Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

思索家邦:中國殖民主義狂潮下的香港

Rate this book
1997年7月1日,香港在《中英聯合聲明》承諾「一國兩制」50年不變的前提下,主權被移交予中國。然而不到20年,中共卻開始收緊香港自治,從2014年的「雨傘革命」,到2017年反對修訂《逃犯條例》的送中惡法,香港人不得不走上街頭,並屢屢刷新香港有史以來參與遊行的人數與規模。

在這樣的浪潮中,香港本土思潮開始萌芽,爭取民主自治,甚至港獨的主張陸續出現,香港人的自我認同度也越來越高。然而,在「一國兩制」的框架以及「中國特色」的治理當下,抱持對文化中國的曖昧認同,是否就能換取中國睜一隻眼、閉一隻眼的鬆綁?「港式愛國」或「既愛國,又怕國」的矛盾,缺乏主體的虛無認同,沒有國族基礎的抗爭行動,能否為香港帶來民主自由的曙光?

本文集作者徐承恩,繼探討香港源流史之後,針對香港現況,由國族主義的辯證出發,解說國族認同與民主自決運動的必然性,並解開中國國族外衣背後的帝國基因。藉由分析中國百年文明轉型的失敗,關照本土認同的萌芽並勾勒香港民族的輪廓,本書引領讀者抗拒向霸權屈服的「政治現實」,並從虛假的自由進步觀和文化情結中突圍,為東亞與世界的未來,建構想望和平的反殖共同體。

400 pages, Paperback

Published November 27, 2019

1 person is currently reading
29 people want to read

About the author

徐承恩

12 books2 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (42%)
4 stars
4 (57%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Winnie Yeung.
38 reviews2 followers
February 4, 2021
Chinese nationalism is based off of empirial expanionism, which deviates from the original sense of nationalism which embraces democracy, egalitarianism, and universalism. Hong Kong nationalism should reject the notion to merge with Chinese nationalism which rejects these universal ideals and instead build the unique identity based on the historical divergence since British occupation. (Even back before then, settlers lived in HK were vagabonds who rejected the old dynasties so stopped trying to justify the historical claims of HK belonging to China)
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.