I read a different version of this book, but I still think that it will count, right? Honestly, I don't think that this book was the best ever; I'd give it a two-and-a-half star rating. The part about David's mother... well, let's just say that it wasn't the prettiest picture you could put into an 11 year-old's head. But, other than that, it was a good read about a boy growing up, and all the advantages that come with it. I couldn't put it down!
This is, without a doubt, the worst book I have ever forced myself to read. Granted, I was in sixth or seventh grade at the time--and perhaps the book has some merit through the ideas of an adult. Yet, every time I think about this book, I vomit a little in my mouth. It probably doesn't deserve a re-read.
I liked some of the characters and how they came in and out of the story I listened to this book and typically develop an ear for the dialogue and the accent but I must admit, I found it intermittent and work to comprehend the finer details of what was going on, which I’m sure took away from the book I am a Dickens fan, from his stories to his characters and how he writes but this book at times a bit overwritten for me Not ruling out the time of year or how I was feeling at the time when I read it I will be interested to speak with persons who really enjoyed this book and there views on it
In preparation for Barbara Kingsolver's Demon Copperhead, I thought that I should read this one. I accidentally got a children's retelling, but figured that works. Good to get familiar withthe story.
Un libro que me parece mas dibujado (por un pintor prestigioso) que escrito. Todos los personajes estan tan bien descritos!! Y ademas son muchos. Un libro que cuenta muchas historias y que se lee con placer y da pena acabarlo me ha encantado
I respect it more than I loved it. The cast is memorable and the writing is often brilliant, but the length and digressions wore me down at times. Still, it’s an important classic and worth reading if you’re in the mood for a big Victorian life story.
Es uno de los grandes clásicos de Charles Dickens, como en muchas de sus obras es una crítica a la sociedad inglesa en tiempos del autor, la hipocresía y el clasismo
"I'm a Tartar," said the man with a wooden leg. He's a Tartar, she's a Tartar, wouldn't you like to be a Tartar too?" What can one say? It's a classic and who couldn't be sympathetic to David Copperfield (NOT the illusionist). Dickens is simply a fine storyteller, even if he has a funny name. (It was the best of names, it was the worst of names. I know different book).
The book I read is paperback and is only 239 pages. It is geared for younger readers but does have a lot of the story to it. I have never read one of his books before and since I bought these for my boys to read I thought I would read them, also. A Classic
What a corker! Dickens makes amazing use of language and his social commentary is second to none. I am happy to forgive his sentimental tendencies in light of his amazing ability to combine the words of the English language. His sum is indeed greater than it's parts!
This is THE Dickens to read IMO. I loved this book and I recommend it highly to any reader. A beautifully written classic with all the description and imagination you would expect from this master of literature from the olde country.
It is dreadful to consider a "review" of Dickens. It is the perfect time to read Dickens - hope in the face of despair and all those remarkably salient characters. Helps to have read Dickens in more than a perfunctory manner if you plan to see Slumdog Millionaire.