Jack Higgins’ novel, A Darker Place, is a workmanlike effort by a best-selling author that is likely to please his fans and those who have fallen in love with Action-Adventure yarns. If this was a first work by a new author, I would be much more charitable, but there are problems here for the more critical reader.
Things I liked: There is a lot to like. The writing is excellent, by a man who is a pro at his craft. The overall plot is plausible. There is no arcane secret that threatens the final apocalypse; no madman who plots throwing the earth from its orbit to a final Gotterdammerung. It is a story of terrorists, dirty wars, and warriors who are scarred in body and mind. The main protagonist, Alexander Kurbsky, is a believable anti-hero, and most of the other supporting cast seem like real people, with motives that seem credible and consistent, with notable exceptions. The editing is good, as you would expect from a major publisher.
Things I did not like: There were some puzzling slips in the plot line that defied all reason. The beginning comes to mind. It starts off slowly. Very slowly. I almost quit before Chapter Four. But a more serious problem was a major scene on which the entire plot turned. (This may be a bit of a spoiler!) In a flash-back, Kurbsky is serving as a Russian paratrooper in dirty little war in Chechnya, who is assigned to assassinate General Chelek, the leader of the Chechen guerillas. He is led into a trap and his paratroopers come face-to-face with Chechen troops with machine guns. The action then freezes and Chelek walks boldly out and demands the surrender of Kurbsky and his men. Despite the certainty that their capture would result in their slow death by torture, Kurbsky meekly surrenders. His men tamely acquiesce, also. This exact scene, or something like it, is common in films. But it could not possibly happen in real life. There is no way that Chelek could have imagined that Kurbsky and his men would do anything other than fight for their lives, even if the odds were hopeless. Better death in battle than the alternative! The action would never have frozen. If Kurbsky or any of his men had seen Chelek, their target of the operation, they would have tried to kill him, and Chelek would have known that very well. This entire scene is impossible, and yet it is the major turning point in the novel. It is the “darker place.” I must add that the subsequent plot by Luzhkov, the Russian agent, to blow up four world leaders is almost as incredible, but I suppose an author must be given some artistic license.
I am puzzled at the poorly-written Chelek-Kurbsky scene, since it would have been easy to create something similar that would have been very credible and reflect the nature of men at war in desperate situations where capture is not an option. As it is, the book fails the most basic test of all--does it allow the reader to suspend his disbelief? I think Higgins has become a bit sloppy.
For fans who are willing to accept that this novel has serious flaws, it does provide some escapist entertainment. I can’t recommend it otherwise, and suggest that Jack Higgins’ early works would be preferable.