What do you think?
Rate this book


336 pages, Hardcover
Published January 14, 2020
At the time that NAFTA was signed, there were a number of good strategic reasons for its passage that would prove beneficial to America and Americans over the long run. Realizing those benefits would hurt factory workers in many communities, we did not allow ourselves to be honest about the deal we were making—we glossed over the losses, and, later, turned around and pointed fingers. We could have done better, and we should have.Next the book has a chapter addressing various economic myths. I've selected short excerpts that summarize the book's position regarding the myth. However, some of the best illustrations of the myths not being true occur in the examples given later in the book.
... the reality is that America has intentionally ceded ground under his [Trump's] watch. Leaving the Trans-Pacific Partnership is the clearest demonstration of how America has walked away from a leadership role in global trade—we have abandoned our historic role of writing the rules of the road. … Globally, everyone agrees that we want China to be a better actor, engaging in trade in ways that are more consistent with other industrialized nations. Up to now, the U.S. has done this in partnership with allies, and has provided leadership to guide the way. Under Donald Trump, the preference has been for America to go it alone (without pesky allies who might muddy things up) by using tariffs rather than joint action as the chief tool for influencing China.Myth #2: Bilateral Trade Deficits Matter
But a trade deficit is something else entirely: it simply describes the difference between the value of goods and services a country imports and the value of the things that it exports. Importing more from a given country than we export to it is not a measure of strength, weakness, solvency, fiscal irresponsibility, or anything else—nor is our money "lost" when we do so.Myth #3: Tariffs Are Paid by Foreigners
In a world where services such as software, movies, television, music, banking, insurance, transportation, and education are becoming much more strategically valuable to economic growth than the number of goods we can produce in a factory, a trade deficit on physical goods simply shouldn't bother us.
Tariffs, by their very definition, are a sales tax that a country imposes on its own consumers and importers for buying foreign goods—when the U.S. creates them, they get paid by U.S. citizens to the U.S. government, full stop. There's no debating this point; it's just a fact.Myth #4: Trade Agreements Are All About Jobs
As economies—and, especially, America's economy—have evolved to center more around services than physical goods, businesses in fields ranging from finance and law to marketing and entertainment have set their eyes on the vast majority of potential customers who happen to live beyond their own national borders. Because the rules of trade were largely written during eras when services were little more than a blip on the economic radar, a major goal of new trade agreements like TPP is opening the same doors to consultants, cloud service providers, IT support, and engineers that we've already opened to steel mills and lumberyards.Myth #5: Trade Wars Work
I am pleased to report that trade wars are nowhere near as devastating as actual wars. That isn't to say that they don't also have victims, though—on the contrary, the major difference between trade wars and actual wars is that trade wars typically don't have winners.Myth #6: The Less We Import, the Better Off We Are
An America that makes everything at home would be a land of $10 bananas, $100 shirts, and a diet limited by what's available season to season. You wouldn't have an iPhone to distract you or a laptop to stream TV.Myth #7: Trade Is Win-Win
... that even the best intentioned deals are always going to leave somebody behind.Myth #8: Everything Donald Trump Says About Trade Is Wrong:
By and large, globalization has helped three categories of people: rich people in rich countries, rich people in poor countries, and poor people in poor countries. What we have not done well is make globalization a winning proposition for poor people in rich countries. … President Trump is right about the impact trade has had on many segments of our population as well as lower-income workers in developed countries around the worldThe rest of the book examines six products that make the case for free trade. These products are; (1) taco salad, (2) Honda Odyssey, (3) banana, (4) iPhone, (5) college degree, and (6) HBO series Game of Thrones.
Behind these six items are meaningful stories that help explain not only how trade has shaped our lives so far, but also how we can use trade to build a better future for our own families, for America, and for the world.In case you're wondering why the Honda Odyssey is a product of worthy note, a 2018 analysis of part origins and assembly locations showed that the Honda Odyssey was the most American car—i.e. had the highest "made-in-America" rating. (The definition of "American" in this analysis performed by the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration [NHTSA] combines Canadian and USA origins because it's too difficult to separate those two.)