Reading Bronk's work can be meditative and introspective but there remains a constant sense of detachment. He has modernist influence, but the poems refuse to be within those parameters. Bronk is a writer who is name dropped in a lot of circles as being within the same lineage as a Robert Frost or a Wallace Stevens, but his style (which is oblique and abstract) doesn't seem to fit anywhere in a traditional American canon. His poems are also intuitively incongruous, they don't follow, begin or end in the way that you as a reader would expect. Part of the reason he isn't more appreciated is probably due to these elements. People tend to go to poetry as a way to immerse and to escape and to find clear raw emotion. In Bronk, you get metaphysical unease and complex juxtapositions.
This collection is a fantastic introduction to his work though and the poetry contained is selected by Henry Weinfield. It features a range of different lengths of poetry, different subject matters and covers the entirety of his long career as a writer. What was interesting is that Bronk chose not to be involved in the selection process and so the poems do not reflect the author's favorite pieces.
The preface of this collection notes that his writing has an "astonishing complexity" but also is equally simple in his language. The complexity stems from the way the poems address the reader and the ways in which the words tangle and make knots, especially if read out loud. They often contradict themselves, or have opposites. They are wistful but without purpose since sometimes the words are often not trying to establish a narrative, but rather to create a feeling or impression. For example the poem, "The mind's landscape on an early winter day", you get "perceived by being unperceived" which is a sort of dead end but as a reader you find a way to make sense of it within the context. His poems are like a written pareidolia.
"Seeds and survivals are scattered in all the flaws
of this raw day, even though they are perceived
by being unperceived until the mind
tugs at the senses to remind them. The mind says see."
The poem in its first few lines creates an existential unease in the environment and this is a constant theme of his work as a whole. Perception is limited, we see only what our mind allows us to see. The day is waiting to be filled with the unease of being alive, the raw day.
I always feel like there is an eternalism that exists throughout a lot of his poems. Time is a character and it slows down, gets faster, loses control and so on, in much the same way any other well drawn character is. A good illustration of this is in the poem "The Arts and Death: A fugue for Sidney Cox":
"Death dominates my mind. I
do not stop thinking how time will stop,
how time has stopped, does stop. Those dead-
their done time. Time does us in."
Time has stopped, will stop and does stop. Not only that but it finishes and finally ends us. Notice also how the poem sounds, it just doesn't ring or flow in the expected way. Often the poem is trying to describe as closely as possible a moment or two which in reality exists only for a matter of seconds, such as touching someone, or expressing the short burst of grief at the loss of someone close. The first of these, the touch:
"My hands explore your touch as though your touch
were reality and they explained it. Slow
to learn, they ask it to be explained again.
Again. Or as though they were not quite sure.
of the reality they meant to explain: here
they say, and this, this also, this.
Oh, the reality is this. To explain
is possible. Touch me. I Touch you"
There is a clumsiness in the language, it gives a good translation to the feelings you get in an intimate situation.
Similarly loss is difficult to explain and fully account for, particularly when it occurs in blotches, or bursts. It is repetitive, it is the same gaping hole, the same emptiness. The World is a great place for that expression:
"I thought that you were an anchor in the drift of the world;
but no: there isn't an anchor anywhere
There isn't an anchor in the drift of the world. Oh no
I thought you were: Oh no. The drift of the world"