=== Many truths but difficult to connect the dots ===
Yes, this book does have many truths that ring true. Even a skeptic has to admit that much. We are told that Jeshua/Jesus manifested himself to Glenda Green off and on for two months in 1992 and responded profusely to her questions about love and life. He would sit next to her on the sofa. He would watch TV (relevant to the topic of the day) with her. She would make notes which form the bulk of the contents of the book. I have read numerous books of, about and “by” Jesus as well as other high luminaries. They express themselves in a wide range of credibility, clarity and comprehension—somehow attempting to appeal to every spiritual palate. It would indeed be truly miraculous if they could gather together for a new “last supper” and strike up a committee to come to some consensus. But alas, no.
Glenda Green’s Jesus speaks like someone with PhD’s in philosophy, religious studies, sociology, psychology and physics. If this “revelation” is targeting the uneducated, unwashed, sick, hungry, flea-bitten and plague-ridden masses—as the Biblical Jesus did—it aims so far above its target that it would be like NASA’s Project Apollo as compared to the Wright brother’s heavier-than-air first flight. Even author Green admits more than once that she has problems connecting the dots. As I was reading this book I asked myself why this book has not succeeded in spiritualizing mankind and reforming society to new levels of unity based on “love without end.” The obvious answer seemed to be that it is too highfalutin. Grandiloquent would be another term. Another answer might be that it is too wrapped up in the package Glenda Green presents and represents. If we are to accept this version of Jesus, we must also accept what Green purports to have experienced and everything about her. True believers would therefore aspire to elevate her to virtual sainthood for having brought a new revelation of divine truth, although she herself attributes this revelation solely to her manifested Jesus.
I found it interesting that in “The Ten Commandments of Love” concerning the seventh commandment about adultery, Jesus says “it is the Father’s will that the institution of marriage be a holy bond… The marriage of a man and a woman honors and recognizes the marriage of all other things.” He is clear that marriage is the traditional union between a man and a woman. Do unsanctified common-law relationships qualify, I wondered. But perhaps even same-sex unions and even polygamy, polyandry and polyamory can qualify within a wider definition because he adds that “whenever two or more come together in love, for any purpose, whatever the relationship, whatever the bond, a union is created within the one spirit.” Or maybe I am amiss in seeking a wider definition of marriage than he intends? If so, the next question would be how to define adultery in an open marriage or polyamorous relationship. Being a dispenser of truth for the twenty-first century can get complicated! (all quotes from page 228)
This is not a book for anyone in a hurry. Although the vocabulary is not difficult the ideas presented are densely complex making it challenging to link one concept to another. Actually it is more case of layering the concepts or constructing them to fit within each other. The paperback binding I had (ninth printing, 2002) was the worst of the worst, the kind that resists being fully opened. It takes muscle to keep this book open enough to read in bed. In this genre I like to underline a lot but the binding made it a chore to do so and it could not be done neatly. One star for the binding, four for the contents.