I thought the book would finally provide a case for uniformitarian geology, but in the end, it was just an exposition of it. There were several times while reading this when I thought, "Finally a defense of their method!" In the end, I was disappointed.
At one point after a lengthy exposition of the perspective of flood geologists, the authors wrote, "By comparing modern processes of sedimentation with the evidences in the sedimentary rock record, geologists have concluded that Earth must be far older than was assumed three hundred years ago" (218). The problem, of course, is that this is exactly what is up for grabs. Why should we do geology that way and not some other?
Again, uniformitarianism is assumed throughout and never defended. Even in the chapter which was written about the philosophy of Uniformitarianism, the view is simply stated. The problem is that their view of geology is exactly the point of disagreement.
The book is also characterized by an underestimation of the role of worldview in scientific investigation--specifically James Hutton's.
Their interaction with opposing views amounts to mere dismissal. At one point, after explaining their interpretation of a particular mineral deposit, they explain the flood geologists' point of view. Without any meaningful interaction, the authors write, "Do Flood geologists really expect anyone to believe that?" (378)
The authors' disdain for flood geologists is clear. Here are just a few things Young and Stearley say about those who disagree with them:
They hide behind a "façade of scientific sophistication" (23).
Efforts of flood geologists are "detrimental to the health of the church and the cause of Christ." (474)
They "indoctrinate" children (476).
They advocate "pseudo-science" (477; 480; 492), "scientific nonsense" (477), or "bogus science" (478) which is "useless apologetically" (478) and "a hindrance to evangelism" (478). Ultimately, they say, flood geology "has nothing to do with the real world" (494).
Also, because I am convinced by the arguments of flood geologists, I "dwell in appalling gross darkness" (22). That's my favorite one.
These guys write with all the vitriol of a nineteen-year-old discernment blogger.
I suspect that this book will be bought many more times than it will be read. It does look impressive. Having a five hundred page book by two PhD geologists on your shelf can make someone feel secure in his belief. The problem is that this book has words.
I have many other notes, but I will end this review here. For a study of how presuppositions drive inquiry and the fallacy of pretended neutrality, check out Jason Lisle's "The Ultimate Proof of Creation" or Greg Bahnsen's "Always Ready." For a book that addresses the biblical arguments of Young and Stearley, read "As It is Written" by Kenneth Gentry.