What do you think?
Rate this book


288 pages, Paperback
First published April 16, 2019
What does the concept of "today" mean when every day lasts for 5,000 years and contains dozens of the dumbest things that have ever occurred
— Anna Merlan (@annamerlan) May 16, 2017
Conspiracy theories tend to flourish especially at times of rapid social change, when we're reevaluating ourselves and, perhaps, facing uncomfortable questions in the process. In 1980, the civil liberties lawyer and author Frank Donner wrote that conspiracism reveals a fundamental insecurity about who Americans want to be versus who we are.Well, one need only look to religions to see the same thing.
And surely, in part, some of these services are hamstrung by a grim, darkly funny logical endpoint: Trump is the best-known political figure on earth to use social media to spread conspiracy theories. Any banning policy would, in the end, have to cover him, too.Yep. Of course, the Twit-ter lets him violate their abuse policies incessantly, so don't hold any breaths.
"I mean, they were burning women at the stake four hundred years ago, long before the Internet Facebook didn't tell them to do it." He points out, too, that the number of people who visit conspiracy sites is far lower than those who visit non-conspiratorial, traditional news sites. "There's tons of everything on the Internet," he said. "When I put in the words 'duck confit recipe,' I get half a million recipes. But nobody's racing home to cook duck confit. Just because it's there doesn't mean anyone cares. The things people look at are things they're predisposed to look."Nailed it. And she continued: "More important, Facebook and Twitter have a way of flattening information, making every source look the same or appear equally plausible." There lies a problem with our anti-social media...they feed, we can skip, but not unsee.
Uscinski's position doesn't take into account the role of social media, however. Through Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube, more and more people who might not be predisposed to reading about the Clinton body count or pedophiles in the pizza parlor will nevertheless run across tha content.
Countering an idea that has taken root is incredibly hard. Studies suggest that trying to argue someone out of a conspiratorial belief does not work, likening conspiracy theories to religious faith, which helps us see how they can be similarly fixed in the mind.So true. She also observes that we cannot just label something as fake and turn away, because "millions of people across the country are not doing the same." Take one look at a certain "News" Channels ratings and you'll see what she means (my words.)She quotes reporter Sarah Jones, writing for the New RepublicThe alternative is to allow conservative propaganda to fester. An impenetrable bloc of voters will continue to blame Latinos for their woes, to ignore basic facts that are staring them in the face, to trumpet American exceptionalism while neo-Nazis roam the streets, and to look to a strongman in their image to save them. We will have an unfree country, ruled by fear, and if we do not act we will bear some of the responsibility."