It’s clear our culture is obsessed with dystopia (as our present moment certainly is saturated with parallel situations), but I think this obsession also implies an obsession with Utopia. It is the flip side of the coin that rarely gets considered.
Mayer considers it. She chews it, spits it out, composts it, and after all of that: it turns into some beautiful garden of wildflowers. It’s the perfect example of how poetics are constantly emergent within politics, and perhaps more so, how poetry can serve as a liaison to imagined futures.
Most striking is the loose narrative woven throughout of all landlords being evicted in the utopia and made to live as tenants. It’s comical at some points (someone suggests they live on the moon and have to pay rent for air😂), and at other points it becomes a radical exploration of what the redistribution of wealth might look like.
Interwoven in this imagined utopia, it’s easy to see that most folks are queer, most children are raised communally, markets are non-existent, and the biggest concerns most people handle in their daily lives are cooking (often quite delicious food), cleaning, and community “work” for others.
Of course, it is all a little tongue in cheek—what utopia isn’t? There are parts that expose the desire for a “utopia” as a farce in itself.
But it’s important to note that this utopia (be it a farce or a sincerity) was generated with (and by) women, lower class folks, artists, and workers. It doesn’t come from the pen of a Sir Thomas Moore—it is a lived imagination, a “real” fiction. And that is, perhaps, somewhere to start.