I didn't hate it but I also didn't like it. I found various problematic things in it like the middle-aged dood main character who, of course, makes assorted sexual observations about women, etc. Is it any surprise that the character reminds us that men think of sex every 6 seconds? Could the book have been as strong (or as weak) without those references? Yes. In other comments, I'm sure you could pretend to analyze it & come up with some "serious" discussion topics like the nature of miracles, or fame, or life in academia (jealousy abounds + you are controlled by the big-money donors), or weird, belligerent sideshow carnivals that kidnap the "performers" (well, probably no serious discussion related to that story divergence), or even just the basic humanity of ignoring your young child because you're too focused on yourself & your "useless miracle". Problem is, the story just wasn't interesting, the characters were not likeable (& they're too cartoonish to be true villains), & mostly I just didn't care about the depressed debunker, his sexy philanthropist wife who's also evil & pulling an awful lot of strings, & the weird inner ramblings of the main character related to his "miracle" of flying (4 inches from the ground). Plus, spoiler, flying dood was dumb enough to follow his fake-guru-who-has-been-indicted friend's advice to try flying higher by jumping off the roof. (Spoiler #2: he survives, just breaks something, I can't remember if it was his arm or his ankle.) Really? You're 40 & that stupid? Ok. Maybe I need to revise my first sentence of this paragraph: I think I did hate it (or at least came to that conclusion by the end).