Even worse.
This book is a sequel to the now famous “property finance”, and has the ambition to go deeper within the lore, and expand the stakes of the plot.
The first one was terrible. It lacked depth, world building, emotions, and an engaging writing. But I let myself be tempted to give our authors another chance. After all, with how deceptive the promising first part was, it could only be better. I was wrong.
We take the story right after the events of the first one, and the main characters remain unchanged. “The borrower” is still by far my favorite one, the og, while “creditor” the hero of the first tome, takes a step back to let “Property” shine. As a matter of fact, It is an Eponymous book.
Without spoiling too much, the new nemesis here is “overvaluation” (some could argue its “depreciation”, but my take is that he is also a victim after all) and, while less impressive and overpowered compared to “the risk”, portrayed in the first opus, I appreciated the more insidious and complexity of this one.
But, to be fair, it is probably the only positive point about the book.
Indeed, the story is endless, with so much artificial addition just to gain some pages. The whole arc about “rates” (a useless sidekick) is painful, and even some parts are full flashbacks, unmodified, from the first book. Such mistakes were acceptable in a first one, now it clearly screams amateurism. Some more detailed explanation on “fiscal fraud”, on the way he managed to stay undetected for so long in the first part, would have proven more engaging.
The love story between “Land” and “Building” is rushed, they just mysteriously engage in a relationship from nowhere, unexplained, after the first chapter, to justify the launch of the Valuation Quest. (Spoiler : Only to find out in the end that the true valuation is the friends we made along the way)
Bottom line, it is definitely the last book I’m reading from this series. If it continues in this downward slope, even my goat “borrower” will be butchered and start going out with “negatives rates”. It’s just qualitative easing at this point.