What do you think?
Rate this book


544 pages, Hardcover
First published June 27, 2012
This was the worst book that I read in 2015 (yep, my review is late). It was incredibly boring, and there were so many times that I became frustrated with Kate Hanson, the main character. My brother’s girlfriend leant it to me but didn’t tell me that she had only got a couple of chapters in before giving up on it until after I had ploughed through it. I did have to tell her that it did get a little more interesting later on, but not enough for me to rate it higher than 2 stars.
Kate Hanson is a forensic psychologist (as is the author) who is called in to help in the investigation of a murdered teenager who went missing years prior. She works alongside a small police task force and does an awful lot of policing herself. Though of course, if she only had the input into the case that forensic psychologists do in the real world, then there would not have been as much of a story, so I will let that slide. There were many twists in the book and only right near the end did we find out who the killer was. One of the book’s only redeeming qualities was that I didn’t figure out who the murderer was until just before it was revealed (I think everyone would have figured it out at that point).
The plot of the book was interesting but unfortunately the writing was not and I found it quite a dull book. I’ve seen a lot of mixed reviews of this book in regards to how gripping it was so I guess Cross’s writing only worked for some. I unfortunately was not one of them. None of the characters really stood out to me and I didn’t feel any connection to any of them, not really caring what their fates were. For me, connecting to a character is very important and here, it just did not happen.
Now for the things that made me want to throw the book at the wall. Right near the beginning Kate it teaching a class and puts up photos of ‘victims’ and photos of ‘predators.’ All the victims were female and all the predators were male. Yes, in the particular sort of crime she was looking at, the majority of the time it was males that were the predators and females were the victims but not 100% of the time and this was what it seemed to be suggesting to me. I don’t know whether it was intended to come across that way but it did rather annoy me. There was not one point throughout the book that it suggested that it was ever the other way around.
What irked me even more was the main character. She was supposed to be a forensic psychologist who had a lot of experience with violent crime, yet she would miss things that were blatantly obvious and when things started happening around her own house she never questioned them. It came across to me that she didn’t have the experience she was supposed to have.
So yeh, I was not all that impressed with this book. I don’t intend to read the others in the series and do not recommend it to anyone. I think that the only reason I hung on until the end was due to the plot which was not bad, it was just let down by the writing and the characters.