What do you think?
Rate this book
Popular Culture and Philosophy #129
RuPaul's Drag Race and Philosophy: Sissy That Thought
As RuPaul has said, this is the Golden Age of Drag--and that's chiefly the achievement of RuPaul's Drag Rac, /i>e, which in its eleventh year is more popular than ever, and has now become fully mainstream in its appeal. The show has an irresistible allure for folks of all persuasions and proclivities. Yet serious or philosophical discussion of its exponential success has been rare. Now at last we have RuPaul's Drag Race and Philosophy, shining the light on all dimensions of this amazing theories of gender construction and identity, interpretations of RuPaul's famous quotes and phrases, the paradoxes of reality shows, the phenomenology of the drag queen, and how the fake becomes the truly authentic. Among the thought-provoking issues examined in this path-breaking and innovative
● What Should a Queen Do? Marta Sznajder looks at RuPaul's Drag Race from the perspective of rationality. Where contestants have to eliminate each other, the prisoner's dilemma and other well-known situations emerge.
● Reading Is Fundamental! Lucy McAdams analyzes two different, important speech acts that regularly appear on Drag Race--reading and throwing shade.
● The Values of Drag Race. Guilel Treiber observes two competing sets of values being presented in Drag Race. The more openly advertised "charisma, uniqueness, nerve, and talent," advancing the skills of every single contender, are opposed by the fading set of "acceptance, support, solidarity, and empowerment," which has historically been the cornerstone of the LGBTI+ community.
● The Importance of Being Fabulous. Holly Onclin challenges the preconceived notion that drag queens are mainly about female impersonation and instead proposes to understand drag queens as impersonators of celebrity.
● RuPaul Is a Better Warhol. Megan Volpert compares RuPaul and Andy Warhol in their shared pursuit of realness.
● Is Reading Someone to Filth Allowed? Rutger Birnie asks whether there are ethical restrictions on reading someone, since reads are ultimately insults and could cause harm.
● Serving Realness? Dawn Gilpin and Peter Nagy approach the concept of realness in Drag Race, to discuss the differences between realness, authenticity and the nature of being.
● Death Becomes Her. Hendrik Kempt explores the topic of death both in philosophy and in Drag Race, starting from the claim that "Philosophy is training for death."
● We're All Born Naked. Oliver Norman follows up on Ru's mantra, "We are all born naked and the rest is drag."
● Fire Werk with Me. Carolina Are looks into the fan-subcultures of Drag Race and Twin Peaks, which have come together to form a unique sub-subculture, in which members of both fan-subcultures create memes and idiosyncrasies.
● Towards a Healthier Subjectivity? Ben Glaister looks at the way Drag Race contestants adopt their drag personae almost as second selves, without finding themselves violating their other self.
● RuPaul versus Zarathustra. Julie and Alice van der Wielen ask the question, Who would win an intellectual lip-sync battle--RuPaul or Nietzsche's Zarathustra?
● Playing with Glitter? Fernando Pagnoni and pals explore the game and play elements of Drag Race.
● The Origins of Self-Love. Anna Fennell expounds upon RuPaul's question, "If you can't love yourself, how in the hell you gonna love somebody else?"
● The Sublime. Sandra Ryan thinks about Kant's concept of the sublime and explores how we find its applications in Drag Race.
● You Want to Be Anonymous? You Better Work! Alice Fox watches Drag Race through the lens of criminal law and the problem of decreasing anonymity through ubiquitous data surveillance. Drag Race can teach us how to create misleading patterns of online behavior and public presentation to render the blackbox persona useless.
● Drag and Vulnerability. Anneliese Cooper contrasts Drag Race's demand for vulnerability and perceived authenticity with the inherent inauthenticity of creating a new persona.
● What Should a Queen Do? Marta Sznajder looks at RuPaul's Drag Race from the perspective of rationality. Where contestants have to eliminate each other, the prisoner's dilemma and other well-known situations emerge.
● Reading Is Fundamental! Lucy McAdams analyzes two different, important speech acts that regularly appear on Drag Race--reading and throwing shade.
● The Values of Drag Race. Guilel Treiber observes two competing sets of values being presented in Drag Race. The more openly advertised "charisma, uniqueness, nerve, and talent," advancing the skills of every single contender, are opposed by the fading set of "acceptance, support, solidarity, and empowerment," which has historically been the cornerstone of the LGBTI+ community.
● The Importance of Being Fabulous. Holly Onclin challenges the preconceived notion that drag queens are mainly about female impersonation and instead proposes to understand drag queens as impersonators of celebrity.
● RuPaul Is a Better Warhol. Megan Volpert compares RuPaul and Andy Warhol in their shared pursuit of realness.
● Is Reading Someone to Filth Allowed? Rutger Birnie asks whether there are ethical restrictions on reading someone, since reads are ultimately insults and could cause harm.
● Serving Realness? Dawn Gilpin and Peter Nagy approach the concept of realness in Drag Race, to discuss the differences between realness, authenticity and the nature of being.
● Death Becomes Her. Hendrik Kempt explores the topic of death both in philosophy and in Drag Race, starting from the claim that "Philosophy is training for death."
● We're All Born Naked. Oliver Norman follows up on Ru's mantra, "We are all born naked and the rest is drag."
● Fire Werk with Me. Carolina Are looks into the fan-subcultures of Drag Race and Twin Peaks, which have come together to form a unique sub-subculture, in which members of both fan-subcultures create memes and idiosyncrasies.
● Towards a Healthier Subjectivity? Ben Glaister looks at the way Drag Race contestants adopt their drag personae almost as second selves, without finding themselves violating their other self.
● RuPaul versus Zarathustra. Julie and Alice van der Wielen ask the question, Who would win an intellectual lip-sync battle--RuPaul or Nietzsche's Zarathustra?
● Playing with Glitter? Fernando Pagnoni and pals explore the game and play elements of Drag Race.
● The Origins of Self-Love. Anna Fennell expounds upon RuPaul's question, "If you can't love yourself, how in the hell you gonna love somebody else?"
● The Sublime. Sandra Ryan thinks about Kant's concept of the sublime and explores how we find its applications in Drag Race.
● You Want to Be Anonymous? You Better Work! Alice Fox watches Drag Race through the lens of criminal law and the problem of decreasing anonymity through ubiquitous data surveillance. Drag Race can teach us how to create misleading patterns of online behavior and public presentation to render the blackbox persona useless.
● Drag and Vulnerability. Anneliese Cooper contrasts Drag Race's demand for vulnerability and perceived authenticity with the inherent inauthenticity of creating a new persona.
239 pages, Kindle Edition
Published December 3, 2019
21 people are currently reading
138 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews
July 27, 2020
Zarathustra? I just met her!
November 20, 2023
Goffman? Shantay you stay
Combining two of my favourite things, I adored this - as with any collection of essays, the quality is not infallible , I don’t think I ever want to see the phrase ‘we are born naked and the rest is drag’ again, but on the whole I devoured this
Combining two of my favourite things, I adored this - as with any collection of essays, the quality is not infallible , I don’t think I ever want to see the phrase ‘we are born naked and the rest is drag’ again, but on the whole I devoured this
February 24, 2021
This was an okay book. I think you'd have to be a bigger fan(? Perhaps not the right word but you get what I mean) of philosophy to get more out of it instead of only enjoying Drag Race but I still got some stuff out of it. I thought it was interesting how a lot of concepts you read in a Philosophy class in school can have Drag Race parallels. I liked the Fire Werk With Me chapter.
June 11, 2020
A book from leeches trying to both take some of the spot light of a very popular show and push their own petty agendas.
April 28, 2023
Much heavier than expected and a bit repetitive at times
May 8, 2024
Some are great (the first two and the last two), and others did not impress
Unlike Plato, I do like to laugh, so loved the jokes!
Unlike Plato, I do like to laugh, so loved the jokes!
October 7, 2024
Some excellent, some way beyond me.
April 10, 2025
Was an alright read some interesting tidbits but seemed to hash out more for people not fans of the show so that made it sluggish
August 22, 2025
**read in response to PS reading challenge prompt “a book about chosen family”**
March 11, 2020
I give #RuPaulsDragRaceandPhilosophy 🌈🦄💪 out of 5 related objects.
.
This book took me a while to get through, its readable and interesting but I really feel it could have done with another run through the editors before publishing, there are multiple errors; grammatical, spelling and incorrect quotes or information that should have been easily fixed.
.
That's being said seeing seeing Drag Race in the mainstream and in books that analyse pop culture is really nice!
.
Reviews are taken from my #bookstagram posts on Instagram
.
This book took me a while to get through, its readable and interesting but I really feel it could have done with another run through the editors before publishing, there are multiple errors; grammatical, spelling and incorrect quotes or information that should have been easily fixed.
.
That's being said seeing seeing Drag Race in the mainstream and in books that analyse pop culture is really nice!
.
Reviews are taken from my #bookstagram posts on Instagram
September 6, 2021
It's hard rating this because, being a collection of essays from multiple authors, it is expected that the style and quality will vary quite a bit. One on them was particularly bad, falling into incohesive self-help bullshit. Although it should have gone through some more post-editing (I'm not even talking about the typos), it was overall very interesting and I was able to understand a lot of new concepts.
August 23, 2023
It took me a while to finish this book, simply because I wasn’t prepared to read something so academic. Truthfully, I feel smarter. It does help to understand the references, especially when questioning whether we are all born naked and the rest is drag. I sped through the last half and I have no regrets. Drag Race and Philosophy? Shantay, you stay.
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews