What do you think?


Human Resource Management
Ivancevich�s Human Resource Management, 10e takes a managerial orientation; that is it takes the position that HRM is relevant to managers in every unit, project, or team. Managers are constantly faced with HRM issues, problems, and decision-making and the text's primary goal is to show how each manager must be a human resource problem solver and diagnostician. This book pays attention to the application of HRM approaches in "real" organizational settings and situations. Realism, understanding, and critical thinking were important in the revision. Students and faculty alike have identified readability and relevance as key strengths of the text. It provides a book that stimulates ideas and keeps all users up-to-date on HRM thinking and practice.
672 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1995
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
April 20, 2009
Helpful, kept my interest in what might have been a difficult task for the subject. Very comprehensive.
March 16, 2018
Great comprehensive accumulation of Human Resources. The adjoining test is very detailed.
December 14, 2020
This builds on the foundations of HRM, if you have read Introduction to Human Resource Management, then this is your next book!
August 24, 2021
I want that
November 12, 2007
This is one of the worst textbooks I have ever had the displeasure of reading, much less paying $158 for--it needs a fact-checker, a copy editor, and an editor. The problem may stem from changes to a previous edition, but it looks like some data was updated and other data was not. Also, the chapter summaries were clearly written by people who did not read the chapters themselves.
Here is a choice excerpt, from page 484:
"If the EU is the standard by which the success of NAFTA must be measured, then NAFTA is a success, especially compared to the EU."
Worst chapters so far: 2, 9, 12, 15.
The author should be embarrassed, as should the publisher.
Here is a choice excerpt, from page 484:
"If the EU is the standard by which the success of NAFTA must be measured, then NAFTA is a success, especially compared to the EU."
Worst chapters so far: 2, 9, 12, 15.
The author should be embarrassed, as should the publisher.
April 16, 2015
Comprehensive, not-too-boring. A bit outdated in terms of research used. Overall - easy and useful read.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews





