2 Stars for SHANGRI-LA by Christopher Cartwright, narrated by David Gilmore. This is a mostly Clean* novel that may be enjoyed most by YA Action-Adventure readers.
MY RATING GUIDE:
1= dnf/What was that?; 2= NOPE; NOT FOR ME/US; 3=This was okay/cute; 3.5= I enjoyed it; 4= I liked it a lot; 5= I Loved it, it was great! (I seldom give 5 Stars).
Shangri-La, 1931 ~
An aircraft carrying 2 passengers crash lands in the mountains of India with only one survivor who ultimately discovers Shangri-la.
Present day ~
Sam Reilly, his cohort Tom Bower and friends are drawn into a search for Shangri-La.
My husband and I enjoy listening to novels on audio with our morning coffee. We have enjoyed a number of Action-Adventure novels together (he’s a history buff, motor-head, science-type guy) and I prefer fast action, great adventures, creative world building with honorable and sometimes complicated characters. Our past successful “reads” have been Relic/Pendergast series, #1 by Preston & Child; Import/Matthew Riker series, #1 by J Snyder; Final Cut/Brit in FBI series, #1 by C Coulter & Ellingson; Lion in the Valley/Amelia Peabody series, #4 by E Peters; Raja’s Lost Adventure/Richard Halliburton’s Adventures, #2 by G Drake; and Uncharted/Treasure Hunter Security series, #2 by A Hackett.
I like details that pull me in (but also make sense), captivating me as I am taken across the globe and/or under the sea. Clive Cussler is one of my “go to” authors in this genre. I was expecting something along this line when I pick up SHANGRI-LA for the two of us. But SHANGRI-LA was a miss for us, as explained below. YMMV.
SHANGRI-LA ~ Cons.
1) Too much discussion (between characters) and explanations of certain concepts (telling rather than doing) which broke up the action scenes considerably.
2) The world building and various factoids required huge stretches of the imagination that logically didn’t make sense together.
3) For an Action Adventure tale, SHANGRI-LA moved too slowly for us (perhaps caused by the earlier mentioned “telling” rather than “doing”).
4) I/we were alternately bored, skeptical or confused and finished (the final half of the book) only because I/we thought perhaps everything would make sense in the end - which it didn’t. Questions raised in the beginning weren’t addressed by the end. And neither of us really cared anymore.
Pros ~
1) The narration by David Gilmore was fine. It neither improved nor reduced our enjoyment of SHANGRI-LA.
2) The concept was good. I’m always open to a new marine adventurer series. (It simply fizzled and died).
3) Readers who can suspend belief entirely and go along for the ride (as in a fantasy/“Alice in Wonderland” type world), bypass the numerous explanations and/or not particularly care if certain elements are never resolved may enjoy SHANGRI-LA.
4) SHAGRI-LA reads easily. This series may be suitable for YA Action-Adventure readers*.
We read SHANGRI-LA as a standalone title. It felt like there were pieces of information we might have missed from the earlier books, especially relating to the antagonists. Readers may prefer to begin with book #1.
*READER CAUTIONS -
VIOLENCE - PG/PG-13. Not dark.
*PROFANITY - Yes. Strong language is used on a few occasions (but probably less than most students hear on the school bus).
SEXUAL SITUATIONS - None.