and inanimate objects to our daily life in order to feel more intense 'closeness' to the physical presence of books, by using objects such as book-shaped keychains, fake-book imageries, etc. It is interesting to read the author’s research which poses this phenomenon not as a dangerous threat to physical books, but rather as a complementary part of the cultural shift to digital media.
Her analysis also reflects on how we should face the never-ending pours of information through our digital media which keeps us connected 24 hours to the internet during this smartphone era. With physical books, at least we understand how it works. We could simply turn the pages from front cover to back cover. With the rise of Google and ever-more friendly user interface in our digital platform, the less we understand how the technology works. It illustrates clearly how we should view digital media and digital literacy in general, on how we should treat the way we acquire information that we digest every day. All in all, Mrs Pressman tries to present this phenomenon as part of fetishism towards the physical form of books. When digitisation threatens the physical version of books, there will be this reaction to fetishes it as an object.
Cannot say that I fully agree on the obsolescence of physical books. Even though I read some of my books on my Kindle and laptop, I would still prefer to read my books in paperbacks that I could smell and touch. There are also the benefits of the physical presence of books, that would be easily lent to my friends and discussed rather than e-books. It gives me a chance to exchange view with someone whom I happened to see reading similar books that I have read before or to take a glance into someone else’s private bookshelves to encounter if we have any similarities. Maybe I am part of the old-school conservatives in this sense, but we could not deny the fact that digital media has slowly transformed our interaction with books. Even though Mrs Pressman’s book is written in the academic style, it is a wonderful appreciation of the cultural shift through this 'bookishness' phenomenon and a hopeful reminder on how we should view digital literacy.
===
I received the Advance Reader Copy from Columbia University Press through NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
March 22, 2023
Hendige bron
November 15, 2023
I enjoyed this exploration into the subject of Bookishness. I felt her writing style to be approachable which I believe was an advantage entering into this subject I had never read about before. I do have to say it explored a wide range of works I had never heard of before, which was at times a bit too much.
March 28, 2021
To be honest, I was really excited about this, considering how much I love books about books, and the many "bookish" items that I see around me, especially because I have been reading more nonfiction recently after how much I loved The Library Book. However, this book was written with a very academic and technical tone (somewhat to be expected for a book written by a professor), which would be fine for someone who knew the subject matter very well, but as a casual reader, I had to force myself to finish it. This says a lot considering the actual content of the book is slightly under 200 pages. (This page count includes the references and index, which themselves take up almost 50 pages).
The book went into extreme detail analyzing various multimedia/experimental works which, the majority of the time, I had honestly never heard of and therefore could not fully appreciate the analysis of. Frankly, most of these works did not seem like they were at all known in the mainstream, one of them being cited as such a "failure" that it was not even listed in the author's previous works in future books. The only- and I repeat- the only work I had heard of in this book was Chris Colfer's The Land of Stories: The Wishing Spell, incorrectly cited as The Wishing Well, which is not analyzed in the same way as the other works but rather used as a touchpoint to connect her ideas about bookishness to her daughter.
As much as I had trouble connecting to this book, I did learn a bit about bookish culture, although not as much as I was expecting. It is clear that the author spent years researching the subject, and although I may not have been the intended audience, I can appreciate the effort that went into this work. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this to the average reader, but if someone was very interested in experimental multimedia and its effects, this may be something they would enjoy.
The book went into extreme detail analyzing various multimedia/experimental works which, the majority of the time, I had honestly never heard of and therefore could not fully appreciate the analysis of. Frankly, most of these works did not seem like they were at all known in the mainstream, one of them being cited as such a "failure" that it was not even listed in the author's previous works in future books. The only- and I repeat- the only work I had heard of in this book was Chris Colfer's The Land of Stories: The Wishing Spell, incorrectly cited as The Wishing Well, which is not analyzed in the same way as the other works but rather used as a touchpoint to connect her ideas about bookishness to her daughter.
As much as I had trouble connecting to this book, I did learn a bit about bookish culture, although not as much as I was expecting. It is clear that the author spent years researching the subject, and although I may not have been the intended audience, I can appreciate the effort that went into this work. Overall, I wouldn't recommend this to the average reader, but if someone was very interested in experimental multimedia and its effects, this may be something they would enjoy.
November 28, 2020
BOOKISHNESS by professor & literature scholar Jessica Pressman sits at the intersection of academia and bookstagram. on bookstagram, the term ‘bookish’ describes activities, merchandise, or even people that/who revolve around books. I felt delighted to discover — thank you Netgalley — that this academic scholar takes bookishness seriously through an analytical, scholarly & theoretical lens. her research question was essentially how/why did representations of physical books persist into a digital or even post-digital era. Pressman contends that the culture of ‘bookishness’ deserves serious consideration owing to its significance for how people discover each other & themselves through books. according to Pressman, through bookishness & bookish representations, readers feel understood & known and connect w/ a community of readers. notable quotations & nuggets of wisdom are abundant i.e. “I want books around and want to feel all the feelings of having them near, for the interchange of attachments is part of how I recognize myself.” this idea takes on increased significance after audio & especially electronic books are widely available. while a hobbyist bookstagrammer might feel unamused by academic jargon like a scholar might think they’re above the industry of bookishness (spoiler: they’re not), both hobbyist & scholar will finish Pressman’s book taking bookishness seriously.
Read
July 9, 2023[research for my master's thesis, probably a 3,5/5]
Boa leitura para interessados em literatura no geral, principalmente focado num contexto digital (ou pós-digital).
Boa leitura para interessados em literatura no geral, principalmente focado num contexto digital (ou pós-digital).
November 21, 2020
ARC for review. EPD - 12/1/20.
In this digital age when we no longer need the physical object of a book to read, what about us craves the "symbol, art form and artifact?" The book is divided into sections, first taking a look at objects, from "high art to absolute kitsch" (paintings of beautiful libraries around the world to a Pride and Prejudiceduvet cover).
Pressman also examines attitudes toward reading and books, noting that surveys from the Census Bureau in 2002 report that for the first time in modern history fewer than half the adult population in America reads "literature" (I'm surprised it was even close to fifty percent and wonder if people weren't lying. I'm also wondering what sort of census forms other people are getting and why I never get asked any good questions.). Anyway, depressing, and I only imagine those numbers are continuing to sink like a stone.
There's also a discussion about books about books and libraries and a full chapter about two books, one of which is one of my all time favorites, House of Leaves, as these are two books written in experimental style (The Raw Shark Texts is the other. I have read both of these.) so as to be books that are...should we say self aware about being books? In a way. Difficult to explain if you haven't read them.
The book is from the Columbia University Press, which should alert you that it's an academic text, not a fun text with lots of photos of various book products (there are a few), so if that's what you are looking for, look elsewhere. However, if you are fascinated the the two books above and similar books (The Ice-Bound Concordance, S., etc...and I am), as well as Jonathan Safran Foer's Tree of Codes< which sounds terrible to me), this might be worth a bit of your time.
In this digital age when we no longer need the physical object of a book to read, what about us craves the "symbol, art form and artifact?" The book is divided into sections, first taking a look at objects, from "high art to absolute kitsch" (paintings of beautiful libraries around the world to a Pride and Prejudiceduvet cover).
Pressman also examines attitudes toward reading and books, noting that surveys from the Census Bureau in 2002 report that for the first time in modern history fewer than half the adult population in America reads "literature" (I'm surprised it was even close to fifty percent and wonder if people weren't lying. I'm also wondering what sort of census forms other people are getting and why I never get asked any good questions.). Anyway, depressing, and I only imagine those numbers are continuing to sink like a stone.
There's also a discussion about books about books and libraries and a full chapter about two books, one of which is one of my all time favorites, House of Leaves, as these are two books written in experimental style (The Raw Shark Texts is the other. I have read both of these.) so as to be books that are...should we say self aware about being books? In a way. Difficult to explain if you haven't read them.
The book is from the Columbia University Press, which should alert you that it's an academic text, not a fun text with lots of photos of various book products (there are a few), so if that's what you are looking for, look elsewhere. However, if you are fascinated the the two books above and similar books (The Ice-Bound Concordance, S., etc...and I am), as well as Jonathan Safran Foer's Tree of Codes< which sounds terrible to me), this might be worth a bit of your time.
March 19, 2021
a sharp collection of essays about the place of the book in today's digital society that requires more than one read to fully appreciate the extent of the author's analysis.
this book was quite clearly written by an academic for other academics. as such, there were times that i, an academic but not in the literary field, wanted to roll my eyes at the conclusions drawn about a particular line of a particular page in a particular book and what that says about bookishness as a whole. however, there were also several lines i wished i could underline and come back to to reflect upon more.
i was originally drawn to this book because of the promise of its subtitle: "loving books in a digital age." as someone who watches booktube videos from time to time, i have noticed the heightened commodification of the appearance of reading in the book hauls and subscription box unboxings in the more popular channels. "bookishness" presented me with some of the analysis i was searching for, but also went far beyond what i was expecting. i think i would need to reread this book at least once, preferably with a bookclub or literary scholar on standby to fully process the material.
overall, i enjoyed my time with "bookishness," though due to its density i had to spread out reading it over a couple months. while i do not fully agree with all of pressman's scholarly conclusions, i did learn a significant amount and was presented with an abundance of thought-provoking tidbits about the history of books, their presence and purpose in society, and how it has changed as technology has advanced.
thank you to netgalley and columbia university press for an e-arc in exchange for an honest review.
this book was quite clearly written by an academic for other academics. as such, there were times that i, an academic but not in the literary field, wanted to roll my eyes at the conclusions drawn about a particular line of a particular page in a particular book and what that says about bookishness as a whole. however, there were also several lines i wished i could underline and come back to to reflect upon more.
i was originally drawn to this book because of the promise of its subtitle: "loving books in a digital age." as someone who watches booktube videos from time to time, i have noticed the heightened commodification of the appearance of reading in the book hauls and subscription box unboxings in the more popular channels. "bookishness" presented me with some of the analysis i was searching for, but also went far beyond what i was expecting. i think i would need to reread this book at least once, preferably with a bookclub or literary scholar on standby to fully process the material.
overall, i enjoyed my time with "bookishness," though due to its density i had to spread out reading it over a couple months. while i do not fully agree with all of pressman's scholarly conclusions, i did learn a significant amount and was presented with an abundance of thought-provoking tidbits about the history of books, their presence and purpose in society, and how it has changed as technology has advanced.
thank you to netgalley and columbia university press for an e-arc in exchange for an honest review.
November 14, 2020
'Bookishness' provides an analysis of the construction of the physical book as a symbol within a rapidly changing digital world. The book provides insightful thoughts into the commodification of bookish objects across social classes and provides an interesting discussion of consumption patterns. The book also assessed 'bookish artefacts' and the realms within which the physical book has managed to infiltrate, which I found evoked an interesting consideration of consumerism. I found this book to be extremely accessible, with clear examples, anecdotes and analysis. The author provides a wealth of knowledge and her tone shines through. It is clear to see the author takes a personal interest in this topic and not just a professional one.
This book is very much grounded in the literature, with most of the analysis stemming from the study of books. Whilst this narrative makes sense and provides a convincing argument, I had hoped when reading the description of this book that it would draw on literature from social sciences, in particular anthropology. Despite this, I still found 'Bookishness' to be incredibly interesting and think everyone within the book community should read it.
I look forward to reading more from Jessica Pressman and will 100% be exploring this topic further.
This book is very much grounded in the literature, with most of the analysis stemming from the study of books. Whilst this narrative makes sense and provides a convincing argument, I had hoped when reading the description of this book that it would draw on literature from social sciences, in particular anthropology. Despite this, I still found 'Bookishness' to be incredibly interesting and think everyone within the book community should read it.
I look forward to reading more from Jessica Pressman and will 100% be exploring this topic further.
February 24, 2021
This book's subtitle says it all " Loving books in a digital age". How do we experience and demonstrate our love for books if we do most of our reading on digital devices? The author investigates this phenomenon in its most diverse manifestations, from book-related kitsch (Jane-Austen themed leggings) to the way that even our digital devices imitate the experience of reading a classic paper-bound book (think of the swooshing sound when you "turn" a page on a Kindle). I liked the book because it made me think about my own love of books in a different way, and clarified to me why I still wince when I see art made out of physical books, even when they're hardly rare or precious.
On the minus side, well, it's an book written by a professor and printed by the Columbia University Press. Very densely written, full of academic jargon and presupposing a certain level of familiarity with literary theory. Several chapters go into detail into books/movies/games that I have never heard of/seen/experienced, so they were only moderately illuminating to me.
I came across this book by happenstance in my local bookstore and decided to take a chance on it. I don't regret this, and I will certainly reread it, highlighter in hand, and check out the references at the end. But a light, cutesy read of the genre "bookish girl meets other members of her tribe" this is not.
On the minus side, well, it's an book written by a professor and printed by the Columbia University Press. Very densely written, full of academic jargon and presupposing a certain level of familiarity with literary theory. Several chapters go into detail into books/movies/games that I have never heard of/seen/experienced, so they were only moderately illuminating to me.
I came across this book by happenstance in my local bookstore and decided to take a chance on it. I don't regret this, and I will certainly reread it, highlighter in hand, and check out the references at the end. But a light, cutesy read of the genre "bookish girl meets other members of her tribe" this is not.
December 16, 2020
I see absolutely no irony in reading a book about books on my kindle. This is something that Jessica Pressman tackles in Bookishness (amongst every other nook and cranny you could possibly imagine). It's not about the old paradigm of the physical and the tangible, but about accepting what is coming and evolving with it. Pressman writes that books are here to stay if we accept the reality of what they can be as being bigger than those “death of the books” blowhards have been leading us to believe. Pressman has a knack at making the most complex ideas seem totally digestible, making something infinitely interesting from what might seem -- on paper -- to be a dry topic. Not since Pizza Hut had their ‘read 5 books and get a free personal pan pizza deal’ has the topic of books been so exciting. May this be the next great non-fiction read on your shelf. I can imagine book clubs gathering over this one, opening themselves up to the ideas of their own personal bookishness and learning something in the process. Like the last great used bookstore in a dying retail market, a real treasure. Buy it. Download it.
February 16, 2025
I should preface this review by admitting that I skimmed the hell out of this book. And I'm going follow that up with saying that I don't feel very bad about skimming this book.
I think the parts of Bookishness that are good are quite good. Interesting, well-researched, a wide-reaching historic perspective that is rare in discussions of modern turns for literature. It's a fun time to consider Jane Austen leggings serious objects of study.
However, (and this is unsurprising given Pressman's training) a lot of this book is just literary analysis. Which is fine. A little bit of literary analysis in every chapter would be great. But I was here for something else entirely: the serious study of Jane Austen leggings. And instead we get pages of analysis on House of Leaves, which for me undercut the whole point of the book to begin with. We're talking about the "extents" of bookishness, its kitsch and presence on social media. And to achieve this, we focus on well-respected literary classics? It just didn't quite work for me.
3/5 stars
I think the parts of Bookishness that are good are quite good. Interesting, well-researched, a wide-reaching historic perspective that is rare in discussions of modern turns for literature. It's a fun time to consider Jane Austen leggings serious objects of study.
However, (and this is unsurprising given Pressman's training) a lot of this book is just literary analysis. Which is fine. A little bit of literary analysis in every chapter would be great. But I was here for something else entirely: the serious study of Jane Austen leggings. And instead we get pages of analysis on House of Leaves, which for me undercut the whole point of the book to begin with. We're talking about the "extents" of bookishness, its kitsch and presence on social media. And to achieve this, we focus on well-respected literary classics? It just didn't quite work for me.
3/5 stars
November 26, 2020
Given the whimsical cover, I had hoped this book would be a love letter to books, readers, and bookishness. Instead, this was a scholarly, and sometimes cold, exploration of bookishness in history and culture. The last chapter offered a bit of redemption when the author shared a more personal experience, humanizing the voice of this book. That said, I don't think this book is meant to be read alone. It is well suited for a classroom discussion, and I rather wish I was able to consume this book in that context. The ability to read this book in community would have greatly enhanced the experience. Thank you NetGalley for this advance reader copy.
April 15, 2021
I don’t think this book is for everyone - it skews towards a very ‘academic’ tone most of the time, and I had trouble following some of the deep dives that the author does into specific books because of how niche the books were. Overall I would’ve liked to have read a bit more on the connection between bookishness and kitschy consumerism, as that’s what I was expecting from the summary. But the insights about bookishness and class signaling were interesting, and I appreciated that the author brought a new perspective to the argument that the rise of e-books and digital media are “killing” books (though she does point out the implications of Amazon’s reign over the book market).
December 23, 2023
I enjoyed this book enough - although I do think there is something to be said for personal taste intruding in on my non-fiction. I think it's a fantastic opinion piece but there is a place and a time for going whole ham on books that you feel were not as wonderful.
With that said, I am appreciative of any study of novels and books and what builds our world to be what it is. I think there is always interest and investment in the world of books, and I do enjoy a little peek into how people perceive the pieces of literature that others hold dear.
Thanks to NetGalley for the early review copy!
With that said, I am appreciative of any study of novels and books and what builds our world to be what it is. I think there is always interest and investment in the world of books, and I do enjoy a little peek into how people perceive the pieces of literature that others hold dear.
Thanks to NetGalley for the early review copy!
November 15, 2023
This is looking at the phenomenon of how we currently interact with books aside from reading. Since more and more people are reading using technology there are less overflowing bookshelves but other items are now available to show off our bookishness. Jessica Pressman looks into the questions of why people are buying the clothing, jewelry, fake book boxes and anything Jane Austen.
She also delves into experimental writing that needs to have an extra to be read, whether that is using websites or physical manipulation of materials. This is pretty academic but I found fascinating
She also delves into experimental writing that needs to have an extra to be read, whether that is using websites or physical manipulation of materials. This is pretty academic but I found fascinating
November 21, 2020
Very interesting academic take on bookishness, relatively easy to read but not really geared towards the average reader. Some of the chapters have a heavier focus on specific books, and you might want to read those before you get to this one afterwards - not having read them made it much harder to follow the author's reflection.
April 21, 2021
Bookishness is a work most suitable for academics within literature and/or English due to the density and deep analysis, but as I have a major in English, I wasn't that intimidated by the book. It's also clear that the author knows her stuff, but I may disagree with her on certain topic/conclusions.
November 27, 2020
3.5 stars (I rounded up) Interesting book about innovative books but probably too dense for the vast amount of the population. It did introduce me to a few works I was unaware of namely The Raw Shark Texts and The Tree of Code.
November 28, 2020
I love everything bookish. I enjoyed how writer has explained the conflict of physical books and ebooks. I liked all the pictures and how books are just a reading material it's much more than that. Being bookish is lifestyle. And I am proud to be the bookish.
November 27, 2020
This wasn't exactly what I was expecting or what the blurb implied. It is an academic work and very dense. Some of it was very interesting but unless you are a scholar studying books in the digital age, I don't think it would be for you. I managed to get through it but it was work at times.
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for the opportunity to read this book.
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for the opportunity to read this book.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 40 reviews