Takeouts:
- Economics of attention.
- Radical simplicity (not that I'm think highly of this concept).
- Timeless primordia laws of human attention.
Downsides:
- Repetition. Repetition. Repetition. In all seriousness, we got that there be dilution the first time around!
- Some of the referenced info is plain old false.
Other goodies:
Q:
With my background in economic history, I set out to see if there were in fact patterns of iconic communication. Was there an economics of attention? What makes some things imprint in the mind while other things are repelled? What causes any business, science, art, idea, or message to stand out and become iconic? (c)
Q:
This book is a handbook to achieve radical simplicity. And these days, it is only simplicity that gets attention. (c) Which's saddish.
Q:
The Iconist centers around the concept of Icons and Blocks, which are similar ideas, but with a key distinction. A Block is a succinct, clear, bold, monolithic image, statement, melody, physical structure, or piece of design. Throughout the book we’ll explore examples, but what makes a Block a Block is that it can be immediately understood by any onlooker. By definition, a Block has not yet taken hold in the mind of the viewer or audience. It is an Icon in the making or an Icon about to happen. With consistent, deliberate, and up-front repetition, the Block grabs attention, stands out, and imprints itself in the minds of those you are trying to reach. In fact, if done correctly, it gives your intended audience no choice. That is when your Block becomes an Icon—once it has been accepted and imprinted in the minds of others. (c)
Q:
To become a successful Iconist you have to understand and believe that standing out is equal to if not more important than talent, at least as far as widespread success is concerned. History is littered with hardworking, brilliant people who died unknown and with pennies in their pockets because they did not find a way for their talents to be seen. (c)
Q:
Dan Henderson, one of his closest friends and a former world champion MMA fighter, said in an interview, “I guess I should just quit training to win fights . . . and go to shit talking school.” Fighters and championship contenders Phil Davis and Shane Carwin echoed the sentiment, coming forward to say that they would attend that school. (c)
Q:
Imagine you’re part of one of the first civilizations—a people who developed the first languages and built some of the first free-standing structures. Where did your quest for understanding begin? Where did your knowledge come from? What were you trying to emulate? That which you saw already perfect and working in the world around you. (c)
Q:
People become professionals and create companies to solve problems. Problems are, by nature, emotional. The key is to understand that no matter what you have to do or say, your job is solving a problem for someone, and that’s going to be emotional. Listen to those you are trying to convince. (c)
Q:
Our technology-induced expectation of being able to check any claim or review—anywhere at any time—makes us all now expect transparency. And when we don’t get it, we feel insulted. It is the same expectation, created by instant, real-time, ubiquitous access and sharing, that launched the Arab Spring in 2009. Here, the lack of transparency by corrupt regimes was unveiled by instant access to information, in real time, by everyone, anywhere, across almost any geography. Nearly all of the protests in this movement were organized on Facebook and Twitter, just a click away from where you read your Yelp restaurant reviews. What the Arab Spring proved is that when people irrefutably know they are being exploited and manipulated, in real time, they will risk death fighting to free themselves from the yoke of oppressive rule. Smartphones and social sharing embolden us to seek, share, and expect the truth. (c) Actually, no. That's false info.