I received a free Kindle copy of this book in exchange for an honest review. I confess that this is the only reason I finished it.
For those of you who, like me, were left mystified by the synopsis of this book and don't know what it's about, here's a quick summary:
An orthodox Jew and a Celtic warrior queen cross paths some few decades after the death of Jesus Christ. Together they fight against the brutalities of Roman oppression, while also Coming to Jesus™ and navigating a lot of really uncomfortable romantic(?) tension.
I disliked this book tremendously, and I'll tell you why:
1) Telling, Not Showing
One issue I saw over and over again was a serious case of telling-not-showing. The author, rather than giving descriptive details and clues that will show the reader what's happening and allow them to infer what's going on in the characters' heads, just tells it outright. Examples:
". . .Ben was also confronting his increasing doubts about the rigorous exercise of his faith." (pg 17)
". . .he uttered as his mind began to evaluate the possibilities and determine his potential to react effectively given the most lethal outcome." (pg 23
"I'm feeling intense exhilaration." (dialogue from pg 51)
"I'm shocked and confused." (dialogue from pg 59)
"He felt gratification with the progress made thus far." (pg 97)
"'What is that?' Fiona inquired, obviously interested and ready to hear Ben's revelation." (pg 315)
2) Clunky, Unnatural Dialogue
In addition to the telling-not-showing issue, the dialogue in this story constantly feels unnatural. The author tends to use dialogue as a tool to dump large loads of exposition onto the reader, resulting in absurdly long sentences and characters that sound like textbooks. Examples:
"We owe you an apology for the way we urged you to reveal the intensely sensitive information you finally divulged." -pg 46
". . . rather than strict obesrvance and meticulous adherence to the many details of Hebrew laws and traditions that have evolved dramatically over time, as our faith progressed in the hands and works of men." -pg 53
". . .Then came the Babylonians who took many of our people back to their homeland where Abraham was born. And the Persians eventually conquered Babylon. By then, our people were scattered, even before the Greeks came. And now many are fleeing from the Romans who call what is left of our homeland Palestina. It's all very interesting." -pg 77 (Note: This was spoken by a Jew, to another Jew, who was just as familiar with Jewish history as he was.)
"I know you've been anxious to hear more about your status and why we're working so diligently to bring you into our culture in a way that might enable you to go beyond mere survival in the constantly changing situation we're struggling to overcome." -pg 122
The characters in this story also have a habit of narrating their actions in a way that nobody ever does:
"It looks like we've found a Roman encampment. Let's dismount and crawl forward to take a closer look." (pg 140)
And, while we're on the subject of dialogue, the author appears to have an addiction to dialogue tags. They are used so frequently that it creates an almost comic effect, especially the random shouts, yells, and screams that come out of nowhere:
"'What a grand moment that will be!' Kale shouted." (pg 143)
". . . added Ben with a questioning gesture." (pg 54)
"'Amen! Amen!' Ben shouted in response, raising his arms and holding them high above his head, his eyes on the sky." (pg 80)
"'Excellent!' Ben shouted." (pg 261)
"'It must be Verulamium,' Ben uttered." (pg 260)
3) Abrupt Scene Jumps
Another frequent issue I ran into was scene jumps that came out of nowhere, with little to no indication that time had passed or that the setting had changed. And often, those jumps skipped over major action that was then referred to later. It felt lazy, as though the actor didn't feel like writing the actual scene, so he just skipped it and gave us a brief summary of what happened.
For example, the first two or three pages of the book are spent giving the reader an info-dump about the protagonist, Ben, and his history and family life. Very suddenly, the paragraph ends and the next one begins with Ben crawling through darkness looking for water after his wife has been hanged by Roman soldiers. Not a bad way to begin the story, but it feels extremely abrupt after the massive amount of exposition I had to wade through to get there (exposition, by the way, is a tool the author relies very heavily on).
Another example occurs when the other main character, Boudica, has met up with some members of another tribe of Celts. The author skips over their actual conversation, missing an opportunity to further develop the characters and their relationship, and gives us this paragraph instead:
"After much discussion, the old man and Boudica reached an understanding of the common interest they shared, then came to a mutually agreeable set of terms for planning and decisive action to counter the threat presented by the Romans." (pg 60)
4) Distant Narration
That brings me to my fourth issue. A good novel should thoroughly immerse the reader in the story, making you feel as though you're right there with the characters, watching it all happen. But I just didn't get that from this book. It felt like the author was holding me at arm's length, like I was looking through a window or a TV screen rather than experiencing the events of the story firsthand. I think this was in large part due to the amount of telling, but there was also issues with the style of narration. Examples:
"A full moon's journey north from Benjamin's oasis in Palestine. . . a woman was also fighting to free herself from the darkness surrounding her plight." (pg 21)
"She was about to face her hated enemies, the bloodthirsty Trinovantes!" (pg 37)
There's a lot of gruesome violence in this story, but because I felt so disconnected with the narrative, none of it had the effect on my emotions that I think it was intended to.
5) The Religious Elements
Okay, before I dive into this one, I need to offer this preface: I am religious. I am a very devout Christian who absolutely loves Jesus and loves talking about Jesus and would gladly read about people who come to Jesus. But that concept just wasn't executed very well here. I think it was the combination of all the issues I've already described, but each character's respective conversion to Christianity felt very forced and unnatural. The conversion process was rushed, and the author failed to show us sufficient emotions in his characters so as to make it believable.
In addition, the Christianity presented in this story stood in major contrast to the constant violence going on, leading to inconsistent characterization and borderline hypocrisy. For example, after meeting some of Jesus's disciples, Ben decides to become a disciple himself. He takes some scriptural documents and epistles and boards a boat, intending to go on a journey to help others learn about and accept Christ. But while on that boat, they are attacked by pirates, and Ben goes on a murderous rampage:
"Ben charged, driving the point of his dagger into the man's left eye and burying the blade up to its hilt. The pirate's body collapsed beneath him and went limp as Ben continued to plunge his dagger into a lifeless face, until it became a bloody pulp." (pg 99)
He then goes on to laugh about his actions with another character. Not quite the behavior you'd expect from a recent convert to the peaceful, loving lifestyle promoted by the Christians. It happens again and again throughout the book as Ben encounters and battles Romans. This scene from page 132 captures my sentiments quite nicely:
"Ben secured his sword, dismounted and returned to his saddle with the severed head in one hand. . . Kale met Ben with a look of amazement.
'You've confounded me, Benjamin. Not long ago, you spoke about peace and hope and love for our fellow man. What would your Christ say about you now, after watching the spectacle of your rage, your wild riding, your killing, and your obvious rebellion against his words?'"
My thoughts exactly, Kale. And this was Ben's response: "Kale, my madness came from love."
Hm.
6) Romantic/Sexual Subplots
There were soooo many issues in this department. The first and foremost for me is that there is a love triangle between Ben, Boudica, and BOUDICA'S 17-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER. Ben, by the way is nearly 30. And every attempt of the author to develop the feelings Ben had for both these characters came across creepy and gross:
"'Have you been struck dumb at the sight of a warrior's breasts?'
'Yes,' Ben responded, averting his eyes." (pg 113, Boudica)
". . .with a sensuous, catlike smile." (pg 114, Boudica)
"When Ben withdrew in further avoidance, Boudica shifted her position and leaned forward until he could feel the warmth of her breasts." (pg 117, Boudica)
"Ben could see she was much more than a girl. . . . Her green eyes surveyed him with a wanton gaze." (pg 150, Fiona)
"Ben could not take his eyes off Fiona's muscular, long lets and petite bare feet." (pg 151, Fiona)
There's a whole scene where Ben mentally compares Fiona to the harlots he used to see in Jerusalem and then admits to himself that "Fiona might be hard to resist." (pg 157)
"From adoration to sinful desire, his feelings and emotions raced wildly during every close encounter with Boudica." (pg 157, Boudica--note that this is the same page as the previous example where he was lusting after HER DAUGHTER).
There's plenty more examples I could cite, but we'll leave it at that. At one point in the story, Boudica implies that she and Ben will sleep together at one point, but tells him she wants to wait until they've been united according to the rules of his faith. But only a few pages later, Fiona (Boudica's daughter) sneaks up on Ben as he's journeying ahead and attacks him from behind. At some point in the ensuing struggle, they end up having sex. Fiona asks him afterward if she caused Ben to sin by doing that with him. His response? "How could this be a sin?" -_- He then mentally refers to her as a "lovely child of God."
Oh, and let's not forget this scene, just a few paragraphs later...
"When Fiona opened her mouth to shout out her anger, Ben recovered quickly and ran toward her. Before she could react, he grabbed her slender waist with both hands and lifted her up as high as he could, then lowered her while braving vicious kicks and pounding with fists until her pursed lips and extended jaw were level with his. Then he pulled her closer, until their lips met. His kiss was tender. Fiona's protests were silenced. As her flailing limbs went limp, Ben loosened his grip." (pg 245)
Not romantic. Not at all. This is gross, this is creepy, this is borderline rapey.
And even after all this, he still continues to harbor thoughts about Fiona's mother. Until Boudica finds out about what happened, and then we get this weirdness:
"She's more than fond of you, Ben. She knows about us. When she saw how you ran to me yesterday, she knew. Her hope vanished. My mother realized she would no longer have you in the way she wanted, in the way she had dreamed and desired." (Fiona to Ben, pg 278)
"I wanted you...I grew in love...wanting you as my husband. Now...you'll be my son." (Boudica to Ben, pg 300).
Everything about this whole love triangle just felt so wrong to me, and it was a major turn-off.
7) Philosophy/Preachiness
My final problem with this book was that the author frequently interrupted the already-weak narrative to insert some giant, thinky piece of philosophy or religious preaching (as already stated, I am very religious myself, but the way it was inserted didn't fit into the story well at all). Examples:
"'And there was a message in that,' Ben interjected. 'As long as we keep our eyes on Jesus and trust him, we can navigate the stormy waters of this life and follow his example of true love into the next life, just as Jesus has already done...and you have witnessed!'" (pg 73)
"In my case, it began with the story of Creation, how we, and all we sense, came into being presented in simple ways that rational minds can understand and accept without further proof." (pg 184)
There were some other things I didn't like about this book, as well, such as the implication at the end of the book that the United States of America is the peak of human potential, the ready willingness with which many characters abandoned their heritage and cultural identities, the abundance of random italics...
Final Thoughts:
My impression was that this author wanted to write a profound commentary about cultural identity, oppression and imperialism, and Christianity, and he attempted to layer all of this within a fictional narrative. Unfortunately, in my opinion, he failed. The narrative is not compelling or engaging (I skimmed the majority of the book). The writing is weak in terms of dialogue, narration, and character development. I felt like I was being lectured and preached at for most of the story.
I didn't like this book and would not recommend it to anyone. My apologies, Francis Audrain.